Sex Differences and Correlates of the Utility of the Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test for Prescribing Exercise at Entry to Cardiac Rehabilitation.

IF 5.8 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Susan Marzolini, Paul Oh, James E Peterman, Phillip Wallace, Azadeh Yadollahi, Fernando Rivera, Carolina Carvalho, Leonard A Kaminsky
{"title":"Sex Differences and Correlates of the Utility of the Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test for Prescribing Exercise at Entry to Cardiac Rehabilitation.","authors":"Susan Marzolini, Paul Oh, James E Peterman, Phillip Wallace, Azadeh Yadollahi, Fernando Rivera, Carolina Carvalho, Leonard A Kaminsky","doi":"10.1016/j.cjca.2024.11.022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite the importance of objective measures for prescribing aerobic exercise for mitigating cardiovascular risk in people with coronary artery disease (CAD), no study has examined sex differences in the utility of the cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) for developing the exercise prescription.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>CPET results from 1,352 females and 5,875 males with CAD were analyzed to determine if there was a sex difference in achieving maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) or an identifiable first ventilatory threshold (VT1). Secondary outcomes were to determine correlates of not achieving VO2max or VT1 in all patients and males and females separately.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A greater proportion of males than females achieved VO2max or VT1 (89.7% vs 71.3%; p<0.001), specifically achieving VO2max (40.2% vs 26.7%; p<.001) and VT1 (88.0% vs 69.2%; p<.001). The most influential correlates of not achieving VO2max or VT1 were female sex (OR=3.1:95% CI, 2.6-3.7), age >60 yrs, tested on treadmill vs cycle, depressive symptoms, and a secondary heart failure diagnosis. At entry to cardiac rehabilitation, these correlates were more prevalent in females than males. Correlates differed by sex. The threshold for when age affected achieving VO2max or VT1 on the cycle CPET was earlier for females (>50 yrs) than males (>70 yrs) with no difference on treadmill (>80 yrs, both).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While most patients achieved VO2max or VT1 on the CPET, females were 3 times less likely to achieve VO2max or VT1 than males. Strategies to improve utility of CPETs for females such as alternative exercise test protocols and investigation into underlying mechanisms for effects of depressive symptoms should be conducted.</p>","PeriodicalId":9555,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2024.11.022","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite the importance of objective measures for prescribing aerobic exercise for mitigating cardiovascular risk in people with coronary artery disease (CAD), no study has examined sex differences in the utility of the cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) for developing the exercise prescription.

Methods: CPET results from 1,352 females and 5,875 males with CAD were analyzed to determine if there was a sex difference in achieving maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) or an identifiable first ventilatory threshold (VT1). Secondary outcomes were to determine correlates of not achieving VO2max or VT1 in all patients and males and females separately.

Results: A greater proportion of males than females achieved VO2max or VT1 (89.7% vs 71.3%; p<0.001), specifically achieving VO2max (40.2% vs 26.7%; p<.001) and VT1 (88.0% vs 69.2%; p<.001). The most influential correlates of not achieving VO2max or VT1 were female sex (OR=3.1:95% CI, 2.6-3.7), age >60 yrs, tested on treadmill vs cycle, depressive symptoms, and a secondary heart failure diagnosis. At entry to cardiac rehabilitation, these correlates were more prevalent in females than males. Correlates differed by sex. The threshold for when age affected achieving VO2max or VT1 on the cycle CPET was earlier for females (>50 yrs) than males (>70 yrs) with no difference on treadmill (>80 yrs, both).

Conclusions: While most patients achieved VO2max or VT1 on the CPET, females were 3 times less likely to achieve VO2max or VT1 than males. Strategies to improve utility of CPETs for females such as alternative exercise test protocols and investigation into underlying mechanisms for effects of depressive symptoms should be conducted.

心肺运动测试在心脏康复入门时用于开具运动处方的性别差异及相关性。
背景:尽管客观测量方法对于开具有氧运动处方以降低冠状动脉疾病(CAD)患者的心血管风险非常重要,但还没有研究对心肺运动测试(CPET)在开具运动处方方面的性别差异进行调查:分析了 1,352 名女性和 5,875 名男性冠心病患者的 CPET 结果,以确定在达到最大摄氧量(VO2max)或可识别的第一通气阈值(VT1)方面是否存在性别差异。次要结果是确定所有患者以及男性和女性患者未达到 VO2max 或 VT1 的相关性:结果:达到 VO2max 或 VT1 的男性比例高于女性(89.7% vs 71.3%;P60),在跑步机与自行车、抑郁症状和继发性心力衰竭诊断中进行测试的男性比例高于女性。在开始心脏康复时,这些相关因素在女性中比在男性中更为普遍。相关因素因性别而异。女性(>50 岁)比男性(>70 岁)更早达到循环 CPET 达到 VO2max 或 VT1 的阈值,而跑步机(>80 岁,两者均是)则没有差异:结论:虽然大多数患者都能在 CPET 上达到 VO2max 或 VT1,但女性达到 VO2max 或 VT1 的几率是男性的 3 倍。应采取策略提高 CPET 对女性的实用性,如采用其他运动测试方案和研究抑郁症状影响的潜在机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Canadian Journal of Cardiology
Canadian Journal of Cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
8.10%
发文量
546
审稿时长
32 days
期刊介绍: The Canadian Journal of Cardiology (CJC) is the official journal of the Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS). The CJC is a vehicle for the international dissemination of new knowledge in cardiology and cardiovascular science, particularly serving as the major venue for Canadian cardiovascular medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信