Does Preoperative Renal Tumour Biopsy Impact Trifecta Achievement in Partial Nephrectomy?

IF 0.3 4区 医学 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Muhammed Fatih Simsekoglu, Muhammet Demirbilek, Ahmet Vural, Ugur Aferin, Burcin Tunc, Sinharib Citgez, Cetin Demirdag
{"title":"Does Preoperative Renal Tumour Biopsy Impact Trifecta Achievement in Partial Nephrectomy?","authors":"Muhammed Fatih Simsekoglu, Muhammet Demirbilek, Ahmet Vural, Ugur Aferin, Burcin Tunc, Sinharib Citgez, Cetin Demirdag","doi":"10.1055/a-2448-1029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We aimed to evaluate the effect of renal tumour biopsy (RTB) on trifecta criteria achievement in patients treated with open partial nephrectomy (OPN).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who were diagnosed with renal cancer and underwent OPN between 2012 and 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. The RTB group consisted of patients who underwent RTB before OPN, while the non-RTB group consisted of those who did not undergo RTB. No matching method was employed since parameters such as tumour size and Padua score were comparable between the two groups. The primary outcome was trifecta achievement, defined as negative surgical margins, warm ischemia time (WIT) <25 minutes, and no complications. Secondary outcomes were the clinicopathologic and survival outcomes of both groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 137 (82.03%) patients in the non-RTB group and 30 (17.96%) patients in the RTB group. The median postoperative follow-up was 45 (24-141) months. The median tumour size was 3.4 (1-7) cm and 3 (1.4-7) cm in the non-RTB group and RTB group, respectively (p=0.282). Seventy-five of the 137 (54.76%) patients in the non-RTB group and 16 of the 30 (53.3%) patients in the RTB group achieved the trifecta criteria (p=0.878). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of metastasis-free survival (p=0.332) or overall survival (p=0.359) at 24 months. The rate of intraparenchymal lymphovascular invasion was significantly higher in the RTB group (16.6%) than in the non-RTB group (2.92%) (p=0.013).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study indicated that trifecta achievement rates were comparable between patients who did and those who did not undergo RTB. Consequently, RTB can be safely performed in renal cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":7513,"journal":{"name":"Aktuelle Urologie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aktuelle Urologie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2448-1029","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: We aimed to evaluate the effect of renal tumour biopsy (RTB) on trifecta criteria achievement in patients treated with open partial nephrectomy (OPN).

Methods: Patients who were diagnosed with renal cancer and underwent OPN between 2012 and 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. The RTB group consisted of patients who underwent RTB before OPN, while the non-RTB group consisted of those who did not undergo RTB. No matching method was employed since parameters such as tumour size and Padua score were comparable between the two groups. The primary outcome was trifecta achievement, defined as negative surgical margins, warm ischemia time (WIT) <25 minutes, and no complications. Secondary outcomes were the clinicopathologic and survival outcomes of both groups.

Results: There were 137 (82.03%) patients in the non-RTB group and 30 (17.96%) patients in the RTB group. The median postoperative follow-up was 45 (24-141) months. The median tumour size was 3.4 (1-7) cm and 3 (1.4-7) cm in the non-RTB group and RTB group, respectively (p=0.282). Seventy-five of the 137 (54.76%) patients in the non-RTB group and 16 of the 30 (53.3%) patients in the RTB group achieved the trifecta criteria (p=0.878). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of metastasis-free survival (p=0.332) or overall survival (p=0.359) at 24 months. The rate of intraparenchymal lymphovascular invasion was significantly higher in the RTB group (16.6%) than in the non-RTB group (2.92%) (p=0.013).

Conclusions: Our study indicated that trifecta achievement rates were comparable between patients who did and those who did not undergo RTB. Consequently, RTB can be safely performed in renal cancer.

术前肾肿瘤活检是否会影响肾部分切除术的三连胜?
目的:我们旨在评估肾肿瘤活检(RTB)对开放性肾部分切除术(OPN)患者达到三联标准的影响:我们对2012年至2023年间确诊为肾癌并接受OPN治疗的患者进行了回顾性研究。RTB组包括在OPN前接受RTB的患者,而非RTB组包括未接受RTB的患者。由于两组患者的肿瘤大小和帕多瓦评分等参数具有可比性,因此没有采用匹配方法。主要结果是三联征的实现,即手术边缘阴性、温暖缺血时间(WIT) 结果:非 RTB 组有 137 名患者(82.03%),RTB 组有 30 名患者(17.96%)。术后随访时间中位数为 45(24-141)个月。非RTB组和RTB组肿瘤大小的中位数分别为3.4(1-7)厘米和3(1.4-7)厘米(P=0.282)。非 RTB 组的 137 位患者中有 75 位(54.76%)达到了三联标准,RTB 组的 30 位患者中有 16 位(53.3%)达到了三联标准(P=0.878)。在24个月的无转移生存期(p=0.332)或总生存期(p=0.359)方面,两组之间无统计学差异。RTB组的实质内淋巴管侵犯率(16.6%)明显高于非RTB组(2.92%)(P=0.013):我们的研究表明,接受和未接受RTB治疗的患者的三联征达标率相当。因此,肾癌患者可以安全地进行 RTB。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Aktuelle Urologie
Aktuelle Urologie 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
33.30%
发文量
104
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Die entscheidenden Ergebnisse der internationalen Forschung – für Sie auf den Punkt zusammengefasst und kritisch kommentiert Übersichtsarbeiten zu den maßgeblichen Themen der täglichen Praxis Auf dem Laufenden über die klinische Forschung durch interessante Originalien CME-Punkte sammeln mit der Rubrik "Operative Techniken" In jeder Ausgabe: Techniken wichtiger Standard-OPs – Schritt für Schritt Erstklassige OP-Skizzen mit verständlichen Erläuterungen
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信