Evaluation of cerebral perfusion heterogeneity by the electrical impedance tomography.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 PHYSIOLOGY
Frontiers in Physiology Pub Date : 2024-11-13 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fphys.2024.1476040
Mingxu Zhu, Yu Wang, Junyao Li, Weice Wang, Guobin Gao, Zhenyu Ji, Benyuan Liu, Lei Wang, Weichen Li, Xuetao Shi
{"title":"Evaluation of cerebral perfusion heterogeneity by the electrical impedance tomography.","authors":"Mingxu Zhu, Yu Wang, Junyao Li, Weice Wang, Guobin Gao, Zhenyu Ji, Benyuan Liu, Lei Wang, Weichen Li, Xuetao Shi","doi":"10.3389/fphys.2024.1476040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ability of global inhomogeneity index (GI) and left-right asymmetry index (AI) based on electrical impedance tomography (EIT) to be used in assessing cerebral perfusion heterogeneity. The diagnostic value of these two indices in identifying abnormalities in the degree of cerebral perfusion heterogeneity was also explored.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this study, Transcranial Doppler (TCD) was used as a control, and unilateral carotid artery was compressed to change the degree of heterogeneity of cerebral perfusion in 15 healthy volunteers. The control group consisted of an additional 15 volunteers without any intervention. EIT perfusion images were obtained by calculating the impedance difference between at the beginning and end of cerebral vasodilation. Subsequently, GI and AI were calculated based on the pixel values of intracranial regions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The GI and AI values in the non-carotid artery compression (NCAC) group were significantly lower than those in the unilateral carotid artery compression (UCAC) group (P < 0.001), whereas there was no significant difference between the left carotid artery compression (LCAC) and right carotid artery compression (RCAC) groups. ROC analysis showed that the area under the curve (AUC), specificity and sensitivity of GI in distinguishing between NCAC and UCAC were 0.94, 0.90 and 0.87, respectively. The AUC, specificity and sensitivity of AI in distinguishing between NCAC and UCAC were 0.86, 0.87 and 0.73, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results demonstrated that the GI and AI effectively quantify the distribution of intracranial perfusion, demonstrating excellent validity and interindividual comparability, and the ability to detect abnormal cerebral perfusion heterogeneity.</p>","PeriodicalId":12477,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Physiology","volume":"15 ","pages":"1476040"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11599225/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2024.1476040","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ability of global inhomogeneity index (GI) and left-right asymmetry index (AI) based on electrical impedance tomography (EIT) to be used in assessing cerebral perfusion heterogeneity. The diagnostic value of these two indices in identifying abnormalities in the degree of cerebral perfusion heterogeneity was also explored.

Methods: In this study, Transcranial Doppler (TCD) was used as a control, and unilateral carotid artery was compressed to change the degree of heterogeneity of cerebral perfusion in 15 healthy volunteers. The control group consisted of an additional 15 volunteers without any intervention. EIT perfusion images were obtained by calculating the impedance difference between at the beginning and end of cerebral vasodilation. Subsequently, GI and AI were calculated based on the pixel values of intracranial regions.

Results: The GI and AI values in the non-carotid artery compression (NCAC) group were significantly lower than those in the unilateral carotid artery compression (UCAC) group (P < 0.001), whereas there was no significant difference between the left carotid artery compression (LCAC) and right carotid artery compression (RCAC) groups. ROC analysis showed that the area under the curve (AUC), specificity and sensitivity of GI in distinguishing between NCAC and UCAC were 0.94, 0.90 and 0.87, respectively. The AUC, specificity and sensitivity of AI in distinguishing between NCAC and UCAC were 0.86, 0.87 and 0.73, respectively.

Conclusion: The results demonstrated that the GI and AI effectively quantify the distribution of intracranial perfusion, demonstrating excellent validity and interindividual comparability, and the ability to detect abnormal cerebral perfusion heterogeneity.

用电阻抗断层扫描评估脑灌注异质性
目的:本研究旨在评估基于电阻抗断层扫描(EIT)的总体不均匀指数(GI)和左右不对称指数(AI)用于评估脑灌注异质性的能力。研究还探讨了这两个指数在识别脑灌注异质性程度异常方面的诊断价值:在这项研究中,经颅多普勒(TCD)被用作对照,单侧颈动脉被压缩,以改变 15 名健康志愿者的脑灌注异质性程度。对照组由另外 15 名未进行任何干预的志愿者组成。通过计算脑血管扩张开始和结束时的阻抗差,获得 EIT 灌注图像。随后,根据颅内区域的像素值计算 GI 和 AI:结果:非颈动脉压迫(NCAC)组的 GI 值和 AI 值明显低于单侧颈动脉压迫(UCAC)组(P < 0.001),而左侧颈动脉压迫(LCAC)组和右侧颈动脉压迫(RCAC)组之间无明显差异。ROC 分析显示,GI 在区分 NCAC 和 UCAC 方面的曲线下面积(AUC)、特异性和灵敏度分别为 0.94、0.90 和 0.87。AI区分NCAC和UCAC的AUC、特异性和灵敏度分别为0.86、0.87和0.73:结果表明,GI 和 AI 能有效量化颅内灌注的分布,具有良好的有效性和个体间可比性,并能检测异常脑灌注异质性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
5.00%
发文量
2608
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Physiology is a leading journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research on the physiology of living systems, from the subcellular and molecular domains to the intact organism, and its interaction with the environment. Field Chief Editor George E. Billman at the Ohio State University Columbus is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信