Exploring patients' rights awareness and implementations amongst hospitalized patients in Northern Palestine: insights from a local perspective.

IF 3 1区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS
Anas Odeh, Nadeem Khayat, Saad Abuzahra, Amira Shaheen, Zaher Nazzal
{"title":"Exploring patients' rights awareness and implementations amongst hospitalized patients in Northern Palestine: insights from a local perspective.","authors":"Anas Odeh, Nadeem Khayat, Saad Abuzahra, Amira Shaheen, Zaher Nazzal","doi":"10.1186/s12910-024-01139-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>Promoting ethical medical practices and preserving human rights principles require an understanding of patient rights. Studies show varying awareness levels among patients regarding their rights. This study aims to assess the level of awareness among patients in Palestine about their rights and the compliance of healthcare professionals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted between November 2023 and January 2024 in the Northern West Bank cities. Data collection was conducted by three trained medical students utilizing an interviewer-administered questionnaire. The association between participant characteristics and awareness was assessed using the Chi-square test, followed by a multivariate regression analysis to control for confounding variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 400 patients surveyed, 47.0% had good awareness of their rights. Multivariate analysis showed that awareness was associated with patients in the age group of 18-30 years and 46-60 years, having private insurance, more prior hospitalizations, non-governmental settings, and prior charter awareness. Awareness was highest for respectful care and lowest for staff introductions. Non-governmental facilities performed better than governmental on explaining procedures, alternatives, and costs, though both settings scored highly on non-discrimination and consent.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings underscore global gaps in ensuring adequate patients' rights awareness and implementation, with over half exhibiting inadequate knowledge. Significant deficiencies exist in involving patients in decision-making, informing about procedures/costs, and providing accessible complaint mechanisms, particularly in governmental facilities. Comprehensive, culturally-appropriate initiatives involving multisectoral collaborations are crucial to drive substantive reforms translating patient-centered care principles into consistent practice worldwide.</p>","PeriodicalId":55348,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Ethics","volume":"25 1","pages":"139"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11590486/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-024-01139-4","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aim: Promoting ethical medical practices and preserving human rights principles require an understanding of patient rights. Studies show varying awareness levels among patients regarding their rights. This study aims to assess the level of awareness among patients in Palestine about their rights and the compliance of healthcare professionals.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted between November 2023 and January 2024 in the Northern West Bank cities. Data collection was conducted by three trained medical students utilizing an interviewer-administered questionnaire. The association between participant characteristics and awareness was assessed using the Chi-square test, followed by a multivariate regression analysis to control for confounding variables.

Results: Of 400 patients surveyed, 47.0% had good awareness of their rights. Multivariate analysis showed that awareness was associated with patients in the age group of 18-30 years and 46-60 years, having private insurance, more prior hospitalizations, non-governmental settings, and prior charter awareness. Awareness was highest for respectful care and lowest for staff introductions. Non-governmental facilities performed better than governmental on explaining procedures, alternatives, and costs, though both settings scored highly on non-discrimination and consent.

Conclusions: Our findings underscore global gaps in ensuring adequate patients' rights awareness and implementation, with over half exhibiting inadequate knowledge. Significant deficiencies exist in involving patients in decision-making, informing about procedures/costs, and providing accessible complaint mechanisms, particularly in governmental facilities. Comprehensive, culturally-appropriate initiatives involving multisectoral collaborations are crucial to drive substantive reforms translating patient-centered care principles into consistent practice worldwide.

探讨巴勒斯坦北部住院病人的权利意识和落实情况:从当地视角提出的见解。
背景和目的:促进合乎道德的医疗实践和维护人权原则需要了解病人的权利。研究表明,患者对自身权利的认识水平参差不齐。本研究旨在评估巴勒斯坦患者对自身权利的认识水平以及医护人员的遵从情况:这项横断面研究于 2023 年 11 月至 2024 年 1 月在约旦河西岸北部城市进行。数据收集工作由三名训练有素的医科学生进行,采用的是由访谈者发放的调查问卷。利用卡方检验评估了参与者特征与认知度之间的关系,随后进行了多变量回归分析以控制混杂变量:结果:在接受调查的 400 名患者中,47.0% 的人对自己的权利有良好的认识。多变量分析表明,患者的权利意识与以下因素有关:年龄在 18-30 岁和 46-60 岁之间、有私人保险、以前住院次数较多、非政府机构、以前有宪章意识。对尊重护理的认知度最高,对工作人员介绍的认知度最低。非政府机构在解释程序、替代方案和费用方面的表现优于政府机构,但在不歧视和同意方面,非政府机构和政府机构的得分都很高:我们的研究结果表明,全球在确保充分认识和落实患者权利方面存在差距,一半以上的机构对患者权利的认识不足。在让患者参与决策、告知程序/费用以及提供便捷的投诉机制方面存在重大缺陷,尤其是在政府机构。要推动实质性改革,将 "以患者为中心 "的护理原则转化为全球一致的实践,涉及多部门合作的全面、文化适宜的倡议至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Medical Ethics
BMC Medical Ethics MEDICAL ETHICS-
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
7.40%
发文量
108
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Ethics is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the ethical aspects of biomedical research and clinical practice, including professional choices and conduct, medical technologies, healthcare systems and health policies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信