Early physiotherapy referral for low back pain reduces healthcare utilisation for advanced imaging and specialist spine surgery consultations.

Vikaesh Moorthy, Pei Gin Ong, Jacob Yoong-Leong Oh
{"title":"Early physiotherapy referral for low back pain reduces healthcare utilisation for advanced imaging and specialist spine surgery consultations.","authors":"Vikaesh Moorthy, Pei Gin Ong, Jacob Yoong-Leong Oh","doi":"10.4103/singaporemedj.SMJ-2024-023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Low back pain (LBP) is one of the most common presenting complaints among patients and the costliest orthopaedic condition. This study aimed to compare the healthcare utilisation rates of advanced imaging and specialist consultations for LBP between patients presenting with early physiotherapy (EPT) before specialist review and routine physiotherapy (RPT) after specialist review.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive patients who (n = 311) had been referred to specialist spine surgery for LBP in 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Baseline demographics, healthcare utilisation rates and clinical outcomes were compared between those who attended EPT before spine surgery consultation and those who attended RPT after specialist consultation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences in baseline demographics or clinical outcomes of Visual Analogue Scale pain scores, EuroQol 5-Dimension scores and surgery rates between the EPT (n = 183) and RPT (n = 128) groups. At 6 months follow-up, EPT was associated with significantly lower magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) rates (P = 0.026), decreased likelihood of requiring MRI (odds ratio [OR] 0.865, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.757-0.990), reduced number of specialist spine surgery consultations (P < 0.001), decreased likelihood of requiring additional specialist consultations (OR 0.770, 95% CI 0.655-0.905), fewer physiotherapy sessions (P = 0.001) and decreased likelihood of requiring additional physiotherapy sessions (OR 0.835, 95% CI 0.553-1.261).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Early physiotherapy reduces the (a) overall treatment duration from the first referral by the primary physician, (b) number of advanced imaging ordered (and thus, associated imaging costs), and (c) total number of clinic and therapy sessions, and it is safe and allows patients to achieve comparable functional outcomes to their counterparts undergoing RPT. These findings support the implementation of EPT for patients with LBP to reduce healthcare utilisation and associated costs for patients, providers and healthcare systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":94289,"journal":{"name":"Singapore medical journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Singapore medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/singaporemedj.SMJ-2024-023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Low back pain (LBP) is one of the most common presenting complaints among patients and the costliest orthopaedic condition. This study aimed to compare the healthcare utilisation rates of advanced imaging and specialist consultations for LBP between patients presenting with early physiotherapy (EPT) before specialist review and routine physiotherapy (RPT) after specialist review.

Methods: Consecutive patients who (n = 311) had been referred to specialist spine surgery for LBP in 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Baseline demographics, healthcare utilisation rates and clinical outcomes were compared between those who attended EPT before spine surgery consultation and those who attended RPT after specialist consultation.

Results: There were no significant differences in baseline demographics or clinical outcomes of Visual Analogue Scale pain scores, EuroQol 5-Dimension scores and surgery rates between the EPT (n = 183) and RPT (n = 128) groups. At 6 months follow-up, EPT was associated with significantly lower magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) rates (P = 0.026), decreased likelihood of requiring MRI (odds ratio [OR] 0.865, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.757-0.990), reduced number of specialist spine surgery consultations (P < 0.001), decreased likelihood of requiring additional specialist consultations (OR 0.770, 95% CI 0.655-0.905), fewer physiotherapy sessions (P = 0.001) and decreased likelihood of requiring additional physiotherapy sessions (OR 0.835, 95% CI 0.553-1.261).

Conclusions: Early physiotherapy reduces the (a) overall treatment duration from the first referral by the primary physician, (b) number of advanced imaging ordered (and thus, associated imaging costs), and (c) total number of clinic and therapy sessions, and it is safe and allows patients to achieve comparable functional outcomes to their counterparts undergoing RPT. These findings support the implementation of EPT for patients with LBP to reduce healthcare utilisation and associated costs for patients, providers and healthcare systems.

腰背痛患者及早转诊物理治疗,可减少先进影像学检查和脊柱外科专家会诊的使用率。
导言:腰背痛(LBP)是患者最常见的主诉之一,也是花费最高的骨科疾病。本研究旨在比较在专科复查前接受早期物理治疗(EPT)和专科复查后接受常规物理治疗(RPT)的腰背痛患者的先进成像和专科会诊的医疗利用率:对2021年因腰痛转诊至脊柱外科专科的连续患者(n = 311)进行回顾性研究。比较了脊柱手术会诊前参加 EPT 的患者和专家会诊后参加 RPT 的患者的基线人口统计学、医疗保健使用率和临床结果:结果:EPT 组(n = 183)和 RPT 组(n = 128)在基线人口统计学和临床结果(视觉模拟量表疼痛评分、EuroQol 5 维评分和手术率)方面无明显差异。在 6 个月的随访中,EPT 与磁共振成像(MRI)率显著降低(P = 0.026)、需要磁共振成像的可能性降低(几率比 [OR] 0.865,95% 置信区间 [CI] 0.757-0.990)、脊柱外科专家会诊次数减少(P < 0.001),需要额外专家会诊的可能性降低(OR 0.770,95% CI 0.655-0.905),物理治疗次数减少(P = 0.001),需要额外物理治疗次数的可能性降低(OR 0.835,95% CI 0.553-1.261):结论:早期物理治疗缩短了(a)从主治医生首次转诊开始的总体治疗时间,(b)所需的高级影像学检查次数(以及相关的影像学检查费用),以及(c)门诊和治疗的总次数。这些研究结果支持对腰椎间盘突出症患者实施 EPT,以减少患者、医疗服务提供者和医疗系统的医疗利用率和相关成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信