Sprint and jump performance are determined by localized BIA - an ecological study in track and field adolescent athletes.

Abstract

Background: Raw data obtained through bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) have been applied in different populations to assess body fluids and cell integrity. Assessing raw BIA parameters in specific muscles is an emerging method for evaluating muscle function. We investigated the associations of the BIA-derived variables of resistance (R), reactance (Xc) and phase angle (PhA) measured through whole-body (WB) and muscle-localized (ML) methods with performance in the countermovement jump (CMJ) and 50-meter (m) sprint.

Methods: Thirty-one male track and field athletes (16.5 ± 1.6 years) were assessed. Fat-free mass (FFM) and Fat mass percentage (%FM) were determined by skinfold thickness. BIA at 50 kHz was employed to obtain the WB and ML (right thigh) parameters. The WB and ML-BIA parameters were adjusted by height (R/H, Xc/H) and segment length (R/L, Xc/L). The CMJ assessment was conducted via a contact mat; the software recorded the jump height. The 50-m sprint time was measured via two sets of photocells. Pearson's correlation and linear multiple regression were performed.

Results: ML-PhA was inversely related to the 50-m sprint (β=-0.56) and by itself explained 29% of the sprint time variation. It remained a significant predictor even after adjusting for age, height, FFM and peak height velocity (PHV). ML-R/L was directly related to 50-m sprint (β = 0.48) and inversely related to CMJ performance (β=-0.54), explaining 20% and 27% of the variation in 50-m sprint and CMJ performance, respectively. Similarly, it remained a significant predictor in the adjusted models. Correlations between WB-BIA (PhA, R/H) and performance tests were found to be dependent on covariates.

Conclusions: In this sample, the ML-BIA parameters of R/L and PhA were significantly associated with performance independent of age, height, FFM and PHV. Higher ML-PhA values were associated with better sprint times, whereas higher ML-R/L values were associated with worse sprint times and CMJ performance.