Impact of single chamber and dual chamber permanent pacemaker implantation on left ventricular function: An observational study.

IF 1.9 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Merajul Haque, Monika Bhandari, Akshyaya Pradhan, Pravesh Vishwakarma, Abhishek Singh, Ayush Shukla, Akhil Sharma, Gaurav Chaudhary, Rishi Sethi, Sharad Chandra, Arvind Jaiswal, Sudhanshu Kumar Dwivedi
{"title":"Impact of single chamber and dual chamber permanent pacemaker implantation on left ventricular function: An observational study.","authors":"Merajul Haque, Monika Bhandari, Akshyaya Pradhan, Pravesh Vishwakarma, Abhishek Singh, Ayush Shukla, Akhil Sharma, Gaurav Chaudhary, Rishi Sethi, Sharad Chandra, Arvind Jaiswal, Sudhanshu Kumar Dwivedi","doi":"10.4330/wjc.v16.i11.644","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Permanent pacemaker implantation has the potential to impact left ventricular (LV) function and hence quality of life (QoL) in the long term.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess the effect of single- and dual-chamber pacing on LV function and QoL.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 56 patients who underwent permanent pacing: Dual pacing, dual sensing, dual responsive and rate responsive (DDDR) for the initial 3 months and ventricular pacing, ventricular sensing, inhibited response and rate responsive (VVIR) for the next 3 months, and DDDR mode for the last 3 months. Throughout the study period, various echocardiographic parameters, functional status, and QoL were measured to assess the impact of pacing on LV function compared with baseline and at every 3 months interval.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A significant change appeared in cardiac function after VVIR pacing which included diastolic properties of LV as shown by increase in isovolumic relaxation time from (85.28 ± 9.54 ms) to (89.53 ± 9.65 ms). At the 3-, 6-, and 9-month follow-up, reduction in LV ejection fraction was observed to be 62.71 ± 4.66%, 61.07 ± 4.41%, and 58.48 ± 3.89%, respectively. An increase in the QoL scores was noted at every follow-up visit.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>An apparent depressant effect on LV function due to right ventricular pacing, with a higher incidence of adverse outcomes in the VVIR mode. In addition, an upsurge in QoL scores for the study population was noted, which indicates improvement in the QoL of patients post-pacing, irrespective of the mode. Generally, the DDDR mode is a highly preferable pacing mode.</p>","PeriodicalId":23800,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Cardiology","volume":"16 11","pages":"644-650"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11586730/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v16.i11.644","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Permanent pacemaker implantation has the potential to impact left ventricular (LV) function and hence quality of life (QoL) in the long term.

Aim: To assess the effect of single- and dual-chamber pacing on LV function and QoL.

Methods: This study included 56 patients who underwent permanent pacing: Dual pacing, dual sensing, dual responsive and rate responsive (DDDR) for the initial 3 months and ventricular pacing, ventricular sensing, inhibited response and rate responsive (VVIR) for the next 3 months, and DDDR mode for the last 3 months. Throughout the study period, various echocardiographic parameters, functional status, and QoL were measured to assess the impact of pacing on LV function compared with baseline and at every 3 months interval.

Results: A significant change appeared in cardiac function after VVIR pacing which included diastolic properties of LV as shown by increase in isovolumic relaxation time from (85.28 ± 9.54 ms) to (89.53 ± 9.65 ms). At the 3-, 6-, and 9-month follow-up, reduction in LV ejection fraction was observed to be 62.71 ± 4.66%, 61.07 ± 4.41%, and 58.48 ± 3.89%, respectively. An increase in the QoL scores was noted at every follow-up visit.

Conclusion: An apparent depressant effect on LV function due to right ventricular pacing, with a higher incidence of adverse outcomes in the VVIR mode. In addition, an upsurge in QoL scores for the study population was noted, which indicates improvement in the QoL of patients post-pacing, irrespective of the mode. Generally, the DDDR mode is a highly preferable pacing mode.

单腔和双腔永久起搏器植入对左心室功能的影响:一项观察性研究。
背景:目的:评估单腔和双腔起搏对左心室功能和生活质量的影响:本研究纳入了 56 名接受永久起搏的患者:该研究纳入了 56 名接受永久起搏的患者:最初 3 个月采用双起搏、双传感、双响应和速率响应(DDDR)模式,随后 3 个月采用心室起搏、心室传感、抑制响应和速率响应(VVIR)模式,最后 3 个月采用 DDDR 模式。在整个研究期间,对各种超声心动图参数、功能状态和 QoL 进行了测量,以评估起搏对左心室功能的影响:VVIR起搏后心脏功能发生了明显变化,包括左心室舒张功能,等容舒张时间从(85.28 ± 9.54 ms)增加到(89.53 ± 9.65 ms)。在 3 个月、6 个月和 9 个月的随访中,观察到左心室射血分数分别降低为 62.71 ± 4.66%、61.07 ± 4.41% 和 58.48 ± 3.89%。每次随访时,QoL评分均有所提高:结论:右心室起搏对左心室功能有明显的抑制作用,VVIR模式下不良后果的发生率更高。结论:右心室起搏对左心室功能有明显的抑制作用,在 VVIR 模式下不良后果的发生率较高。此外,研究人群的 QoL 评分有所上升,这表明无论采用哪种模式,起搏后患者的 QoL 都有所改善。一般来说,DDDR 模式是一种非常可取的起搏模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
World Journal of Cardiology
World Journal of Cardiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
54
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信