Experiences and Perspectives of the COVID-19 Pandemic and Vaccinations in Culturally and Linguistically Diverse (CALD) Populations in Australia: A Qualitative Study.

IF 1 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Cureus Pub Date : 2024-11-25 eCollection Date: 2024-11-01 DOI:10.7759/cureus.74463
Tasnia Rafi, Mohammad A Rahman
{"title":"Experiences and Perspectives of the COVID-19 Pandemic and Vaccinations in Culturally and Linguistically Diverse (CALD) Populations in Australia: A Qualitative Study.","authors":"Tasnia Rafi, Mohammad A Rahman","doi":"10.7759/cureus.74463","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Qualitative research surrounding the impacts of COVID-19 and vaccine hesitancy has been extensively studied in the European context; however, limited research has been conducted within communities in the Australian context. This research paper highlights the issues experienced by culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) members during the COVID-19 pandemic and vaccination rollout. The purpose of this study is to strengthen our understanding of the challenges experienced by CALD communities and enable healthcare policies to be developed and implemented to prevent these communities from being disadvantaged in a healthcare crisis. The methods of this study include focus group sessions with 12 participants from CALD backgrounds across different states including Victoria, Northern Territory, and Queensland. They were divided into two separate Zoom sessions and aimed to amplify the voices in Victoria, as the state had the nation's longest and most challenging COVID-19 lockdown laws. Key findings of the study highlighted the language barriers, racism, and lack of cultural awareness experienced among CALD communities during the pandemic. Additionally, there was a significant division in views and experiences within CALD communities and families. Social media played a prominent role in dividing the perceptions and understanding of health information during the pandemic. Participants were motivated to be vaccinated due to workplace protocols or to protect their family members and move toward normality. Lastly, the government's mandatory vaccination policies limited personal choice, resulting in a loss of skilled workers and pressured some participants into making healthcare decisions within a limited period of time. The study's findings reflect that the CALD communities and families were disproportionately impacted during the COVID-19 pandemic and vaccination rollout, further highlighting and adding to the health inequities among CALD communities in Australia.</p>","PeriodicalId":93960,"journal":{"name":"Cureus","volume":"16 11","pages":"e74463"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11589507/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cureus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.74463","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Qualitative research surrounding the impacts of COVID-19 and vaccine hesitancy has been extensively studied in the European context; however, limited research has been conducted within communities in the Australian context. This research paper highlights the issues experienced by culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) members during the COVID-19 pandemic and vaccination rollout. The purpose of this study is to strengthen our understanding of the challenges experienced by CALD communities and enable healthcare policies to be developed and implemented to prevent these communities from being disadvantaged in a healthcare crisis. The methods of this study include focus group sessions with 12 participants from CALD backgrounds across different states including Victoria, Northern Territory, and Queensland. They were divided into two separate Zoom sessions and aimed to amplify the voices in Victoria, as the state had the nation's longest and most challenging COVID-19 lockdown laws. Key findings of the study highlighted the language barriers, racism, and lack of cultural awareness experienced among CALD communities during the pandemic. Additionally, there was a significant division in views and experiences within CALD communities and families. Social media played a prominent role in dividing the perceptions and understanding of health information during the pandemic. Participants were motivated to be vaccinated due to workplace protocols or to protect their family members and move toward normality. Lastly, the government's mandatory vaccination policies limited personal choice, resulting in a loss of skilled workers and pressured some participants into making healthcare decisions within a limited period of time. The study's findings reflect that the CALD communities and families were disproportionately impacted during the COVID-19 pandemic and vaccination rollout, further highlighting and adding to the health inequities among CALD communities in Australia.

澳大利亚文化和语言多样性 (CALD) 人口对 COVID-19 大流行和疫苗接种的经历和看法:定性研究。
围绕 COVID-19 的影响和疫苗接种犹豫的定性研究已在欧洲范围内广泛开展,但在澳大利亚的社区范围内开展的研究还很有限。本研究论文强调了在 COVID-19 大流行和疫苗接种推广期间,文化和语言多元化 (CALD) 成员所经历的问题。本研究的目的是加强我们对 CALD 社区所经历的挑战的了解,从而制定和实施医疗保健政策,防止这些社区在医疗保健危机中处于不利地位。本研究的方法包括与维多利亚州、北领地和昆士兰州等不同州的 12 名具有 CALD 背景的参与者进行焦点小组讨论。他们被分为两个独立的 Zoom 会议,旨在放大维多利亚州的声音,因为该州拥有全国最长、最具挑战性的 COVID-19 封锁法。研究的主要发现强调了大流行期间 CALD 社区所经历的语言障碍、种族主义和缺乏文化意识等问题。此外,CALD 社区和家庭在观点和经历上也存在着很大的分歧。在大流行期间,社交媒体在人们对健康信息的看法和理解方面发挥了显著作用。由于工作场所的规定,或为了保护家人和恢复正常生活,参与者都有接种疫苗的动机。最后,政府的强制疫苗接种政策限制了个人选择,导致熟练工人流失,并迫使一些参与者在有限的时间内做出医疗保健决定。研究结果表明,在 COVID-19 大流行和疫苗接种推广期间,CALD 社区和家庭受到的影响尤为严重,这进一步凸显并加剧了澳大利亚 CALD 社区在健康方面的不平等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信