Risk factors for secondary vertebral compression fracture after percutaneous vertebral augmentation: a single-centre retrospective study.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Jin Tang, Siyu Wang, Jianing Wang, Xiaokun Wang, Tao Li, Lulu Cheng, Jinfeng Hu, Wei Xie
{"title":"Risk factors for secondary vertebral compression fracture after percutaneous vertebral augmentation: a single-centre retrospective study.","authors":"Jin Tang, Siyu Wang, Jianing Wang, Xiaokun Wang, Tao Li, Lulu Cheng, Jinfeng Hu, Wei Xie","doi":"10.1186/s13018-024-05290-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the incidence of secondary vertebral compression fracture (SVCF) after percutaneous vertebral augmentation (PVA) and its correlative risk factors, and to provide theoretical evidence for clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of 288 cases of PVA completed in our hospital from June 2020 to June 2023 was performed, and the patients were divided into the non-secondary vertebral compression fracture group (N-SVCF group) and the secondary vertebral compression fracture group (SVCF group) according to whether SVCF occurred during the postoperative follow-up review. Gender, age, body mass index (BMI), T value of bone mineral density (BMD-T), underlying diseases (hypertension, diabetes mellitus, coronary heart disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), intravertebral vacuum cleft (IVC), amount of bone cement injected, classification of cement diffusion, anterior vertebral recovery ratio, local Cobb angle correction rate, leakage of bone cement into the intervertebral space, and fat infiltration rate (FIR) of paraspinal muscles were collected from the patients. The incidence and risk factors of SVCF after PVA were evaluated using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis, and the predictive value of the independent risk factors was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) to determine the cut-off points at which they were meaningful for the development of SVCF.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In our study, the incidence of SVCF was 14.60% (42/288) in 288 patients who underwent PVA. Univariate analysis showed that age, BMI, fat infiltration rate of paraspinal muscles, cement leakage into the intervertebral space, unilateral/bilateral pedicle puncture approach and presence of IVC were statistically different between N-SVCF and SVCF (P < 0.05). Multifactorial regression analysis and ROC regression analysis revealed that the fat infiltration rate of the psoas major and erector spinae muscles, cement leakage into the intervertebral space, and IVC (P < 0.05) were risk factors for the incident of SVCF after PVA (P < 0.05). Psoas major (FIR) more than 5.490% and erector spinae (FIR) more than 52.413% had a high possibility of the occurrence of SVCF after PVA.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this study, logistic regression combined with ROC curve analysis indicated that FIR of psoas major and erector spinae, cement leakage in the intervertebral space, and IVC were risk factors for the occurrence of SVCF after PVA. Psoas major (FIR) more than 5.490% and erector spinae (FIR) more than 52.413% had a high possibility of the occurrence of SVCF after PVA.</p>","PeriodicalId":16629,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","volume":"19 1","pages":"797"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11600641/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-024-05290-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To determine the incidence of secondary vertebral compression fracture (SVCF) after percutaneous vertebral augmentation (PVA) and its correlative risk factors, and to provide theoretical evidence for clinical practice.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of 288 cases of PVA completed in our hospital from June 2020 to June 2023 was performed, and the patients were divided into the non-secondary vertebral compression fracture group (N-SVCF group) and the secondary vertebral compression fracture group (SVCF group) according to whether SVCF occurred during the postoperative follow-up review. Gender, age, body mass index (BMI), T value of bone mineral density (BMD-T), underlying diseases (hypertension, diabetes mellitus, coronary heart disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), intravertebral vacuum cleft (IVC), amount of bone cement injected, classification of cement diffusion, anterior vertebral recovery ratio, local Cobb angle correction rate, leakage of bone cement into the intervertebral space, and fat infiltration rate (FIR) of paraspinal muscles were collected from the patients. The incidence and risk factors of SVCF after PVA were evaluated using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis, and the predictive value of the independent risk factors was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) to determine the cut-off points at which they were meaningful for the development of SVCF.

