Ovarian-Adnexal Imaging-Reporting and Data System (O-RADS) ultrasound version 2019: a prospective validation and comparison to updated version (v2022) in pathologically confirmed adnexal masses.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
European Radiology Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-28 DOI:10.1007/s00330-024-11235-z
Yassir Edrees Almalki, Mohammad Abd Alkhalik Basha, Mohamad Gamal Nada, Maha Ibrahim Metwally, Yasmin Ibrahim Libda, Noha Yahia Ebaid, Mohamed M A Zaitoun, Nader E M Mahmoud, Amgad M Elsheikh, Mohamed Hesham Saleh Saleh Radwan, Mohamed I Amin, Elshaimaa Mohamed Mohamed, Engy Fathy Tantawy, Sameh Saber, Walid Mosallam, Housseini Mohamed Abdalla, Mohamed Abd El-Aziz Mohamed Farag, Tamer Mahmoud Dawoud, Hamada M Khater, Diaa Bakry Eldib, Jehan Ibrahim Altohamy, Rasha Taha Abouelkheir, Waseem M El Gendy, Sharifa Khalid Alduraibi, Majed Saeed Alshahrani, Safaa A Ibrahim, Ahmed M Radwan, Ahmed Ali Obaya, Ahmed M Abdelkhalik Basha, Ahmed Mohamed El-Maghraby
{"title":"Ovarian-Adnexal Imaging-Reporting and Data System (O-RADS) ultrasound version 2019: a prospective validation and comparison to updated version (v2022) in pathologically confirmed adnexal masses.","authors":"Yassir Edrees Almalki, Mohammad Abd Alkhalik Basha, Mohamad Gamal Nada, Maha Ibrahim Metwally, Yasmin Ibrahim Libda, Noha Yahia Ebaid, Mohamed M A Zaitoun, Nader E M Mahmoud, Amgad M Elsheikh, Mohamed Hesham Saleh Saleh Radwan, Mohamed I Amin, Elshaimaa Mohamed Mohamed, Engy Fathy Tantawy, Sameh Saber, Walid Mosallam, Housseini Mohamed Abdalla, Mohamed Abd El-Aziz Mohamed Farag, Tamer Mahmoud Dawoud, Hamada M Khater, Diaa Bakry Eldib, Jehan Ibrahim Altohamy, Rasha Taha Abouelkheir, Waseem M El Gendy, Sharifa Khalid Alduraibi, Majed Saeed Alshahrani, Safaa A Ibrahim, Ahmed M Radwan, Ahmed Ali Obaya, Ahmed M Abdelkhalik Basha, Ahmed Mohamed El-Maghraby","doi":"10.1007/s00330-024-11235-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and reliability of the Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS) ultrasound v2019 in classifying adnexal masses (AMs) and compare the old and updated systems (v2022).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This prospective study enrolled 977 consecutive women with suspected AMs from three institutions between January 2022 and December 2023. Ultrasound examinations were performed by three experienced radiologists who categorized AMs according to O-RADS ultrasound v2019. The same radiologists retrospectively reviewed the stored ultrasound images and provided the O-RADS ultrasound v2022 classification. Histopathology was used as the reference standard to calculate the diagnostic accuracy of the O-RADS versions in predicting malignant AMs. Inter-observer agreement (IOA) of the O-RADS scoring results was evaluated using the Fleiss kappa (κ) test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final analysis included 803 women with 855 AMs (219 (25.6%) malignant and 636 (74.4%) benign). Both O-RADS versions demonstrated good diagnostic accuracy, with area under the curve (AUC) values ranging from 0.906 to 0.923 (v2019) and 0.919 to 0.936 (v2022). The updated v2022 showed a slightly higher accuracy (82.5-86.7% vs. 80.7-85.3%), sensitivity (93.6-95.0% vs. 92.2-94.1%), and specificity (78.1-84.1% vs. 76.1-82.9%) compared to v2019. The IOA for the overall O-RADS classification was perfect for both versions (κ = 0.96-0.97).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The O-RADS ultrasound classification system demonstrated good diagnostic accuracy and reliability in predicting malignant AMs, with the updated v2022 showing modest improvements.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Question Accurate classification of adnexal masses is essential for management. Can updated O-RADS ultrasound v2022 improve diagnostic accuracy and reliability compared to v2019 in predicting malignancies? Findings O-RADS ultrasound v2022 demonstrated slightly higher diagnostic accuracy for identifying malignant adnexal masses compared to v2019, reflecting modest improvements in risk stratification and clinical decision-making. Clinical relevance The updated O-RADS ultrasound v2022 provides improved risk stratification for adnexal masses, enhancing diagnostic confidence, supporting more precise clinical decision-making, and improving patient outcomes through timely intervention or tailored management strategies in ovarian cancer care.</p>","PeriodicalId":12076,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"3080-3095"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-024-11235-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and reliability of the Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS) ultrasound v2019 in classifying adnexal masses (AMs) and compare the old and updated systems (v2022).

