Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification (LAMP): An Innovative Approach for the Environmental Monitoring of SARS-CoV-2.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY
Simona Spiteri, Federica Marino, Luna Girolamini, Maria Rosaria Pascale, Carlo Derelitto, Laura Caligaris, Simone Paghera, Sandra Cristino
{"title":"Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification (LAMP): An Innovative Approach for the Environmental Monitoring of SARS-CoV-2.","authors":"Simona Spiteri, Federica Marino, Luna Girolamini, Maria Rosaria Pascale, Carlo Derelitto, Laura Caligaris, Simone Paghera, Sandra Cristino","doi":"10.3390/pathogens13111022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The rapid and accurate detection of SARS-CoV-2 in environmental settings is crucial for effective public health management during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study compares the performance of the Reverse Transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) and the Reverse Transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP) for SARS-CoV-2 detection from 100 surface samples collected in healthcare environments. The reference method, RT-qPCR, identified a percentage of 25% of positive samples, while RT-LAMP detected a percentage of 27% of positive surfaces. Our findings reveal a sensitivity of 32% and specificity of 75% for RT-LAMP, with a positive predictive value of 30% and a negative predictive value of 77%. The overall accuracy and concordance with RT-qPCR was 64% for both methods. Despite its lower sensitivity compared to RT-qPCR, RT-LAMP had an advantage due to its rapid screening and environmental surveillance, which is particularly useful for confirming negative results. These results underscore the potential of RT-LAMP not only as a valuable method in the environmental monitoring of SARS-CoV-2 but also as a system to control the sanitation process in ordinary and emergency conditions, providing further optimization and validation for its reliability in routine surveillance and outbreak response efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":19758,"journal":{"name":"Pathogens","volume":"13 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11597229/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pathogens","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens13111022","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The rapid and accurate detection of SARS-CoV-2 in environmental settings is crucial for effective public health management during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study compares the performance of the Reverse Transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) and the Reverse Transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP) for SARS-CoV-2 detection from 100 surface samples collected in healthcare environments. The reference method, RT-qPCR, identified a percentage of 25% of positive samples, while RT-LAMP detected a percentage of 27% of positive surfaces. Our findings reveal a sensitivity of 32% and specificity of 75% for RT-LAMP, with a positive predictive value of 30% and a negative predictive value of 77%. The overall accuracy and concordance with RT-qPCR was 64% for both methods. Despite its lower sensitivity compared to RT-qPCR, RT-LAMP had an advantage due to its rapid screening and environmental surveillance, which is particularly useful for confirming negative results. These results underscore the potential of RT-LAMP not only as a valuable method in the environmental monitoring of SARS-CoV-2 but also as a system to control the sanitation process in ordinary and emergency conditions, providing further optimization and validation for its reliability in routine surveillance and outbreak response efforts.

环路介导等温扩增(LAMP):环境监测 SARS-CoV-2 的创新方法。
在环境中快速准确地检测出 SARS-CoV-2 对于在 COVID-19 大流行期间进行有效的公共卫生管理至关重要。本研究比较了反转录定量聚合酶链反应(RT-qPCR)和反转录环介导等温扩增(RT-LAMP)从 100 份医疗环境采集的表面样本中检测 SARS-CoV-2 的性能。参考方法 RT-qPCR 检测出 25% 的阳性样本,而 RT-LAMP 检测出 27% 的阳性表面样本。我们的研究结果表明,RT-LAMP 的灵敏度为 32%,特异度为 75%,阳性预测值为 30%,阴性预测值为 77%。两种方法的总体准确率和与 RT-qPCR 的一致性均为 64%。尽管与 RT-qPCR 相比,RT-LAMP 的灵敏度较低,但由于其快速筛查和环境监测的优势,RT-LAMP 对确认阴性结果特别有用。这些结果凸显了 RT-LAMP 的潜力,它不仅是一种对 SARS-CoV-2 进行环境监测的重要方法,也是一种在普通和紧急状况下控制卫生过程的系统,为其在常规监测和疫情应对工作中的可靠性提供了进一步的优化和验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pathogens
Pathogens Medicine-Immunology and Allergy
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
8.10%
发文量
1285
审稿时长
17.75 days
期刊介绍: Pathogens (ISSN 2076-0817) publishes reviews, regular research papers and short notes on all aspects of pathogens and pathogen-host interactions. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical research in as much detail as possible. Full experimental and/or methodical details must be provided for research articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信