Efficacy and Safety of a Dedicated Device for Cerebral Venous Thrombectomy: A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial.

IF 7.8 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Yi Xu, Yan Wu, Miaowen Jiang, Baoying Song, Chuanhui Li, Chuanjie Wu, Jiangang Duan, Ran Meng, Chen Zhou, Sijie Li, Feng Yan, Jian Chen, Ming Li, Xunming Ji
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of a Dedicated Device for Cerebral Venous Thrombectomy: A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Yi Xu, Yan Wu, Miaowen Jiang, Baoying Song, Chuanhui Li, Chuanjie Wu, Jiangang Duan, Ran Meng, Chen Zhou, Sijie Li, Feng Yan, Jian Chen, Ming Li, Xunming Ji","doi":"10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.045607","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lack of a dedicated thrombectomy device for cerebral venous thrombosis hinders the recanalization ability of endovascular treatment (EVT). Novel NiTi-braided stent retriever (Venous-TD) is a dedicated venous sinus thrombectomy device. This study aims to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of Venous-TD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this pilot, prospective, randomized, single-blind, parallel-group control, single-center clinical study, patients with cerebral venous thrombosis from Beijing Xuanwu Hospital were included. Randomization was performed to EVT with either the Venous-TD or Angioguard with Sterling balloon (control group). The primary efficacy outcome was the proportion of immediate complete recanalization during EVT. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of functional independence and moderate to severe residential headache at 180 days after EVT. Safety outcomes included peri-procedural complications, all-cause mortality, and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage after EVT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 61 patients were enrolled and randomized. Thirty-one patients were randomized to the Venous-TD group, and 30 were randomized to the control group. The median (interquartile range) age was 28 (21-45) in the Venous-TD group and 34 (24-43) in the control group. The proportion of patients with a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score >8 on admission was 8 (25.8%) in the Venous-TD group and 11 (36.7%) in the control group. During EVT, Venous-TD significantly improved the proportion of complete recanalization compared with Angioguard (23 [76.7%] versus 6 [20.0%]; relative risk, 3.833 [95% CI, 1.825-8.054]). The proportions of long-term functional independence at 180 days in the Venous-TD group and the control group were not significantly different. The proportion of patients with severe residual headache at 180 days in the Venous-TD group was significantly lower than that in the control group (3 [9.7%] versus 10 [35.7%]; relative risk, 0.271 [95% CI, 0.083-0.886]). Safety outcomes showed no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This trial indicated that Venous-TD did not increase complications in EVT of cerebral venous thrombosis and can significantly increase the proportion of complete recanalization. A multicenter phase III randomized control trial assessing efficacy and safety of Venous-TD is warranted.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT05291585.</p>","PeriodicalId":21989,"journal":{"name":"Stroke","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stroke","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.045607","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Lack of a dedicated thrombectomy device for cerebral venous thrombosis hinders the recanalization ability of endovascular treatment (EVT). Novel NiTi-braided stent retriever (Venous-TD) is a dedicated venous sinus thrombectomy device. This study aims to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of Venous-TD.

Methods: In this pilot, prospective, randomized, single-blind, parallel-group control, single-center clinical study, patients with cerebral venous thrombosis from Beijing Xuanwu Hospital were included. Randomization was performed to EVT with either the Venous-TD or Angioguard with Sterling balloon (control group). The primary efficacy outcome was the proportion of immediate complete recanalization during EVT. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of functional independence and moderate to severe residential headache at 180 days after EVT. Safety outcomes included peri-procedural complications, all-cause mortality, and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage after EVT.

Results: A total of 61 patients were enrolled and randomized. Thirty-one patients were randomized to the Venous-TD group, and 30 were randomized to the control group. The median (interquartile range) age was 28 (21-45) in the Venous-TD group and 34 (24-43) in the control group. The proportion of patients with a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score >8 on admission was 8 (25.8%) in the Venous-TD group and 11 (36.7%) in the control group. During EVT, Venous-TD significantly improved the proportion of complete recanalization compared with Angioguard (23 [76.7%] versus 6 [20.0%]; relative risk, 3.833 [95% CI, 1.825-8.054]). The proportions of long-term functional independence at 180 days in the Venous-TD group and the control group were not significantly different. The proportion of patients with severe residual headache at 180 days in the Venous-TD group was significantly lower than that in the control group (3 [9.7%] versus 10 [35.7%]; relative risk, 0.271 [95% CI, 0.083-0.886]). Safety outcomes showed no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups.

Conclusions: This trial indicated that Venous-TD did not increase complications in EVT of cerebral venous thrombosis and can significantly increase the proportion of complete recanalization. A multicenter phase III randomized control trial assessing efficacy and safety of Venous-TD is warranted.

Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT05291585.

脑静脉血栓切除术专用设备的有效性和安全性:试验性随机临床试验。
背景:脑静脉血栓缺乏专用的血栓切除装置,阻碍了血管内治疗(EVT)的再通能力。新型镍钛编织支架回取器(Venous-TD)是一种专用的静脉窦血栓切除装置。本研究旨在证明 Venous-TD 的安全性和有效性:在这项试验性、前瞻性、随机、单盲、平行组对照、单中心临床研究中,纳入了北京宣武医院的脑静脉血栓患者。随机分为使用 Venous-TD EVT 或使用 Sterling 球囊的 Angioguard EVT(对照组)。主要疗效指标是EVT过程中立即完全再通畅的比例。次要结果包括EVT后180天的功能独立比例和中度至重度居民头痛比例。安全性结果包括EVT术后围手术期并发症、全因死亡率和无症状颅内出血:共有61名患者入选并被随机分组。结果:共有61名患者入选并接受了随机治疗,其中31名患者被随机分配到静脉-TD组,30名患者被随机分配到对照组。静脉-TD组的中位年龄(四分位间距)为28岁(21-45岁),对照组为34岁(24-43岁)。入院时美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表评分大于 8 分的患者比例为:静脉-TD 组 8 人(25.8%),对照组 11 人(36.7%)。在 EVT 期间,与 Angioguard 相比,Venous-TD 显著提高了完全再通畅的比例(23 [76.7%] 对 6 [20.0%];相对风险为 3.833 [95% CI,1.825-8.054])。静脉-TD 组和对照组在 180 天后长期功能独立的比例没有显著差异。静脉-头痛治疗组 180 天后出现严重残余头痛的患者比例明显低于对照组(3 [9.7%] 对 10 [35.7%];相对风险为 0.271 [95% CI, 0.083-0.886])。安全性结果显示,两组之间的差异无统计学意义:这项试验表明,Venous-TD 不会增加脑静脉血栓 EVT 的并发症,并能显著提高完全再通的比例。有必要进行多中心III期随机对照试验,评估Venous-TD的有效性和安全性:URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier:NCT05291585。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Stroke
Stroke 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
13.40
自引率
6.00%
发文量
2021
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Stroke is a monthly publication that collates reports of clinical and basic investigation of any aspect of the cerebral circulation and its diseases. The publication covers a wide range of disciplines including anesthesiology, critical care medicine, epidemiology, internal medicine, neurology, neuro-ophthalmology, neuropathology, neuropsychology, neurosurgery, nuclear medicine, nursing, radiology, rehabilitation, speech pathology, vascular physiology, and vascular surgery. The audience of Stroke includes neurologists, basic scientists, cardiologists, vascular surgeons, internists, interventionalists, neurosurgeons, nurses, and physiatrists. Stroke is indexed in Biological Abstracts, BIOSIS, CAB Abstracts, Chemical Abstracts, CINAHL, Current Contents, Embase, MEDLINE, and Science Citation Index Expanded.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信