Results: In our study, the incidence of SVCF was 14.60% (42/288) in 288 patients who underwent PVA. Univariate analysis showed that age, BMI, fat infiltration rate of paraspinal muscles, cement leakage into the intervertebral space, unilateral/bilateral pedicle puncture approach and presence of IVC were statistically different between N-SVCF and SVCF (P < 0.05). Multifactorial regression analysis and ROC regression analysis revealed that the fat infiltration rate of the psoas major and erector spinae muscles, cement leakage into the intervertebral space, and IVC (P < 0.05) were risk factors for the incident of SVCF after PVA (P < 0.05). Psoas major (FIR) more than 5.490% and erector spinae (FIR) more than 52.413% had a high possibility of the occurrence of SVCF after PVA.

Conclusion: In this study, logistic regression combined with ROC curve analysis indicated that FIR of psoas major and erector spinae, cement leakage in the intervertebral space, and IVC were risk factors for the occurrence of SVCF after PVA. Psoas major (FIR) more than 5.490% and erector spinae (FIR) more than 52.413% had a high possibility of the occurrence of SVCF after PVA.

经皮椎体增强术后继发性椎体压缩性骨折的风险因素:一项单中心回顾性研究。
目的确定经皮椎体增强术(PVA)后继发性椎体压缩骨折(SVCF)的发生率及其相关危险因素,为临床实践提供理论依据:对我院2020年6月至2023年6月完成的288例PVA患者进行回顾性分析,根据术后随访是否发生SVCF分为非继发性椎体压缩骨折组(N-SVCF组)和继发性椎体压缩骨折组(SVCF组)。收集患者的性别、年龄、体重指数(BMI)、骨矿密度 T 值(BMD-T)、基础疾病(高血压、糖尿病、冠心病、慢性阻塞性肺病)、椎体内真空裂隙(IVC)、骨水泥注射量、骨水泥扩散分类、椎体前方恢复比、局部 Cobb 角矫正率、骨水泥渗漏至椎间隙以及脊柱旁肌肉脂肪浸润率(FIR)。使用单变量和多变量逻辑回归分析评估了PVA术后SVCF的发生率和风险因素,并使用接收器操作特征曲线(ROC)评估了独立风险因素的预测价值,以确定这些因素对SVCF发生有意义的临界点:在我们的研究中,288 名接受 PVA 的患者中,SVCF 的发生率为 14.60%(42/288)。单变量分析表明,年龄、体重指数、脊柱旁肌肉脂肪浸润率、骨水泥渗漏到椎间隙、单侧/双侧椎弓根穿刺方法和是否存在 IVC 在 N-SVCF 和 SVCF 之间存在统计学差异(P 结论:SVCF 的发生率与椎间隙骨水泥渗漏有关:本研究的逻辑回归结合 ROC 曲线分析表明,腰大肌和竖脊肌的 FIR、椎间隙中的骨水泥渗漏和 IVC 是 PVA 后发生 SVCF 的危险因素。腰大肌(FIR)超过5.490%和竖脊肌(FIR)超过52.413%的患者极有可能在PVA术后发生SVCF。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
494
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research is an open access journal that encompasses all aspects of clinical and basic research studies related to musculoskeletal issues. Orthopaedic research is conducted at clinical and basic science levels. With the advancement of new technologies and the increasing expectation and demand from doctors and patients, we are witnessing an enormous growth in clinical orthopaedic research, particularly in the fields of traumatology, spinal surgery, joint replacement, sports medicine, musculoskeletal tumour management, hand microsurgery, foot and ankle surgery, paediatric orthopaedic, and orthopaedic rehabilitation. The involvement of basic science ranges from molecular, cellular, structural and functional perspectives to tissue engineering, gait analysis, automation and robotic surgery. Implant and biomaterial designs are new disciplines that complement clinical applications. JOSR encourages the publication of multidisciplinary research with collaboration amongst clinicians and scientists from different disciplines, which will be the trend in the coming decades.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信