Lignocellulosic biomass valorisation: a review of feedstocks, processes and potential value chains and their implications for the decision-making process†

Britt Segers, Philippe Nimmegeers, Marc Spiller, Giorgio Tofani, Edita Jasiukaitytė-Grojzdek, Elina Dace, Timo Kikas, Jorge M. Marchetti, Milena Rajić, Güray Yildiz and Pieter Billen
{"title":"Lignocellulosic biomass valorisation: a review of feedstocks, processes and potential value chains and their implications for the decision-making process†","authors":"Britt Segers, Philippe Nimmegeers, Marc Spiller, Giorgio Tofani, Edita Jasiukaitytė-Grojzdek, Elina Dace, Timo Kikas, Jorge M. Marchetti, Milena Rajić, Güray Yildiz and Pieter Billen","doi":"10.1039/D4SU00342J","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Several studies have reported the importance of transforming the current fossil-based economy into a bio-economy. Lignocellulosic biomass, as the most abundant renewable feedstock, has high potential. However, in practice, its use is limited to energy generation. This study aims to provide an overview of the potential lignocellulosic valorisation pathways and identify the next steps that should be taken to move towards a bio-economy. The study reviews the lignocellulosic biomass feedstocks and their compositional differences, depending on the type, valorisation processes, and value chains that can be created by selecting the respective valorisation processes. The study shows the abundance of pathways that can be created when attempting to link lignocellulosic biomass with a high diversity of compositions to the many potential end-products that can be created. Due to this abundance, selecting the optimal biomass-end-product combinations for the development of a sustainable bio-economy is challenging. Current state-of-the-art process-based assessment methods (TEA/LCA) have limited genericity, as they are only valid for specific processes at a specific time and place. As a result, using these types of assessments to try to find optimal biomass-end-product combinations would require too much time, data, and expertise. This creates the need to shift away from process-based assessments to state-based assessments, where the path of least thermodynamic resistance is sought.</p>","PeriodicalId":74745,"journal":{"name":"RSC sustainability","volume":" 12","pages":" 3730-3749"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2024/su/d4su00342j?page=search","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RSC sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2024/su/d4su00342j","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Several studies have reported the importance of transforming the current fossil-based economy into a bio-economy. Lignocellulosic biomass, as the most abundant renewable feedstock, has high potential. However, in practice, its use is limited to energy generation. This study aims to provide an overview of the potential lignocellulosic valorisation pathways and identify the next steps that should be taken to move towards a bio-economy. The study reviews the lignocellulosic biomass feedstocks and their compositional differences, depending on the type, valorisation processes, and value chains that can be created by selecting the respective valorisation processes. The study shows the abundance of pathways that can be created when attempting to link lignocellulosic biomass with a high diversity of compositions to the many potential end-products that can be created. Due to this abundance, selecting the optimal biomass-end-product combinations for the development of a sustainable bio-economy is challenging. Current state-of-the-art process-based assessment methods (TEA/LCA) have limited genericity, as they are only valid for specific processes at a specific time and place. As a result, using these types of assessments to try to find optimal biomass-end-product combinations would require too much time, data, and expertise. This creates the need to shift away from process-based assessments to state-based assessments, where the path of least thermodynamic resistance is sought.

Abstract Image

木质纤维素生物质增值:原料、工艺和潜在价值链及其对决策过程的影响综述†。
一些研究报告指出,将目前以化石为基础的经济转变为生物经济非常重要。木质纤维素生物质作为最丰富的可再生原料,具有很大的潜力。然而,在实践中,其用途仅限于能源生产。本研究旨在概述潜在的木质纤维素价值化途径,并确定迈向生物经济应采取的下一步措施。研究回顾了木质纤维素生物质原料及其成分差异,具体取决于类型、价值化流程以及通过选择相应的价值化流程可以创建的价值链。这项研究表明,当试图将成分高度多样化的木质纤维素生物质与许多潜在的最终产品联系起来时,可以创造出丰富的途径。由于这种多样性,为发展可持续生物经济选择最佳的生物质-终端产品组合具有挑战性。目前最先进的基于工艺的评估方法(TEA/LCA)的通用性有限,因为它们只适用于特定时间和地点的特定工艺。因此,使用这些评估方法来寻找最佳的生物质-终端产品组合需要大量的时间、数据和专业知识。这就需要从基于过程的评估转向基于状态的评估,即寻找热力学阻力最小的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信