Intensive treatment of triple negative breast cancer with residual positive axillary lymph node after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Xing Wang, Yingjian He, Jinfeng Li, Tianfeng Wang, Zhaoqing Fan, Tao Ouyang
{"title":"Intensive treatment of triple negative breast cancer with residual positive axillary lymph node after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.","authors":"Xing Wang, Yingjian He, Jinfeng Li, Tianfeng Wang, Zhaoqing Fan, Tao Ouyang","doi":"10.1186/s12905-024-03441-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) with anthracycline sequential paclitaxel is the standard regimen for triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), while TNBC with residual positive axillary lymph node after standard NAC indicates poor prognosis. There is no evidence that vinorelbine alone can be used as an adjuvant intensive therapy for such patients at present.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We recruited TNBC patients with clinical stage of T1-4/N1-3/M0, who received NAC with 8 cycles of anthracycline sequential paclitaxel and had residual tumor in axillary lymph node after surgery. The patients were randomly divided into adjuvant intensive treatment group (Group A) and control group (Group B). The patients in group A received vinorelbine at a dose of 25 mg/m<sup>2</sup> on days 1/8 of a 21-day cycle with four planned cycles, while the control group received no therapy. Stratified according to the Miller-Payne system of the primary lesion (G1-2/G3-5). The endpoints included distant disease-free survival (DDFS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), and safety.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 22 eligible patients were enrolled in this study, the 3-year DDFS and RFS rates in the group A were significantly higher than those in group B (90.0% vs. 42.4%, p = 0.022, both) at a median follow-up of 36 months. All patients in the group A completed the scheme in full dose, and no grade 3/4 adverse event occurred.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TNBC patients with residual positive axillary lymph nodes after NAC of anthracycline sequential paclitaxel could benefit from adjuvant intensive therapy of vinorelbine with a good safety.</p><p><strong>Trail registration: </strong>The study was registered on the Clinical Trial registry website ( https://register.</p><p><strong>Clinicaltrials: </strong>gov , NCT03270007) (Registration Date: 08/30/2017).</p>","PeriodicalId":9204,"journal":{"name":"BMC Women's Health","volume":"24 1","pages":"629"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11600719/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Women's Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-024-03441-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) with anthracycline sequential paclitaxel is the standard regimen for triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), while TNBC with residual positive axillary lymph node after standard NAC indicates poor prognosis. There is no evidence that vinorelbine alone can be used as an adjuvant intensive therapy for such patients at present.

Methods: We recruited TNBC patients with clinical stage of T1-4/N1-3/M0, who received NAC with 8 cycles of anthracycline sequential paclitaxel and had residual tumor in axillary lymph node after surgery. The patients were randomly divided into adjuvant intensive treatment group (Group A) and control group (Group B). The patients in group A received vinorelbine at a dose of 25 mg/m2 on days 1/8 of a 21-day cycle with four planned cycles, while the control group received no therapy. Stratified according to the Miller-Payne system of the primary lesion (G1-2/G3-5). The endpoints included distant disease-free survival (DDFS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), and safety.

Results: A total of 22 eligible patients were enrolled in this study, the 3-year DDFS and RFS rates in the group A were significantly higher than those in group B (90.0% vs. 42.4%, p = 0.022, both) at a median follow-up of 36 months. All patients in the group A completed the scheme in full dose, and no grade 3/4 adverse event occurred.

Conclusions: TNBC patients with residual positive axillary lymph nodes after NAC of anthracycline sequential paclitaxel could benefit from adjuvant intensive therapy of vinorelbine with a good safety.

Trail registration: The study was registered on the Clinical Trial registry website ( https://register.

Clinicaltrials: gov , NCT03270007) (Registration Date: 08/30/2017).

对新辅助化疗后腋窝淋巴结残留阳性的三阴性乳腺癌进行强化治疗。
背景:蒽环类紫杉醇序贯新辅助化疗(NAC)是治疗三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)的标准方案,而标准NAC后残留腋窝淋巴结阳性的TNBC预后较差。目前没有证据表明单用长春瑞滨可作为此类患者的辅助强化治疗:我们招募了临床分期为T1-4/N1-3/M0的TNBC患者,这些患者接受了8个周期的蒽环类紫杉醇序贯新农合治疗,术后腋窝淋巴结有残留肿瘤。患者被随机分为辅助强化治疗组(A 组)和对照组(B 组)。A组患者在21天周期的第1/8天接受剂量为25毫克/平方米的长春瑞滨治疗,计划治疗4个周期,而对照组不接受治疗。根据原发病灶的米勒-佩恩系统(G1-2/G3-5)进行分层。终点包括无远处疾病生存期(DDFS)、无复发生存期(RFS)、总生存期(OS)和安全性:在中位随访36个月时,A组的3年无远处疾病生存率和无复发生存率明显高于B组(均为90.0%对42.4%,P=0.022)。A组所有患者均完成了全剂量治疗,且未发生3/4级不良反应:结论:蒽环类紫杉醇序贯疗法后腋窝淋巴结残留阳性的 TNBC 患者可从长春瑞滨的辅助强化治疗中获益,且安全性良好:该研究已在临床试验注册网站( https://register.Clinicaltrials: gov , NCT03270007)上注册(注册日期:2017年08月30日)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Women's Health
BMC Women's Health OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
444
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Women''s Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the health and wellbeing of adolescent girls and women, with a particular focus on the physical, mental, and emotional health of women in developed and developing nations. The journal welcomes submissions on women''s public health issues, health behaviours, breast cancer, gynecological diseases, mental health and health promotion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信