Field trial guidelines for evaluating enhanced efficiency fertilizers

Sarah E. Lyons, D. Brian Arnall, Dana Ashford-Kornburger, Sylvie M. Brouder, Erik Christian, Achim Dobermann, Stephan M. Haefele, Jason Haegele, Matthew J. Helmers, Virginia L. Jin, Andrew J. Margenot, Josh M. McGrath, Kelly T. Morgan, T. Scott Murrell, Deanna L. Osmond, David E. Pelster, Nathan A. Slaton, Peter A. Vadas, Rodney T. Venterea, Jeffrey J. Volenec, Claudia Wagner-Riddle
{"title":"Field trial guidelines for evaluating enhanced efficiency fertilizers","authors":"Sarah E. Lyons,&nbsp;D. Brian Arnall,&nbsp;Dana Ashford-Kornburger,&nbsp;Sylvie M. Brouder,&nbsp;Erik Christian,&nbsp;Achim Dobermann,&nbsp;Stephan M. Haefele,&nbsp;Jason Haegele,&nbsp;Matthew J. Helmers,&nbsp;Virginia L. Jin,&nbsp;Andrew J. Margenot,&nbsp;Josh M. McGrath,&nbsp;Kelly T. Morgan,&nbsp;T. Scott Murrell,&nbsp;Deanna L. Osmond,&nbsp;David E. Pelster,&nbsp;Nathan A. Slaton,&nbsp;Peter A. Vadas,&nbsp;Rodney T. Venterea,&nbsp;Jeffrey J. Volenec,&nbsp;Claudia Wagner-Riddle","doi":"10.1002/saj2.20787","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>There are many fertilizer additives and alternatives that aim to increase plant nutrient use efficiency and reduce nutrient losses to the environment, here referred to collectively as enhanced efficiency fertilizers (EEFs). However, there is often insufficient published scientific field trial results across a variety of locations, climates, soils, cropping systems, and management scenarios to prove their efficacy and conditions for use. Guidelines for common minimum datasets and data stewardship in evaluating the agronomic performance and environmental impact of EEFs are needed for researchers to follow. Such guidelines will improve hypothesis testing centered on product efficacy and provide producers with guidance on how these technologies function and perform when integrated with other management practices within the 4R Nutrient Stewardship Framework. A scientific committee was formed to develop a set of protocol guidelines for evaluating EEFs in replicated, plot-based field trials on an international scale. The guidelines are composed of experimental design and core metadata, crop and soil analyses, environmental loss measurements, and data stewardship, and include both recommended and required components to allow for flexibility and adaptability depending on the trial location, objectives, infrastructure capacity, product type, and depth of understanding of the potential EEF efficacy. This approach will ensure consistency and compatibility in experimental design and data collection to support data integration, analysis, and reuse leading to large-scale impact and end-user confidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":101043,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America","volume":"89 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/saj2.20787","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/saj2.20787","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There are many fertilizer additives and alternatives that aim to increase plant nutrient use efficiency and reduce nutrient losses to the environment, here referred to collectively as enhanced efficiency fertilizers (EEFs). However, there is often insufficient published scientific field trial results across a variety of locations, climates, soils, cropping systems, and management scenarios to prove their efficacy and conditions for use. Guidelines for common minimum datasets and data stewardship in evaluating the agronomic performance and environmental impact of EEFs are needed for researchers to follow. Such guidelines will improve hypothesis testing centered on product efficacy and provide producers with guidance on how these technologies function and perform when integrated with other management practices within the 4R Nutrient Stewardship Framework. A scientific committee was formed to develop a set of protocol guidelines for evaluating EEFs in replicated, plot-based field trials on an international scale. The guidelines are composed of experimental design and core metadata, crop and soil analyses, environmental loss measurements, and data stewardship, and include both recommended and required components to allow for flexibility and adaptability depending on the trial location, objectives, infrastructure capacity, product type, and depth of understanding of the potential EEF efficacy. This approach will ensure consistency and compatibility in experimental design and data collection to support data integration, analysis, and reuse leading to large-scale impact and end-user confidence.

Abstract Image

评估增效肥料的田间试验指南
有许多肥料添加剂和替代品旨在提高植物养分利用效率并减少环境中的养分损失,在此统称为增效肥料(EEFs)。然而,在不同地点、不同气候、不同土壤、不同耕作制度和不同管理方案下进行的田间科学试验结果往往不足以证明其功效和使用条件。在评估 EEFs 的农艺性能和环境影响时,研究人员需要遵循通用的最低数据集和数据管理准则。这些指南将改进以产品功效为中心的假设检验,并为生产者提供指导,使其了解这些技术在与 4R 养分管理框架内的其他管理措施相结合时如何发挥作用和表现。我们成立了一个科学委员会,以制定一套方案指南,用于在国际范围内以小区为基础的重复田间试验中评估 EEF。该指南由试验设计和核心元数据、作物和土壤分析、环境损失测量以及数据管理组成,包括建议和要求的部分,以便根据试验地点、目标、基础设施能力、产品类型以及对 EEF 潜在功效的理解深度,灵活调整。这种方法将确保试验设计和数据收集的一致性和兼容性,以支持数据整合、分析和再利用,从而产生大规模影响,增强最终用户的信心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信