Provider Perceptions of Outcomes in the Pediatric Cardiac Intensive Care Unit.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Preston J Boyer, Kurt R Schumacher, Kate Thornsberry, Sunkyung Yu, Ray Lowery, Nathaniel R Sznycer-Taub
{"title":"Provider Perceptions of Outcomes in the Pediatric Cardiac Intensive Care Unit.","authors":"Preston J Boyer, Kurt R Schumacher, Kate Thornsberry, Sunkyung Yu, Ray Lowery, Nathaniel R Sznycer-Taub","doi":"10.1007/s00246-024-03717-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the pediatric cardiac intensive care unit (PCICU), predicting the complications and long-term impact of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is influenced by the providers' perceptions. Little is understood about such perceptions as they relate to provider role and experience. A multi-disciplinary group in the PCICU of a single center was surveyed regarding two patient scenarios: (1) ECMO after cardiac surgery, and (2) cardiac arrest with need for CPR. Respondents indicated their risk tolerance for potential complications of these interventions, and the impact on patient health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Responses were compared based on providers' role and experience. 101 providers were surveyed and were willing to tolerate a 50% risk of death with ECMO or continued CPR but had less tolerance for the risk of other long-term morbidities. For most potential complications, nurses had the lowest risk tolerance and attending physicians the highest. Provider experience had no impact on risk tolerance. All providers underestimated HRQoL scores compared to previously published scores of patients who survived the surveyed scenarios. This survey is one of the first to explore providers' perceptions of ECMO and CPR. PCICU providers are more willing to accept the risk of death than other morbid complications, and poorly predict HRQoL outcomes. Team members have varied risk tolerance for complications and predict their impact differently. Understanding the variability of and influences on perceptions of patient outcomes could help improve communication with patients and families, team dynamics, and decision-making in the PCICU.</p>","PeriodicalId":19814,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-024-03717-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the pediatric cardiac intensive care unit (PCICU), predicting the complications and long-term impact of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is influenced by the providers' perceptions. Little is understood about such perceptions as they relate to provider role and experience. A multi-disciplinary group in the PCICU of a single center was surveyed regarding two patient scenarios: (1) ECMO after cardiac surgery, and (2) cardiac arrest with need for CPR. Respondents indicated their risk tolerance for potential complications of these interventions, and the impact on patient health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Responses were compared based on providers' role and experience. 101 providers were surveyed and were willing to tolerate a 50% risk of death with ECMO or continued CPR but had less tolerance for the risk of other long-term morbidities. For most potential complications, nurses had the lowest risk tolerance and attending physicians the highest. Provider experience had no impact on risk tolerance. All providers underestimated HRQoL scores compared to previously published scores of patients who survived the surveyed scenarios. This survey is one of the first to explore providers' perceptions of ECMO and CPR. PCICU providers are more willing to accept the risk of death than other morbid complications, and poorly predict HRQoL outcomes. Team members have varied risk tolerance for complications and predict their impact differently. Understanding the variability of and influences on perceptions of patient outcomes could help improve communication with patients and families, team dynamics, and decision-making in the PCICU.

医护人员对儿科心脏重症监护室治疗效果的看法。
在儿科心脏重症监护病房(PCICU)中,预测体外膜肺氧合(ECMO)和心肺复苏(CPR)的并发症和长期影响受到提供者观念的影响。人们对这些观念与提供者角色和经验的关系知之甚少。我们对一个中心 PCICU 的多学科小组就两种患者情况进行了调查:(1) 心脏手术后的 ECMO;(2) 需要心肺复苏的心脏骤停。受访者表示了他们对这些干预措施潜在并发症的风险承受能力,以及对患者健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)的影响。根据医疗服务提供者的角色和经验对受访者的回答进行了比较。101 名医疗服务提供者接受了调查,他们愿意承受 ECMO 或持续心肺复苏带来的 50% 死亡风险,但对其他长期发病风险的承受能力较低。对于大多数潜在并发症,护士的风险承受能力最低,而主治医生的风险承受能力最高。医疗服务提供者的经验对风险承受能力没有影响。与之前公布的在调查情景中存活下来的患者的评分相比,所有医疗服务提供者都低估了患者的 HRQoL 评分。这项调查是首次探讨医护人员对 ECMO 和心肺复苏的看法。与其他发病并发症相比,PCICU 医护人员更愿意接受死亡风险,但对 HRQoL 结果的预测却很低。团队成员对并发症的风险承受能力各不相同,对并发症影响的预测也不尽相同。了解对患者预后看法的差异性和影响因素有助于改善与患者和家属的沟通、团队活力以及 PCICU 的决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatric Cardiology
Pediatric Cardiology 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
258
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: The editor of Pediatric Cardiology welcomes original manuscripts concerning all aspects of heart disease in infants, children, and adolescents, including embryology and anatomy, physiology and pharmacology, biochemistry, pathology, genetics, radiology, clinical aspects, investigative cardiology, electrophysiology and echocardiography, and cardiac surgery. Articles which may include original articles, review articles, letters to the editor etc., must be written in English and must be submitted solely to Pediatric Cardiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信