Assessment of GHG emissions in dairy production systems based on existing feed resources through the GLEAM model under different climatic zones of Bangladesh and their mitigation options.

IF 1.5 Q3 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Journal of Advanced Veterinary and Animal Research Pub Date : 2024-09-29 eCollection Date: 2024-09-01 DOI:10.5455/javar.2024.k816
Muhammad Khairul Bashar, Nathu Ram Sarker, Nasrin Sultana, Sheikh Mohammad Jahangir Hossain
{"title":"Assessment of GHG emissions in dairy production systems based on existing feed resources through the <i>GLEAM</i> model under different climatic zones of Bangladesh and their mitigation options.","authors":"Muhammad Khairul Bashar, Nathu Ram Sarker, Nasrin Sultana, Sheikh Mohammad Jahangir Hossain","doi":"10.5455/javar.2024.k816","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The current study evaluated the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of dairy cattle through the Global Livestock Environmental Assessment Model <i>(GLEAM)</i> model and illustrated potential mitigation strategies by modifying nutrition interventions.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A semi-structural questionnaire was developed to calculate dairy animal GHG emissions. This study comprised 40 farmers from four districts: river basin (Pabna), drought-prone (Chapainobabganj), floodplain (Nilphamari), and saline-prone (Sathkhira) areas. Ten lactating cows (two cows from each farmer) were also selected to collect information on feeding practices, feed resources, feed intake (roughages and concentrate), water intake, and productive and reproductive parameters for 7 days at each site during two seasons: dry (November-February) and wet (June-October).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The GHG emissions from the river basin area were significantly (<i>p</i> < 0.05) higher due to low-quality roughages (75%), whereas CH<sub>4</sub>/kg of milk production was the lowest (77.0 gm). In contrast, the area that frequently experiences drought showed a different pattern. For instance, the generation of CH<sub>4</sub> from enteric fermentation was 1187.4 tons/year, while the production of CH<sub>4</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>O from manure management was 323.1 tons/year and 4.86 tons/year, respectively. In comparison to other climatic areas, these values were the lowest because the supply of green grass was twice as abundant as in the other climatic areas (40%). The quantity of CH<sub>4</sub>/kg of milk produced in an area susceptible to drought did not vary.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Implementing feeding systems in drought-prone areas is a successful approach to reducing GHG emissions in the dairy industry in Bangladesh. Consequently, implementing feed-balancing techniques can enhance productivity and foster environmentally sustainable animal production.</p>","PeriodicalId":14892,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Veterinary and Animal Research","volume":"11 3","pages":"664-674"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11590580/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Veterinary and Animal Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/javar.2024.k816","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The current study evaluated the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of dairy cattle through the Global Livestock Environmental Assessment Model (GLEAM) model and illustrated potential mitigation strategies by modifying nutrition interventions.

Materials and methods: A semi-structural questionnaire was developed to calculate dairy animal GHG emissions. This study comprised 40 farmers from four districts: river basin (Pabna), drought-prone (Chapainobabganj), floodplain (Nilphamari), and saline-prone (Sathkhira) areas. Ten lactating cows (two cows from each farmer) were also selected to collect information on feeding practices, feed resources, feed intake (roughages and concentrate), water intake, and productive and reproductive parameters for 7 days at each site during two seasons: dry (November-February) and wet (June-October).

Results: The GHG emissions from the river basin area were significantly (p < 0.05) higher due to low-quality roughages (75%), whereas CH4/kg of milk production was the lowest (77.0 gm). In contrast, the area that frequently experiences drought showed a different pattern. For instance, the generation of CH4 from enteric fermentation was 1187.4 tons/year, while the production of CH4 and N2O from manure management was 323.1 tons/year and 4.86 tons/year, respectively. In comparison to other climatic areas, these values were the lowest because the supply of green grass was twice as abundant as in the other climatic areas (40%). The quantity of CH4/kg of milk produced in an area susceptible to drought did not vary.

Conclusion: Implementing feeding systems in drought-prone areas is a successful approach to reducing GHG emissions in the dairy industry in Bangladesh. Consequently, implementing feed-balancing techniques can enhance productivity and foster environmentally sustainable animal production.

通过 GLEAM 模型评估孟加拉国不同气候区基于现有饲料资源的奶牛生产系统的温室气体排放量及其减缓方案。
目的:本研究通过全球家畜环境评估模型(GLEAM)评估了奶牛的温室气体(GHG)排放量,并通过修改营养干预措施说明了潜在的减排策略:为计算奶牛的温室气体排放量,编制了一份半结构式问卷。这项研究包括来自四个地区的 40 位农民:河流流域(巴卜纳)、干旱多发区(查帕诺巴卜甘杰)、洪泛平原(尼尔法马里)和盐碱多发区(萨特希拉)。此外,还选取了 10 头泌乳奶牛(每个农户两头),在干旱(11 月至 2 月)和潮湿(6 月至 10 月)两个季节,在每个地点收集 7 天的饲养方式、饲料资源、饲料摄入量(粗饲料和精饲料)、饮水量、生产和繁殖参数等信息:由于粗饲料质量差(75%),流域地区的温室气体排放量明显较高(p < 0.05),而每公斤牛奶的甲烷排放量最低(77.0 克)。相比之下,经常遭受干旱的地区则呈现出不同的模式。例如,肠道发酵产生的 CH4 为 1187.4 吨/年,而粪便管理产生的 CH4 和 N2O 分别为 323.1 吨/年和 4.86 吨/年。与其他气候区相比,这些数值最低,因为青草的供应量是其他气候区的两倍(40%)。在易受干旱影响的地区,每公斤牛奶所含的 CH4 量没有变化:结论:在易旱地区实施饲喂系统是孟加拉国奶业减少温室气体排放的成功方法。因此,实施饲料平衡技术可提高生产率,促进环境可持续的动物生产。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
7.10%
发文量
41
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Advanced Veterinary and Animal Research (JAVAR) - is an open access, international, peer-reviewed, quarterly, highly-indexed scientific journal publishing original research findings and reviews on all aspects of veterinary and animal sciences. Basic and applied researches on- - Anatomy & histology - Animal health economics - Animal nutrition - Animal reproduction - Animal science - Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) - Biochemistry - Biotechnology - Dairy science - Epidemiology - Food hygiene and technology - Genetics and breeding - Immunology - Microbiology - Parasitology - Pathology - Pharmacology & toxicology - Physiology - Poultry science - Preventive veterinary medicine - Public health - Surgery & obstetrics - Veterinary extension studies - Wildlife & aquatic medicine - Zoo animal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信