Alisa Höchsmann, Jasmin Schairer, Oliver Schott, Ralf Höneise, Christian Neusüß
{"title":"Flow Rate Determination of the Nanoflow Sheath Liquid CE-MS-Coupling Applying the nanoCEasy Interface.","authors":"Alisa Höchsmann, Jasmin Schairer, Oliver Schott, Ralf Höneise, Christian Neusüß","doi":"10.1002/elps.202400191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In recent years, nanoflow sheath liquid (nanoSL) interfaces have been used more commonly for capillary electrophoresis-mass spectrometry (CE-MS) coupling due to their high sensitivity combined with flexibility in CE separation conditions. So far, the exact amount of sheath liquid (SL) and, thus, the dilution effect remain unknown due to the self-supplying type of the nanoSL interfaces. To quantify the SL flow rates, we present here an approach for the determination of the flow rate based on isotopically labeled standards using the nanoCEasy interface. SL and pumped CE flow are spiked with atrazine and d5-atrazine, respectively, enabling the determination of the total flow rate for different electrospray (ES) conditions. Generally, flow rates increase with higher ES voltages. Only at high ES voltages, larger emitter sizes lead to higher flow rates; for low voltages, flow rates are independent of emitter size. Additionally, smaller emitter sizes can generally be operated at lower ES voltages. Visualizing the ES, higher flow rates lead to a larger spray angle. Higher flow rates may decrease the signal intensity by diluting the CE-separated analytes. Indeed, this effect is observed for the flow-injected atrazine analytes and in the CE-MS analysis of an amino acid standard mix under aqueous acidic separation conditions. Therefore, lower flow rates are preferred for low electroosmotic flow (EOF) applications. However, in high EOF applications, higher voltages are required to prevent the accumulation of aqueous background electrolyte (BGE) at the emitter tip, which otherwise leads to peak broadening and inefficient ionization. Overall, the presented data enable the selection of stable and sensitive settings for nanoSL interfaces.</p>","PeriodicalId":11596,"journal":{"name":"ELECTROPHORESIS","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ELECTROPHORESIS","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.202400191","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In recent years, nanoflow sheath liquid (nanoSL) interfaces have been used more commonly for capillary electrophoresis-mass spectrometry (CE-MS) coupling due to their high sensitivity combined with flexibility in CE separation conditions. So far, the exact amount of sheath liquid (SL) and, thus, the dilution effect remain unknown due to the self-supplying type of the nanoSL interfaces. To quantify the SL flow rates, we present here an approach for the determination of the flow rate based on isotopically labeled standards using the nanoCEasy interface. SL and pumped CE flow are spiked with atrazine and d5-atrazine, respectively, enabling the determination of the total flow rate for different electrospray (ES) conditions. Generally, flow rates increase with higher ES voltages. Only at high ES voltages, larger emitter sizes lead to higher flow rates; for low voltages, flow rates are independent of emitter size. Additionally, smaller emitter sizes can generally be operated at lower ES voltages. Visualizing the ES, higher flow rates lead to a larger spray angle. Higher flow rates may decrease the signal intensity by diluting the CE-separated analytes. Indeed, this effect is observed for the flow-injected atrazine analytes and in the CE-MS analysis of an amino acid standard mix under aqueous acidic separation conditions. Therefore, lower flow rates are preferred for low electroosmotic flow (EOF) applications. However, in high EOF applications, higher voltages are required to prevent the accumulation of aqueous background electrolyte (BGE) at the emitter tip, which otherwise leads to peak broadening and inefficient ionization. Overall, the presented data enable the selection of stable and sensitive settings for nanoSL interfaces.
近年来,纳米流鞘液(nanoSL)界面因其高灵敏度和毛细管电泳-质谱联用(CE-MS)分离条件的灵活性而被更广泛地用于毛细管电泳-质谱联用。迄今为止,由于纳米鞘液(SL)界面是自给式的,因此鞘液(SL)的确切量以及稀释效果仍是未知数。为了量化鞘液流速,我们在此介绍一种使用 nanoCEasy 界面、基于同位素标记标准的流速测定方法。在 SL 和泵送的 CE 流量中分别添加了阿特拉津和 d5-atrazine,从而可以确定不同电喷雾(ES)条件下的总流量。一般来说,流速随着 ES 电压的升高而增加。只有在高 ES 电压条件下,发射器尺寸越大,流速越高;在低电压条件下,流速与发射器尺寸无关。此外,较小尺寸的发射器通常可以在较低的 ES 电压下工作。观察 ES,流速越高,喷射角度越大。较高的流速可能会稀释 CE 分离出来的分析物,从而降低信号强度。事实上,在水酸性分离条件下,流动注入的阿特拉津分析物和氨基酸标准混合物的 CE-MS 分析中都观察到了这种效应。因此,在低电渗流(EOF)应用中,较低的流速是首选。然而,在高 EOF 应用中,需要更高的电压来防止水背景电解质(BGE)在发射器尖端积累,否则会导致峰值变宽和电离效率低下。总之,所提供的数据有助于为纳米超声界面选择稳定、灵敏的设置。
期刊介绍:
ELECTROPHORESIS is an international journal that publishes original manuscripts on all aspects of electrophoresis, and liquid phase separations (e.g., HPLC, micro- and nano-LC, UHPLC, micro- and nano-fluidics, liquid-phase micro-extractions, etc.).
Topics include new or improved analytical and preparative methods, sample preparation, development of theory, and innovative applications of electrophoretic and liquid phase separations methods in the study of nucleic acids, proteins, carbohydrates natural products, pharmaceuticals, food analysis, environmental species and other compounds of importance to the life sciences.
Papers in the areas of microfluidics and proteomics, which are not limited to electrophoresis-based methods, will also be accepted for publication. Contributions focused on hyphenated and omics techniques are also of interest. Proteomics is within the scope, if related to its fundamentals and new technical approaches. Proteomics applications are only considered in particular cases.
Papers describing the application of standard electrophoretic methods will not be considered.
Papers on nanoanalysis intended for publication in ELECTROPHORESIS should focus on one or more of the following topics:
• Nanoscale electrokinetics and phenomena related to electric double layer and/or confinement in nano-sized geometry
• Single cell and subcellular analysis
• Nanosensors and ultrasensitive detection aspects (e.g., involving quantum dots, "nanoelectrodes" or nanospray MS)
• Nanoscale/nanopore DNA sequencing (next generation sequencing)
• Micro- and nanoscale sample preparation
• Nanoparticles and cells analyses by dielectrophoresis
• Separation-based analysis using nanoparticles, nanotubes and nanowires.