Melissopalynological methodologies for investigating honey samples - a critical approach.

IF 1.1 4区 综合性期刊 Q3 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciencias Pub Date : 2024-11-25 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1590/0001-3765202420230703
Aline Nunes, Cleiciane Rita, João Vitor Bromer, Giovanna B Azambuja, Denise N Araújo, Sidnei Moura, Marcelo Maraschin
{"title":"Melissopalynological methodologies for investigating honey samples - a critical approach.","authors":"Aline Nunes, Cleiciane Rita, João Vitor Bromer, Giovanna B Azambuja, Denise N Araújo, Sidnei Moura, Marcelo Maraschin","doi":"10.1590/0001-3765202420230703","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Melissopalynological techniques are used in the analysis of pollen grains. However, the adoption of methodologies considering cost-effectiveness, shorter preparation time and lesser toxic procedures for researchers is relevant. Thus, this study aimed to analyze different melissopalynological methodologies in polyfloral honey samples. Three melissopalynological protocols were applied to the samples using alcian blue dye, basic fuchsin, and the traditional acetolysis methodology without dye. After preparing the pollen samples, and analyzing them under an optical microscope, six botanical families were recorded, e.g., Amaranthaceae, Asteraceae, Bignoniaceae, Fabaceae, Malvaceae, and Myrtaceae. The methodologies investigated proved to be efficient for detecting pollen structures and identifying botanical families thereof. The alcian blue dye-based protocol allowed a greater separation and discrimination of pollen grains as compared to the basic fuchsin and acetolysis ones, where pollen conglomerates were often identified. Even though acetolysis has been the most used method in melissopalynological studies, it has been claimed to offer risks to users due to the manipulation of corrosive and toxic solvents (i.e., H2SO4), also being lesser cost-effective and more time-consuming. Thus, considering the cost-effectiveness, the alcian blue dye and basic fuchsin-based methods seem to be preferred, being as efficient as acetolysis for identifying pollen grains.</p>","PeriodicalId":7776,"journal":{"name":"Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciencias","volume":"96 suppl 3","pages":"e20230703"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciencias","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765202420230703","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Melissopalynological techniques are used in the analysis of pollen grains. However, the adoption of methodologies considering cost-effectiveness, shorter preparation time and lesser toxic procedures for researchers is relevant. Thus, this study aimed to analyze different melissopalynological methodologies in polyfloral honey samples. Three melissopalynological protocols were applied to the samples using alcian blue dye, basic fuchsin, and the traditional acetolysis methodology without dye. After preparing the pollen samples, and analyzing them under an optical microscope, six botanical families were recorded, e.g., Amaranthaceae, Asteraceae, Bignoniaceae, Fabaceae, Malvaceae, and Myrtaceae. The methodologies investigated proved to be efficient for detecting pollen structures and identifying botanical families thereof. The alcian blue dye-based protocol allowed a greater separation and discrimination of pollen grains as compared to the basic fuchsin and acetolysis ones, where pollen conglomerates were often identified. Even though acetolysis has been the most used method in melissopalynological studies, it has been claimed to offer risks to users due to the manipulation of corrosive and toxic solvents (i.e., H2SO4), also being lesser cost-effective and more time-consuming. Thus, considering the cost-effectiveness, the alcian blue dye and basic fuchsin-based methods seem to be preferred, being as efficient as acetolysis for identifying pollen grains.

调查蜂蜜样本的 Melissopalynological 方法--一种重要的方法。
花粉粒分析采用的是 Melissopalynological 技术。然而,考虑到成本效益、更短的制备时间和对研究人员毒性更小的程序,采用相关的方法是有意义的。因此,本研究旨在分析多花蜂蜜样本中的不同花粉学方法。研究人员对样品采用了三种花粉学方法,分别是使用阿尔金山蓝染料、碱性品红和不使用染料的传统乙醇溶解法。在制备花粉样本并在光学显微镜下进行分析后,记录了六个植物科,如苋科、菊科、木犀科、豆科、锦葵科和桃金娘科。事实证明,所研究的方法可有效检测花粉结构并识别其植物科属。与碱性品红和乙醇溶解法相比,基于阿尔金山蓝染料的方法能更有效地分离和鉴别花粉粒,而碱性品红和乙醇溶解法往往能鉴别出花粉团块。尽管乙酰溶解法一直是花粉学研究中最常用的方法,但据称这种方法因使用腐蚀性和有毒溶剂(如 H2SO4)而给使用者带来风险,而且成本效益较低,耗时较长。因此,考虑到成本效益,基于藻蓝染色法和碱性人参皂苷的方法似乎更受青睐,其识别花粉粒的效率不亚于乙醇溶解法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciencias
Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciencias 综合性期刊-综合性期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
347
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Brazilian Academy of Sciences (BAS) publishes its journal, Annals of the Brazilian Academy of Sciences (AABC, in its Brazilianportuguese acronym ), every 3 months, being the oldest journal in Brazil with conkinuous distribukion, daking back to 1929. This scienkihic journal aims to publish the advances in scienkihic research from both Brazilian and foreigner scienkists, who work in the main research centers in the whole world, always looking for excellence. Essenkially a mulkidisciplinary journal, the AABC cover, with both reviews and original researches, the diverse areas represented in the Academy, such as Biology, Physics, Biomedical Sciences, Chemistry, Agrarian Sciences, Engineering, Mathemakics, Social, Health and Earth Sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信