Polygenic Risk Score Improves Melanoma Risk Assessment in a Patient Cohort from the Veneto Region of Italy.

IF 3.6 3区 生物学 Q1 BIOLOGY
Stefania Pellegrini, Thomas P Potjer, Paola Del Bianco, Antonella Vecchiato, Alessio Fabozzi, Luisa Piccin, Debora Tonello, Nienke van der Stoep, Emily Tinsley, Maria Teresa Landi, Mark M Iles, Chiara Menin
{"title":"Polygenic Risk Score Improves Melanoma Risk Assessment in a Patient Cohort from the Veneto Region of Italy.","authors":"Stefania Pellegrini, Thomas P Potjer, Paola Del Bianco, Antonella Vecchiato, Alessio Fabozzi, Luisa Piccin, Debora Tonello, Nienke van der Stoep, Emily Tinsley, Maria Teresa Landi, Mark M Iles, Chiara Menin","doi":"10.3390/biology13110954","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recent genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have identified many single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that alone weakly affect melanoma risk, but their combined effect on a polygenic risk score (PRS) can have a far bigger impact on estimating risk. However, the PRS is not yet at the stage of being utilized in clinical practice, and further evidence is needed. In this study, 270 melanoma patients fulfilling the criteria for a suspected genetic predisposition but with a negative genetic test for high/medium-penetrance genes were genotyped for 57 SNPs selected in previous GWASs to construct a PRS model. We found a significantly higher mean PRS<sub>57</sub> in all melanoma cases than in controls (0.58 vs. 0.00, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and the mean PRS<sub>57</sub> in multiple primary melanoma cases was twice that in single melanoma cases (0.689 vs. 0.362, <i>p</i> = 0.025). Interestingly, our results confirm the association of the PRS<sub>57</sub> not only with other melanoma risk factors but also with a younger age at diagnosis. This evidence supports the potentially powerful discriminative role of PRS in the selection of high-risk patients who should undergo stricter surveillance protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":48624,"journal":{"name":"Biology-Basel","volume":"13 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11592222/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biology-Basel","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13110954","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have identified many single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that alone weakly affect melanoma risk, but their combined effect on a polygenic risk score (PRS) can have a far bigger impact on estimating risk. However, the PRS is not yet at the stage of being utilized in clinical practice, and further evidence is needed. In this study, 270 melanoma patients fulfilling the criteria for a suspected genetic predisposition but with a negative genetic test for high/medium-penetrance genes were genotyped for 57 SNPs selected in previous GWASs to construct a PRS model. We found a significantly higher mean PRS57 in all melanoma cases than in controls (0.58 vs. 0.00, p < 0.001), and the mean PRS57 in multiple primary melanoma cases was twice that in single melanoma cases (0.689 vs. 0.362, p = 0.025). Interestingly, our results confirm the association of the PRS57 not only with other melanoma risk factors but also with a younger age at diagnosis. This evidence supports the potentially powerful discriminative role of PRS in the selection of high-risk patients who should undergo stricter surveillance protocols.

多基因风险评分改进了对意大利威尼托地区患者队列的黑色素瘤风险评估。
最近的全基因组关联研究(GWASs)发现了许多单核苷酸多态性(SNPs),这些单核苷酸多态性对黑色素瘤风险的影响很微弱,但它们对多基因风险评分(PRS)的综合影响对估计风险的影响要大得多。然而,多基因风险评分尚未应用于临床实践,还需要进一步的证据。在这项研究中,我们对符合疑似遗传易感性标准、但高/中遗传易感性基因检测呈阴性的 270 名黑色素瘤患者进行了基因分型,检测了以往全球基因组研究中筛选出的 57 个 SNPs,以构建 PRS 模型。我们发现,所有黑色素瘤病例的平均PRS57明显高于对照组(0.58 vs. 0.00,p < 0.001),多发性原发性黑色素瘤病例的平均PRS57是单发黑色素瘤病例的两倍(0.689 vs. 0.362,p = 0.025)。有趣的是,我们的研究结果证实,PRS57 不仅与其他黑色素瘤风险因素有关,还与较年轻的诊断年龄有关。这一证据支持了 PRS 在选择应接受更严格监测方案的高危患者方面潜在的强大鉴别作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biology-Basel
Biology-Basel Biological Science-Biological Science
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
1618
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Biology (ISSN 2079-7737) is an international, peer-reviewed, quick-refereeing open access journal of Biological Science published by MDPI online. It publishes reviews, research papers and communications in all areas of biology and at the interface of related disciplines. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Electronic files regarding the full details of the experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信