The impact of dentofacial characteristics and malocclusions on dissatisfaction with dentofacial appearance.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Sinem İnce-Bingöl, Burçak Kaya
{"title":"The impact of dentofacial characteristics and malocclusions on dissatisfaction with dentofacial appearance.","authors":"Sinem İnce-Bingöl, Burçak Kaya","doi":"10.1007/s00784-024-06060-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess how, and to what extent, dentofacial features and malocclusions affect the perceived dissatisfaction with the appearance of dentofacial region in different age groups.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Dissatisfaction with dental appearance (DDA) and facial appearance (DFA) of 430 patients were assessed using self-reported 5-point Likert scores (1: very satisfied - 5:very dissatisfied). Number of decayed, filled, and missing teeth, oral hygiene status, crowding in the upper/lower arches, molar relationship, overjet, overbite, posterior-crossbite, upper/lower midline deviations, face type, profile, nasal tip and chin deviations were assessed by an experienced orthodontist. Ordinal logistic regression analysis was performed to determine how the examined variables affected DDA and DFA scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median age of the 430 patients (271 female, 159 male) was 23.0 years. 60.9% of the patients had Angle Class I, 32.3% had Angle Class II, and 6.7% had Angle Class III molar relationship. According to the IOTN (DC), 37.4% of the patients had grade 4 and grade 5. Gender had no impact on DDA and DFA. Being young (teenagers OR = 4.78, CI:2.43-9.40, young adults (OR = 3.15, CI: 1.70-5.83), having poor oral hygiene (OR = 2.32, CI: 1.37-3.92), missing teeth (OR = 1.19, CI:1.10-1.29), convex profile (OR = 1.94, CI:1.03-3.67), diastema (OR = 3.18, CI:1.33-7.61), crowding in the upper arch (moderate: OR = 2.10, CI:1.30-3.68, severe: OR = 5.94, CI:3.15-11.19) affected the DDA scores negatively. Class III malocclusion (OR = 5.60, CI:1.85-16.91), decreased overbite (OR = 2.44, CI:1.21-4.89), and increase in DDA scores (OR = 1.88, CI: 1.50-2.35) all increased the DFA scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Certain dentofacial characteristics and age of the patients significantly affect self-reported dissatisfaction with dental and facial appearance levels, with varying degrees of severity.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Awareness of the impacts of malocclusions and dentofacial features that result in patient dissatisfaction among those who apply for dental treatment at the clinic enables a deeper understanding of the patient's priorities, expectations from orthodontic treatment, and satisfaction with the outcome.</p>","PeriodicalId":10461,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Oral Investigations","volume":"28 12","pages":"661"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Oral Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-024-06060-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To assess how, and to what extent, dentofacial features and malocclusions affect the perceived dissatisfaction with the appearance of dentofacial region in different age groups.

Materials and methods: Dissatisfaction with dental appearance (DDA) and facial appearance (DFA) of 430 patients were assessed using self-reported 5-point Likert scores (1: very satisfied - 5:very dissatisfied). Number of decayed, filled, and missing teeth, oral hygiene status, crowding in the upper/lower arches, molar relationship, overjet, overbite, posterior-crossbite, upper/lower midline deviations, face type, profile, nasal tip and chin deviations were assessed by an experienced orthodontist. Ordinal logistic regression analysis was performed to determine how the examined variables affected DDA and DFA scores.

