Evaluating Cephalic Index Changes in Sagittal Synostosis Surgery: A Retrospective Study of Subtotal Versus Total Vault Remodeling.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Arthur R Kurzbuch, Ben Cooper, Christian Duncan, Jonathan Ellenbogen, Vejay Vakharia, Anusha Hennedige, Chris Parks, Ajay Sinha
{"title":"Evaluating Cephalic Index Changes in Sagittal Synostosis Surgery: A Retrospective Study of Subtotal Versus Total Vault Remodeling.","authors":"Arthur R Kurzbuch, Ben Cooper, Christian Duncan, Jonathan Ellenbogen, Vejay Vakharia, Anusha Hennedige, Chris Parks, Ajay Sinha","doi":"10.1097/SCS.0000000000010922","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Scaphocephaly is the most common form of craniosynostosis, characterized by premature closure of the sagittal suture. Surgical intervention is the standard treatment, aimed at correcting cranial shape and improving the cephalic index (CI), the key metric to quantify postsurgical outcomes. Controversies exist in the literature regarding the optimal timing of surgery and the choice of surgical technique. At our center, children aged 6 to 24 months presenting with sagittal synostosis and frontal bossing without significant occipital bullet undergo subtotal (anterior 2/3) vault remodeling, whereas those with both occipital bullet and frontal bossing are treated with total vault remodeling. This retrospective monocenter study tracks the progression of CI in pediatric patients undergoing these 2 techniques at 3 timepoints. From 2007 to 2015 the authors operated on 32 patients, excluding syndromic cases and reoperations. Twenty-three patients underwent subtotal and 9 total vault remodeling. The mean age at surgery was 12.66 months (range 6-24 months). The CI improved significantly in all patients after surgery. Overall, the CI increased from 66.67% preoperatively to 76.67% postoperatively and to 76.83% at 4 years. In the subtotal vault remodeling group, CI increased from 67.27% to 76.81% postoperatively, reaching 77.27% at 4 years. In the total vault remodeling group, CI rose from 65.11% to 76.29% postoperatively but decreased to 75.07% at 4 years. The authors' data show a sustained improvement in CI postoperatively, with a slight reduction in the total vault remodeling group at long-term follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":15462,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000010922","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Scaphocephaly is the most common form of craniosynostosis, characterized by premature closure of the sagittal suture. Surgical intervention is the standard treatment, aimed at correcting cranial shape and improving the cephalic index (CI), the key metric to quantify postsurgical outcomes. Controversies exist in the literature regarding the optimal timing of surgery and the choice of surgical technique. At our center, children aged 6 to 24 months presenting with sagittal synostosis and frontal bossing without significant occipital bullet undergo subtotal (anterior 2/3) vault remodeling, whereas those with both occipital bullet and frontal bossing are treated with total vault remodeling. This retrospective monocenter study tracks the progression of CI in pediatric patients undergoing these 2 techniques at 3 timepoints. From 2007 to 2015 the authors operated on 32 patients, excluding syndromic cases and reoperations. Twenty-three patients underwent subtotal and 9 total vault remodeling. The mean age at surgery was 12.66 months (range 6-24 months). The CI improved significantly in all patients after surgery. Overall, the CI increased from 66.67% preoperatively to 76.67% postoperatively and to 76.83% at 4 years. In the subtotal vault remodeling group, CI increased from 67.27% to 76.81% postoperatively, reaching 77.27% at 4 years. In the total vault remodeling group, CI rose from 65.11% to 76.29% postoperatively but decreased to 75.07% at 4 years. The authors' data show a sustained improvement in CI postoperatively, with a slight reduction in the total vault remodeling group at long-term follow-up.

评估矢状突手术中的头颅指数变化:椎体次全切除与全穹隆重塑的回顾性研究
头颅骨畸形是最常见的颅骨发育畸形,其特点是矢状缝过早闭合。手术干预是标准的治疗方法,旨在矫正颅形和改善头颅指数(CI),这是量化手术后疗效的关键指标。关于手术的最佳时机和手术技术的选择,文献中存在争议。在我们中心,6 到 24 个月大的矢状突和额状突起而无明显枕骨弹痕的患儿会接受次全(前 2/3)穹隆重塑手术,而同时患有枕骨弹痕和额状突起的患儿则会接受全穹隆重塑手术。这项回顾性单中心研究追踪了接受这两种技术治疗的儿童患者在3个时间点的CI进展情况。从 2007 年到 2015 年,作者共为 32 名患者实施了手术,其中不包括合并症病例和再次手术。23名患者接受了次全穹隆重塑手术,9名患者接受了全穹隆重塑手术。手术时的平均年龄为 12.66 个月(6-24 个月)。所有患者术后的 CI 均有明显改善。总体而言,CI 从术前的 66.67% 增加到术后的 76.67%,4 年后又增加到 76.83%。在次全穹隆重塑组,CI 从术前的 67.27% 增加到术后的 76.81%,4 年后达到 77.27%。在全穹隆重塑组,CI 从术后的 65.11% 上升到 76.29%,但在 4 年后下降到 75.07%。作者的数据显示,CI 在术后得到了持续改善,而在长期随访中,全穹隆重塑组的 CI 略有下降。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
11.10%
发文量
968
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: ​The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery serves as a forum of communication for all those involved in craniofacial surgery, maxillofacial surgery and pediatric plastic surgery. Coverage ranges from practical aspects of craniofacial surgery to the basic science that underlies surgical practice. The journal publishes original articles, scientific reviews, editorials and invited commentary, abstracts and selected articles from international journals, and occasional international bibliographies in craniofacial surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信