Waitlist mortality for patients with cardiac allograft vasculopathy under the 2018 OPTN donor heart allocation system.

IF 6.4 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Bernard S Kadosh, Suhani S Patel, Sharnendra K Sidhu, Allan B Massie, Stephanie Golob, Randal I Goldberg, Alex Reyentovich, Nader Moazami
{"title":"Waitlist mortality for patients with cardiac allograft vasculopathy under the 2018 OPTN donor heart allocation system.","authors":"Bernard S Kadosh, Suhani S Patel, Sharnendra K Sidhu, Allan B Massie, Stephanie Golob, Randal I Goldberg, Alex Reyentovich, Nader Moazami","doi":"10.1016/j.healun.2024.11.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the 2018 Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network donor heart allocation system, patients listed for re-transplantation due to cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) are assigned to Status 4 unless hemodynamic criteria are met. We aim to examine waitlist outcomes of CAV patients among adult heart transplant candidates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We examined waitlist mortality stratified by CAV and waitlist status among adult heart transplant candidates using Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data from 10/1/2018-11/1/2023. We analyzed waitlist mortality using Kaplan-Meier curves and doubly-robust Cox regressions adjusted for age, gender, sex, race, and dialysis. We compared CAV to non-CAV patients by initial waitlist status, first status of interest, and time-dependent status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 21,586 listed patients, 368 were listed for CAV. CAV patients were most often listed at Status 4 with lower proportions at Status 3/2/1 compared with non-CAV patients. Status 4 and Status 3 CAV candidates demonstrated higher than expected waitlist mortality compared to non-CAV counterparts (Status 4: HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.31-0.84; p < 0.01; Status 3: HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.23-1.64; p = 0.33) with similar mortality to non-CAV patients in Status 3 and 2, respectively (Status 4: HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.48-1.35; p = 0.4; Status 3: HR 1.07, 95% CI 0.40-2.86; p = 0.89). When stratifying by status tier, CAV waitlist patients ever listed at Status 4 and 3 had a higher probability of death compared to their non-CAV counterparts (Status 4: HR 1.99, 95% CI 1.20-3.31, p < 0.01; Status 3: HR 3.06, 95% CI 1.06-8.87, p = 0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>After 2018, CAV patients had a higher risk of waitlist mortality at Status 4 and 3 compared to non-CAV patients. These results suggest that CAV patients are underprioritized in the current allocation system.</p>","PeriodicalId":15900,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healun.2024.11.016","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In the 2018 Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network donor heart allocation system, patients listed for re-transplantation due to cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) are assigned to Status 4 unless hemodynamic criteria are met. We aim to examine waitlist outcomes of CAV patients among adult heart transplant candidates.

Methods: We examined waitlist mortality stratified by CAV and waitlist status among adult heart transplant candidates using Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data from 10/1/2018-11/1/2023. We analyzed waitlist mortality using Kaplan-Meier curves and doubly-robust Cox regressions adjusted for age, gender, sex, race, and dialysis. We compared CAV to non-CAV patients by initial waitlist status, first status of interest, and time-dependent status.

Results: Of 21,586 listed patients, 368 were listed for CAV. CAV patients were most often listed at Status 4 with lower proportions at Status 3/2/1 compared with non-CAV patients. Status 4 and Status 3 CAV candidates demonstrated higher than expected waitlist mortality compared to non-CAV counterparts (Status 4: HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.31-0.84; p < 0.01; Status 3: HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.23-1.64; p = 0.33) with similar mortality to non-CAV patients in Status 3 and 2, respectively (Status 4: HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.48-1.35; p = 0.4; Status 3: HR 1.07, 95% CI 0.40-2.86; p = 0.89). When stratifying by status tier, CAV waitlist patients ever listed at Status 4 and 3 had a higher probability of death compared to their non-CAV counterparts (Status 4: HR 1.99, 95% CI 1.20-3.31, p < 0.01; Status 3: HR 3.06, 95% CI 1.06-8.87, p = 0.04).

Conclusions: After 2018, CAV patients had a higher risk of waitlist mortality at Status 4 and 3 compared to non-CAV patients. These results suggest that CAV patients are underprioritized in the current allocation system.

2018年OPTN捐献心脏分配系统下心脏移植血管病变患者的候补名单死亡率。
目的:在 2018 年器官获取和移植网络供体心脏分配系统中,因心脏同种移植血管病变(CAV)而被列入再移植名单的患者被分配至状态 4,除非符合血液动力学标准。我们旨在研究成人心脏移植候选者中 CAV 患者的候选结果:我们使用移植受者科学登记处 2018 年 10 月 1 日至 2023 年 1 月 11 日的数据,研究了成人心脏移植候选者中按 CAV 和候选状态分层的候选者死亡率。我们使用 Kaplan-Meier 曲线和双稳健 Cox 回归分析了等待名单死亡率,并对年龄、性别、性、种族和透析进行了调整。我们按照初始候选状态、首次关注状态和时间依赖状态对CAV和非CAV患者进行了比较:在 21,586 名列入名单的患者中,有 368 人因 CAV 而列入名单。与非CAV患者相比,CAV患者最常被列入状态4,而被列入状态3/2/1的比例较低。与非CAV患者相比,状态4和状态3的CAV患者的候诊死亡率高于预期(状态4:HR 0.51,95% CI 0.31-0.84;p结论:2018年后,与非CAV患者相比,CAV患者在状态4和状态3时的候补名单死亡率风险更高。这些结果表明,在目前的分配系统中,CAV 患者的优先级不足。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
6.70%
发文量
1667
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation, the official publication of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation, brings readers essential scholarly and timely information in the field of cardio-pulmonary transplantation, mechanical and biological support of the failing heart, advanced lung disease (including pulmonary vascular disease) and cell replacement therapy. Importantly, the journal also serves as a medium of communication of pre-clinical sciences in all these rapidly expanding areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信