Ovarian-Adnexal Imaging-Reporting and Data System (O-RADS) ultrasound version 2019: a prospective validation and comparison to updated version (v2022) in pathologically confirmed adnexal masses.
IF 4.7 2区 医学Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Yassir Edrees Almalki, Mohammad Abd Alkhalik Basha, Mohamad Gamal Nada, Maha Ibrahim Metwally, Yasmin Ibrahim Libda, Noha Yahia Ebaid, Mohamed M A Zaitoun, Nader E M Mahmoud, Amgad M Elsheikh, Mohamed Hesham Saleh Saleh Radwan, Mohamed I Amin, Elshaimaa Mohamed Mohamed, Engy Fathy Tantawy, Sameh Saber, Walid Mosallam, Housseini Mohamed Abdalla, Mohamed Abd El-Aziz Mohamed Farag, Tamer Mahmoud Dawoud, Hamada M Khater, Diaa Bakry Eldib, Jehan Ibrahim Altohamy, Rasha Taha Abouelkheir, Waseem M El Gendy, Sharifa Khalid Alduraibi, Majed Saeed Alshahrani, Safaa A Ibrahim, Ahmed M Radwan, Ahmed Ali Obaya, Ahmed M Abdelkhalik Basha, Ahmed Mohamed El-Maghraby
{"title":"Ovarian-Adnexal Imaging-Reporting and Data System (O-RADS) ultrasound version 2019: a prospective validation and comparison to updated version (v2022) in pathologically confirmed adnexal masses.","authors":"Yassir Edrees Almalki, Mohammad Abd Alkhalik Basha, Mohamad Gamal Nada, Maha Ibrahim Metwally, Yasmin Ibrahim Libda, Noha Yahia Ebaid, Mohamed M A Zaitoun, Nader E M Mahmoud, Amgad M Elsheikh, Mohamed Hesham Saleh Saleh Radwan, Mohamed I Amin, Elshaimaa Mohamed Mohamed, Engy Fathy Tantawy, Sameh Saber, Walid Mosallam, Housseini Mohamed Abdalla, Mohamed Abd El-Aziz Mohamed Farag, Tamer Mahmoud Dawoud, Hamada M Khater, Diaa Bakry Eldib, Jehan Ibrahim Altohamy, Rasha Taha Abouelkheir, Waseem M El Gendy, Sharifa Khalid Alduraibi, Majed Saeed Alshahrani, Safaa A Ibrahim, Ahmed M Radwan, Ahmed Ali Obaya, Ahmed M Abdelkhalik Basha, Ahmed Mohamed El-Maghraby","doi":"10.1007/s00330-024-11235-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and reliability of the Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS) ultrasound v2019 in classifying adnexal masses (AMs) and compare the old and updated systems (v2022).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This prospective study enrolled 977 consecutive women with suspected AMs from three institutions between January 2022 and December 2023. Ultrasound examinations were performed by three experienced radiologists who categorized AMs according to O-RADS ultrasound v2019. The same radiologists retrospectively reviewed the stored ultrasound images and provided the O-RADS ultrasound v2022 classification. Histopathology was used as the reference standard to calculate the diagnostic accuracy of the O-RADS versions in predicting malignant AMs. Inter-observer agreement (IOA) of the O-RADS scoring results was evaluated using the Fleiss kappa (κ) test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final analysis included 803 women with 855 AMs (219 (25.6%) malignant and 636 (74.4%) benign). Both O-RADS versions demonstrated good diagnostic accuracy, with area under the curve (AUC) values ranging from 0.906 to 0.923 (v2019) and 0.919 to 0.936 (v2022). The updated v2022 showed a slightly higher accuracy (82.5-86.7% vs. 80.7-85.3%), sensitivity (93.6-95.0% vs. 92.2-94.1%), and specificity (78.1-84.1% vs. 76.1-82.9%) compared to v2019. The IOA for the overall O-RADS classification was perfect for both versions (κ = 0.96-0.97).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The O-RADS ultrasound classification system demonstrated good diagnostic accuracy and reliability in predicting malignant AMs, with the updated v2022 showing modest improvements.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Question Accurate classification of adnexal masses is essential for management. Can updated O-RADS ultrasound v2022 improve diagnostic accuracy and reliability compared to v2019 in predicting malignancies? Findings O-RADS ultrasound v2022 demonstrated slightly higher diagnostic accuracy for identifying malignant adnexal masses compared to v2019, reflecting modest improvements in risk stratification and clinical decision-making. Clinical relevance The updated O-RADS ultrasound v2022 provides improved risk stratification for adnexal masses, enhancing diagnostic confidence, supporting more precise clinical decision-making, and improving patient outcomes through timely intervention or tailored management strategies in ovarian cancer care.</p>","PeriodicalId":12076,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"3080-3095"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-024-11235-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and reliability of the Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS) ultrasound v2019 in classifying adnexal masses (AMs) and compare the old and updated systems (v2022).
Patients and methods: This prospective study enrolled 977 consecutive women with suspected AMs from three institutions between January 2022 and December 2023. Ultrasound examinations were performed by three experienced radiologists who categorized AMs according to O-RADS ultrasound v2019. The same radiologists retrospectively reviewed the stored ultrasound images and provided the O-RADS ultrasound v2022 classification. Histopathology was used as the reference standard to calculate the diagnostic accuracy of the O-RADS versions in predicting malignant AMs. Inter-observer agreement (IOA) of the O-RADS scoring results was evaluated using the Fleiss kappa (κ) test.
Results: The final analysis included 803 women with 855 AMs (219 (25.6%) malignant and 636 (74.4%) benign). Both O-RADS versions demonstrated good diagnostic accuracy, with area under the curve (AUC) values ranging from 0.906 to 0.923 (v2019) and 0.919 to 0.936 (v2022). The updated v2022 showed a slightly higher accuracy (82.5-86.7% vs. 80.7-85.3%), sensitivity (93.6-95.0% vs. 92.2-94.1%), and specificity (78.1-84.1% vs. 76.1-82.9%) compared to v2019. The IOA for the overall O-RADS classification was perfect for both versions (κ = 0.96-0.97).
Conclusions: The O-RADS ultrasound classification system demonstrated good diagnostic accuracy and reliability in predicting malignant AMs, with the updated v2022 showing modest improvements.
Key points: Question Accurate classification of adnexal masses is essential for management. Can updated O-RADS ultrasound v2022 improve diagnostic accuracy and reliability compared to v2019 in predicting malignancies? Findings O-RADS ultrasound v2022 demonstrated slightly higher diagnostic accuracy for identifying malignant adnexal masses compared to v2019, reflecting modest improvements in risk stratification and clinical decision-making. Clinical relevance The updated O-RADS ultrasound v2022 provides improved risk stratification for adnexal masses, enhancing diagnostic confidence, supporting more precise clinical decision-making, and improving patient outcomes through timely intervention or tailored management strategies in ovarian cancer care.
期刊介绍:
European Radiology (ER) continuously updates scientific knowledge in radiology by publication of strong original articles and state-of-the-art reviews written by leading radiologists. A well balanced combination of review articles, original papers, short communications from European radiological congresses and information on society matters makes ER an indispensable source for current information in this field.
This is the Journal of the European Society of Radiology, and the official journal of a number of societies.
From 2004-2008 supplements to European Radiology were published under its companion, European Radiology Supplements, ISSN 1613-3749.