Patients and methods: This prospective study enrolled 977 consecutive women with suspected AMs from three institutions between January 2022 and December 2023. Ultrasound examinations were performed by three experienced radiologists who categorized AMs according to O-RADS ultrasound v2019. The same radiologists retrospectively reviewed the stored ultrasound images and provided the O-RADS ultrasound v2022 classification. Histopathology was used as the reference standard to calculate the diagnostic accuracy of the O-RADS versions in predicting malignant AMs. Inter-observer agreement (IOA) of the O-RADS scoring results was evaluated using the Fleiss kappa (κ) test.

Results: The final analysis included 803 women with 855 AMs (219 (25.6%) malignant and 636 (74.4%) benign). Both O-RADS versions demonstrated good diagnostic accuracy, with area under the curve (AUC) values ranging from 0.906 to 0.923 (v2019) and 0.919 to 0.936 (v2022). The updated v2022 showed a slightly higher accuracy (82.5-86.7% vs. 80.7-85.3%), sensitivity (93.6-95.0% vs. 92.2-94.1%), and specificity (78.1-84.1% vs. 76.1-82.9%) compared to v2019. The IOA for the overall O-RADS classification was perfect for both versions (κ = 0.96-0.97).

Conclusions: The O-RADS ultrasound classification system demonstrated good diagnostic accuracy and reliability in predicting malignant AMs, with the updated v2022 showing modest improvements.

Key points: Question Accurate classification of adnexal masses is essential for management. Can updated O-RADS ultrasound v2022 improve diagnostic accuracy and reliability compared to v2019 in predicting malignancies? Findings O-RADS ultrasound v2022 demonstrated slightly higher diagnostic accuracy for identifying malignant adnexal masses compared to v2019, reflecting modest improvements in risk stratification and clinical decision-making. Clinical relevance The updated O-RADS ultrasound v2022 provides improved risk stratification for adnexal masses, enhancing diagnostic confidence, supporting more precise clinical decision-making, and improving patient outcomes through timely intervention or tailored management strategies in ovarian cancer care.

卵巢-附件成像-报告和数据系统(O-RADS)2019版超声:病理确诊附件肿块的前瞻性验证及与更新版(v2022)的比较。
目的评估卵巢-附件报告和数据系统(O-RADS)超声波 v2019 对附件肿块(AMs)分类的诊断准确性和可靠性,并比较旧系统和更新系统(v2022):这项前瞻性研究在2022年1月至2023年12月期间连续招募了977名来自三家机构的疑似附件肿块妇女。超声波检查由三位经验丰富的放射科医生进行,他们根据 O-RADS 超声波 v2019 对 AM 进行分类。同几位放射科医生对存储的超声图像进行了回顾性审查,并提供了 O-RADS v2022 超声分类。组织病理学作为参考标准来计算 O-RADS 版本在预测恶性 AM 方面的诊断准确性。使用弗莱斯卡帕(κ)检验评估了O-RADS评分结果的观察者间一致性(IOA):最终分析包括 803 名妇女的 855 个 AM(219 个(25.6%)恶性,636 个(74.4%)良性)。两个版本的O-RADS均显示出良好的诊断准确性,曲线下面积(AUC)值分别为0.906至0.923(v2019)和0.919至0.936(v2022)。更新后的 v2022 与 v2019 相比,准确性(82.5-86.7% 对 80.7-85.3%)、灵敏度(93.6-95.0% 对 92.2-94.1%)和特异性(78.1-84.1% 对 76.1-82.9%)略高。两个版本的O-RADS整体分类的IOA都很完美(κ = 0.96-0.97):结论:O-RADS超声分类系统在预测恶性附件炎方面表现出良好的诊断准确性和可靠性,更新后的v2022版本略有改进:问题:附件肿块的准确分类对治疗至关重要。与 v2019 相比,更新版 O-RADS 超声诊断系统 v2022 在预测恶性肿瘤方面能否提高诊断准确性和可靠性?研究结果 与 v2019 相比,O-RADS 超声诊断版本 2022 在鉴别恶性附件肿块方面的诊断准确性略有提高,这反映出在风险分层和临床决策方面略有改进。临床相关性 更新后的 O-RADS 超声检查 v2022 版改进了附件肿块的风险分层,增强了诊断信心,支持更精确的临床决策,并通过及时干预或量身定制的卵巢癌治疗策略改善患者预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Radiology
European Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
8.50%
发文量
874
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: European Radiology (ER) continuously updates scientific knowledge in radiology by publication of strong original articles and state-of-the-art reviews written by leading radiologists. A well balanced combination of review articles, original papers, short communications from European radiological congresses and information on society matters makes ER an indispensable source for current information in this field. This is the Journal of the European Society of Radiology, and the official journal of a number of societies. From 2004-2008 supplements to European Radiology were published under its companion, European Radiology Supplements, ISSN 1613-3749.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信