Results: The median age of the 430 patients (271 female, 159 male) was 23.0 years. 60.9% of the patients had Angle Class I, 32.3% had Angle Class II, and 6.7% had Angle Class III molar relationship. According to the IOTN (DC), 37.4% of the patients had grade 4 and grade 5. Gender had no impact on DDA and DFA. Being young (teenagers OR = 4.78, CI:2.43-9.40, young adults (OR = 3.15, CI: 1.70-5.83), having poor oral hygiene (OR = 2.32, CI: 1.37-3.92), missing teeth (OR = 1.19, CI:1.10-1.29), convex profile (OR = 1.94, CI:1.03-3.67), diastema (OR = 3.18, CI:1.33-7.61), crowding in the upper arch (moderate: OR = 2.10, CI:1.30-3.68, severe: OR = 5.94, CI:3.15-11.19) affected the DDA scores negatively. Class III malocclusion (OR = 5.60, CI:1.85-16.91), decreased overbite (OR = 2.44, CI:1.21-4.89), and increase in DDA scores (OR = 1.88, CI: 1.50-2.35) all increased the DFA scores.

Conclusion: Certain dentofacial characteristics and age of the patients significantly affect self-reported dissatisfaction with dental and facial appearance levels, with varying degrees of severity.

Clinical relevance: Awareness of the impacts of malocclusions and dentofacial features that result in patient dissatisfaction among those who apply for dental treatment at the clinic enables a deeper understanding of the patient's priorities, expectations from orthodontic treatment, and satisfaction with the outcome.

颌面特征和畸形对颌面外观不满意度的影响。
目的评估颌面部特征和畸形如何以及在多大程度上影响不同年龄组对颌面部外观的不满意度:对 430 名患者的牙齿外观(DDA)和面部外观(DFA)不满意度进行评估,采用自我报告的 5 点 Likert 评分(1:非常满意 - 5:非常不满意)。蛀牙、补牙和缺牙的数量、口腔卫生状况、上下牙弓拥挤、臼齿关系、过咬合、过咬合、后交叉咬合、上下中线偏差、脸型、轮廓、鼻尖和下巴偏差均由经验丰富的正畸医生进行评估。为了确定所检查的变量对 DDA 和 DFA 评分的影响,我们进行了顺序逻辑回归分析:430 名患者(271 名女性,159 名男性)的中位年龄为 23.0 岁。60.9%的患者为Ⅰ度角,32.3%为Ⅱ度角,6.7%为Ⅲ度角臼齿关系。根据 IOTN(DC),37.4% 的患者为 4 级和 5 级。性别对 DDA 和 DFA 没有影响。年轻(青少年 OR = 4.78,CI:2.43-9.40;青壮年 OR = 3.15,CI:1.70-5.83)、口腔卫生差(OR = 2.32,CI:1.37-3.92)、缺牙(OR = 1.19,CI:1.10-1.29)、凸面(OR = 1.94,CI:1.03-3.67)、舒展(OR=3.18,CI:1.33-7.61)、上牙弓拥挤(中度:OR=2.10,CI:1.30-3.68,重度:OR=5.94,CI:3.15-11.19)对 DDA 评分有负面影响。Ⅲ类错颌畸形(OR = 5.60,CI:1.85-16.91)、咬合过度减少(OR = 2.44,CI:1.21-4.89)和 DDA 分数增加(OR = 1.88,CI:1.50-2.35)都会提高 DFA 分数:结论:患者的某些颌面特征和年龄会显著影响其自我报告的对牙齿和面部外观的不满意度,严重程度各不相同:临床相关性:了解导致患者不满意的畸形和颌面部特征对诊所牙科治疗申请者的影响,可以更深入地了解患者的优先事项、对正畸治疗的期望以及对治疗结果的满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Oral Investigations
Clinical Oral Investigations 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
484
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The journal Clinical Oral Investigations is a multidisciplinary, international forum for publication of research from all fields of oral medicine. The journal publishes original scientific articles and invited reviews which provide up-to-date results of basic and clinical studies in oral and maxillofacial science and medicine. The aim is to clarify the relevance of new results to modern practice, for an international readership. Coverage includes maxillofacial and oral surgery, prosthetics and restorative dentistry, operative dentistry, endodontics, periodontology, orthodontics, dental materials science, clinical trials, epidemiology, pedodontics, oral implant, preventive dentistiry, oral pathology, oral basic sciences and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信