An Overview of Continuing Medical Education/Continuing Professional Development Systems in Latin America: A Mixed Methods Assessment.

Journal of CME Pub Date : 2024-11-25 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1080/28338073.2024.2427765
Lawrence Sherman, Ricardo Leon-Borquez, Mildred Lopez, Kathy Chappell
{"title":"An Overview of Continuing Medical Education/Continuing Professional Development Systems in Latin America: A Mixed Methods Assessment.","authors":"Lawrence Sherman, Ricardo Leon-Borquez, Mildred Lopez, Kathy Chappell","doi":"10.1080/28338073.2024.2427765","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aims of this regional assessment of continuing medical education (CME)/continuing professional development (CPD) systems in Latin America were to describe the current requirements, if any, for physicians to engage in CME/CPD, explore perceptions of national CME/CPD systems from in-country subject matter experts (SMEs), to describe the perceptions of interprofessional continuing education (IPCE) and independent CME/CPD from in-country physicians and to provide recommendations that may be adopted by organisations/countries to improve the quality and effectiveness of their current CME/CPD systems and better meet their learners' needs. An assessment of 11 CME/CPD systems in Latin America was conducted using a mixed-methods approach that included 1:1 interviews with in-country SMEs and an electronic survey capturing qualitative and quantitative data from practicing in-country physicians. This assessment reflected countries with CME/CPD systems that are in various stages of maturity. Only three countries have systems that are self-regulated by the profession, several systems lack independence from pharmaceutical influence, and educational activities are described more in terms of traditional CME/CPD as compared to education focused on individual or team gaps or population health care needs. There was little description of incorporating learner self-assessment and evaluation of change and little focus on interprofessional education. This mixed-method assessment of 11 Latin American countries demonstrated CME/CPD systems that are developing in maturity. Participation was often voluntary, and there was relatively little regulation. Physicians overall have been resistant to regulation and have preferred to use a voluntary, incentive-based model. There was a relatively high degree of influence by the pharmaceutical industry. Affordability and access remain challenges. There is an opportunity to better tie country/population health outcomes to CME/CPD, implement interprofessional continuing education, increase faculty skills and learner engagement, and increase funding and access across geographic regions.</p>","PeriodicalId":73675,"journal":{"name":"Journal of CME","volume":"13 1","pages":"2427765"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11590182/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of CME","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/28338073.2024.2427765","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aims of this regional assessment of continuing medical education (CME)/continuing professional development (CPD) systems in Latin America were to describe the current requirements, if any, for physicians to engage in CME/CPD, explore perceptions of national CME/CPD systems from in-country subject matter experts (SMEs), to describe the perceptions of interprofessional continuing education (IPCE) and independent CME/CPD from in-country physicians and to provide recommendations that may be adopted by organisations/countries to improve the quality and effectiveness of their current CME/CPD systems and better meet their learners' needs. An assessment of 11 CME/CPD systems in Latin America was conducted using a mixed-methods approach that included 1:1 interviews with in-country SMEs and an electronic survey capturing qualitative and quantitative data from practicing in-country physicians. This assessment reflected countries with CME/CPD systems that are in various stages of maturity. Only three countries have systems that are self-regulated by the profession, several systems lack independence from pharmaceutical influence, and educational activities are described more in terms of traditional CME/CPD as compared to education focused on individual or team gaps or population health care needs. There was little description of incorporating learner self-assessment and evaluation of change and little focus on interprofessional education. This mixed-method assessment of 11 Latin American countries demonstrated CME/CPD systems that are developing in maturity. Participation was often voluntary, and there was relatively little regulation. Physicians overall have been resistant to regulation and have preferred to use a voluntary, incentive-based model. There was a relatively high degree of influence by the pharmaceutical industry. Affordability and access remain challenges. There is an opportunity to better tie country/population health outcomes to CME/CPD, implement interprofessional continuing education, increase faculty skills and learner engagement, and increase funding and access across geographic regions.

拉丁美洲继续医学教育/继续职业发展制度概览:混合方法评估》。
对拉丁美洲的继续医学教育(CME)/继续职业发展(CPD)体系进行区域评估的目的是,描述目前对医生参与继续医学教育/继续职业发展的要求(如果有的话),探讨国内主题专家(SMEs)对国家继续医学教育/继续职业发展体系的看法、描述国内医生对跨专业继续教育(IPCE)和独立继续医学教育/继续专业进修的看法,并提出可供组织/国家采纳的建议,以提高其现有继续医学教育/继续专业进修系统的质量和有效性,并更好地满足学员的需求。我们采用混合方法对拉丁美洲的 11 个继续医学教育/继续职业发展系统进行了评估,其中包括与国内中小型企业进行的 1:1 访谈,以及从国内执业医师处获取定性和定量数据的电子调查。这次评估反映了一些国家的继续医学教育/继续医学发展系统处于不同的成熟阶段。只有三个国家的系统是由行业自律的,有几个国家的系统没有独立于制药业的影响,教育活动更多地从传统的继续医学教育/继续职业发展的角度来描述,而不是侧重于个人或团队差距或人口保健需求的教育。对纳入学习者自我评估和评价变化的描述很少,对跨专业教育的关注也很少。这项对 11 个拉丁美洲国家进行的混合方法评估表明,继续医学教育/继续职业发展制度正日趋成熟。参与通常是自愿的,监管相对较少。总体而言,医生对监管有抵触情绪,他们更愿意使用自愿的、以激励为基础的模式。制药业的影响力相对较大。可负担性和可及性仍是挑战。我们有机会将国家/人口的健康成果与继续医学教育/继续职业培训更好地结合起来,实施跨专业继续教育,提高教师技能和学员参与度,并增加跨地域的资助和机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信