Prosthesis selection for reconstruction of superior vena cava: comparison of midterm patency rates.

0 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Han Cho, Suk Ho Sohn, Jae Woong Choi, Ho Young Hwang, Kyung Hwan Kim, Kwon Joong Na, Chang Hyun Kang
{"title":"Prosthesis selection for reconstruction of superior vena cava: comparison of midterm patency rates.","authors":"Han Cho, Suk Ho Sohn, Jae Woong Choi, Ho Young Hwang, Kyung Hwan Kim, Kwon Joong Na, Chang Hyun Kang","doi":"10.1093/icvts/ivae194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study compared the mid-term patency of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene grafts without rings versus that of bovine pericardial conduits used for superior vena cava reconstruction for various thoracic diseases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Among 80 patients who underwent superior vena cava resection and reconstruction between 2009 and 2023 at our institution, 31 patients who received polytetrafluoroethylene grafts without rings(Polytetrafluoroethylene group) and 28 patients who received bovine pericardial conduits(Bovine group) were enrolled. Median follow-up durations were 19.5 and 64.6 months in Polytetrafluoroethylene and Bovine groups, respectively. Primary outcome was midterm graft patency rate, and secondary outcomes were early and midterm clinical outcomes including all-cause mortality and superior vena cava reintervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Operative mortality was 1.7%. Cumulative incidence of all-cause mortality was not significantly difference between the groups. Graft occlusion was detected in 22 patients. Cumulative incidence of graft occlusion was 24.2%, 36.4%, 42.4%, 48.5%, and 60.6% at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years, respectively, in Bovine group, whereas no graft occlusion was observed in Polytetrafluoroethylene group(P=0.007). Although the incidence of graft occlusion was higher in Bovine group, cumulative incidence of reintervention was not significantly different between the groups(0.0% vs. 3.0% in Polytetrafluoroethylene vs. Bovine groups at 1 year, P=0.406). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that bovine pericardial conduit(Polytetrafluoroethylene graft as reference) and left brachiocephalic vein reconstruction(right brachiocephalic vein reconstruction as reference) were significant risk factors for graft occlusion.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In superior vena cava reconstruction, polytetrafluoroethylene grafts without rings were superior to bovine pericardial conduits in terms of midterm graft patency.</p>","PeriodicalId":73406,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivae194","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study compared the mid-term patency of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene grafts without rings versus that of bovine pericardial conduits used for superior vena cava reconstruction for various thoracic diseases.

Methods: Among 80 patients who underwent superior vena cava resection and reconstruction between 2009 and 2023 at our institution, 31 patients who received polytetrafluoroethylene grafts without rings(Polytetrafluoroethylene group) and 28 patients who received bovine pericardial conduits(Bovine group) were enrolled. Median follow-up durations were 19.5 and 64.6 months in Polytetrafluoroethylene and Bovine groups, respectively. Primary outcome was midterm graft patency rate, and secondary outcomes were early and midterm clinical outcomes including all-cause mortality and superior vena cava reintervention.

Results: Operative mortality was 1.7%. Cumulative incidence of all-cause mortality was not significantly difference between the groups. Graft occlusion was detected in 22 patients. Cumulative incidence of graft occlusion was 24.2%, 36.4%, 42.4%, 48.5%, and 60.6% at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years, respectively, in Bovine group, whereas no graft occlusion was observed in Polytetrafluoroethylene group(P=0.007). Although the incidence of graft occlusion was higher in Bovine group, cumulative incidence of reintervention was not significantly different between the groups(0.0% vs. 3.0% in Polytetrafluoroethylene vs. Bovine groups at 1 year, P=0.406). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that bovine pericardial conduit(Polytetrafluoroethylene graft as reference) and left brachiocephalic vein reconstruction(right brachiocephalic vein reconstruction as reference) were significant risk factors for graft occlusion.

Conclusions: In superior vena cava reconstruction, polytetrafluoroethylene grafts without rings were superior to bovine pericardial conduits in terms of midterm graft patency.

重建上腔静脉的假体选择:中期通畅率比较。
研究目的本研究比较了用于各种胸腔疾病上腔静脉重建的无环膨体聚四氟乙烯移植物与牛心包导管的中期通畅性:在我院2009年至2023年间接受上腔静脉切除和重建术的80例患者中,31例患者接受了无环聚四氟乙烯移植物(聚四氟乙烯组),28例患者接受了牛心包导管(牛心包组)。聚四氟乙烯组和牛组的中位随访时间分别为 19.5 个月和 64.6 个月。主要结果是中期移植物通畅率,次要结果是早期和中期临床结果,包括全因死亡率和上腔静脉再介入:结果:手术死亡率为1.7%。结果:手术死亡率为1.7%,组间全因死亡率无明显差异。22例患者发现移植物堵塞。牛皮组 1 个月、3 个月、6 个月、1 年和 2 年的移植物闭塞累积发生率分别为 24.2%、36.4%、42.4%、48.5% 和 60.6%,而聚四氟乙烯组未观察到移植物闭塞(P=0.007)。虽然牛组的移植物闭塞发生率较高,但两组间再次介入的累积发生率并无显著差异(1 年时,聚四氟乙烯组为 0.0%,牛组为 3.0%,P=0.406)。多变量分析表明,牛心包导管(以聚四氟乙烯移植物为参照)和左肱静脉重建(以右肱静脉重建为参照)是移植物闭塞的重要风险因素:在上腔静脉重建中,就中期移植物通畅性而言,无环聚四氟乙烯移植物优于牛心包导管。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信