Barriers and Facilitators to the Inclusion of Naturopaths in Interprofessional Health Care Teams: A Scoping Review.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Isabelle Taye, Sandra Grace, Joanne Bradbury
{"title":"Barriers and Facilitators to the Inclusion of Naturopaths in Interprofessional Health Care Teams: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Isabelle Taye, Sandra Grace, Joanne Bradbury","doi":"10.1089/jicm.2024.0569","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Objective:</i></b> The growing population of individuals with chronic pain presents a challenge to a globally overburdened health care workforce. Naturopaths are trained as primary health care providers who manage patients with chronic pain and, yet, are often overlooked in health care teams. This scoping review aims to identify barriers and facilitators affecting naturopathic inclusion into interprofessional health care teams managing patients with chronic pain. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This study protocol was registered <i>a priori</i> through Open Science (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/2G3JT). A search was conducted using databases AMED, CINAHL, MEDLINE, SCOPUS, Web of Science, APA PsycInfo, and Health Business Elite. Search limits included English language from 2012 to 2023. Included publications were from academic and gray literature. Search terms used included the following: \"Naturopath*\" OR \"Integrative medicine\" AND \"Health care system*\" OR \"Health system*\" OR \"Models of health care\" OR \"Professional autonomy\" OR \"Professional regulation\" OR \"Professional govern*\" OR \"Interprofessional practice (IPP)\" OR \"Multidisciplinary communication.\" The scoping review utilized Covidence software and was analyzed using thematic analysis. Themes were identified following Arksey and O'Malley's (2005) framework to inform a narrative approach. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Five themes emerged that relate to the inclusion of naturopaths in health care teams as follows: (1) perceptions of naturopathy, (2) practice standards, (3) legitimacy, (4) resources, and (5) shifting power dynamics and cooperation. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Barriers for naturopathic inclusion into health care teams are influenced by perceptions of naturopathy, naturopathic education standards, regulations, research, and patient equity and access. Facilitators for inclusion include the growing shift toward person-centered care, greater interprofessional education, and shared assets, including colocation.</p>","PeriodicalId":29734,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jicm.2024.0569","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The growing population of individuals with chronic pain presents a challenge to a globally overburdened health care workforce. Naturopaths are trained as primary health care providers who manage patients with chronic pain and, yet, are often overlooked in health care teams. This scoping review aims to identify barriers and facilitators affecting naturopathic inclusion into interprofessional health care teams managing patients with chronic pain. Methods: This study protocol was registered a priori through Open Science (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/2G3JT). A search was conducted using databases AMED, CINAHL, MEDLINE, SCOPUS, Web of Science, APA PsycInfo, and Health Business Elite. Search limits included English language from 2012 to 2023. Included publications were from academic and gray literature. Search terms used included the following: "Naturopath*" OR "Integrative medicine" AND "Health care system*" OR "Health system*" OR "Models of health care" OR "Professional autonomy" OR "Professional regulation" OR "Professional govern*" OR "Interprofessional practice (IPP)" OR "Multidisciplinary communication." The scoping review utilized Covidence software and was analyzed using thematic analysis. Themes were identified following Arksey and O'Malley's (2005) framework to inform a narrative approach. Results: Five themes emerged that relate to the inclusion of naturopaths in health care teams as follows: (1) perceptions of naturopathy, (2) practice standards, (3) legitimacy, (4) resources, and (5) shifting power dynamics and cooperation. Conclusions: Barriers for naturopathic inclusion into health care teams are influenced by perceptions of naturopathy, naturopathic education standards, regulations, research, and patient equity and access. Facilitators for inclusion include the growing shift toward person-centered care, greater interprofessional education, and shared assets, including colocation.

将自然疗法师纳入跨专业医疗团队的障碍和促进因素:范围界定综述》。
目的:越来越多的人患有慢性疼痛,这给全球负担过重的医疗队伍带来了挑战。自然疗法师被培训为初级医疗保健提供者,负责管理慢性疼痛患者,但在医疗保健团队中却经常被忽视。本范围界定综述旨在找出影响自然疗法融入跨专业医护团队、管理慢性疼痛患者的障碍和促进因素。研究方法本研究方案事先已通过开放科学(https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/2G3JT)进行了注册。使用 AMED、CINAHL、MEDLINE、SCOPUS、Web of Science、APA PsycInfo 和 Health Business Elite 等数据库进行了检索。搜索范围包括 2012 年至 2023 年的英文文献。纳入的出版物来自学术和灰色文献。使用的搜索关键词包括"自然疗法或 "整合医学 "和 "医疗保健系统*"或 "卫生系统*"或 "医疗保健模式 "或 "专业自治 "或 "专业监管 "或 "专业管理*"或 "跨专业实践(IPP)"或 "多学科交流"。范围界定审查使用 Covidence 软件,并采用专题分析法进行分析。根据 Arksey 和 O'Malley(2005 年)的框架确定了主题,为叙事方法提供了依据。结果:与将自然疗法师纳入医疗团队有关的五个主题如下:(1) 对自然疗法的看法,(2) 实践标准,(3) 合法性,(4) 资源,以及 (5) 权力动态变化与合作。结论:将自然疗法纳入医疗团队的障碍受到对自然疗法的看法、自然疗法教育标准、法规、研究以及患者公平性和可及性的影响。促进自然疗法融入医疗保健团队的因素包括:日益转向以人为本的医疗保健、更多的跨专业教育以及共享资产(包括同地办公)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信