Evaluation of ultra-low-dose CT with tin filter for craniosynostosis.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Wilson Tao, Robert Goetti
{"title":"Evaluation of ultra-low-dose CT with tin filter for craniosynostosis.","authors":"Wilson Tao, Robert Goetti","doi":"10.1111/1754-9485.13812","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>CT has replaced skull radiography as the gold standard for assessment of craniosynostosis in children. To minimise the risks of ionising radiation in this radiosensitive population, low-dose CT protocols are increasingly being adopted. This study evaluates the effectiveness of an ultra-low-dose CT protocol with a tin filter in reducing radiation exposure whilst maintaining diagnostic quality for craniosynostosis, and its utility in the evaluation of other findings not appreciable on skull radiography.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-seven patients who underwent ultra-low-dose CT for craniosynostosis were compared with an age-matched control group who received standard-dose CT for indications other than craniosynostosis. Differences in radiation dosimetry and quantitative image quality parameters were analysed using independent two-tailed t-tests. Radiologist reports were also examined for the frequency of other incidental radiological findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean effective dose for the 27 ultra-low-dose CT scans was 0.14 mSv, a 92% reduction compared with the control group. Image quality, measured by contrast-to-noise ratio, was significantly lower in the ultra-low-dose scans compared with the standard-dose scans; however, all scans were diagnostic for detecting or excluding craniosynostosis. Hydrocephalus was able to be ruled out in all 27 ultra-low-dose scans.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ultra-low-dose CT with a tin filter allows for the diagnosis of craniosynostosis with a 92% dose reduction compared with the standard CT protocol. Despite lower image quality with the ultra-low-dose protocol when compared to standard CT, all 27 scans were adequate for craniosynostosis diagnosis. Additionally, it allowed for the assessment of other relevant findings not appreciable with skull radiography, highlighting its advantages as the new clinical standard for craniosynostosis assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":16218,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1754-9485.13812","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: CT has replaced skull radiography as the gold standard for assessment of craniosynostosis in children. To minimise the risks of ionising radiation in this radiosensitive population, low-dose CT protocols are increasingly being adopted. This study evaluates the effectiveness of an ultra-low-dose CT protocol with a tin filter in reducing radiation exposure whilst maintaining diagnostic quality for craniosynostosis, and its utility in the evaluation of other findings not appreciable on skull radiography.

Methods: Twenty-seven patients who underwent ultra-low-dose CT for craniosynostosis were compared with an age-matched control group who received standard-dose CT for indications other than craniosynostosis. Differences in radiation dosimetry and quantitative image quality parameters were analysed using independent two-tailed t-tests. Radiologist reports were also examined for the frequency of other incidental radiological findings.

Results: Mean effective dose for the 27 ultra-low-dose CT scans was 0.14 mSv, a 92% reduction compared with the control group. Image quality, measured by contrast-to-noise ratio, was significantly lower in the ultra-low-dose scans compared with the standard-dose scans; however, all scans were diagnostic for detecting or excluding craniosynostosis. Hydrocephalus was able to be ruled out in all 27 ultra-low-dose scans.

Conclusion: Ultra-low-dose CT with a tin filter allows for the diagnosis of craniosynostosis with a 92% dose reduction compared with the standard CT protocol. Despite lower image quality with the ultra-low-dose protocol when compared to standard CT, all 27 scans were adequate for craniosynostosis diagnosis. Additionally, it allowed for the assessment of other relevant findings not appreciable with skull radiography, highlighting its advantages as the new clinical standard for craniosynostosis assessment.

使用锡滤波器的超低剂量 CT 对颅骨发育不良的评估。
简介:CT 已取代颅骨放射摄影,成为评估儿童颅骨发育不良的金标准。为了最大限度地降低这一辐射敏感人群的电离辐射风险,越来越多的人开始采用低剂量 CT 方案。本研究评估了使用锡滤波器的超低剂量 CT 方案在减少辐射照射、同时保持颅骨发育不良诊断质量方面的有效性,以及该方案在评估头颅 X 射线照相术中无法观察到的其他结果方面的实用性:方法:27 名因颅骨发育不良而接受超低剂量 CT 检查的患者与年龄匹配的对照组进行了比较,后者因颅骨发育不良以外的其他适应症而接受标准剂量 CT 检查。辐射剂量学和定量图像质量参数的差异采用独立的双尾 t 检验进行分析。此外,还对放射科医生的报告进行了检查,以了解其他偶然放射发现的频率:27 次超低剂量 CT 扫描的平均有效剂量为 0.14 mSv,与对照组相比降低了 92%。与标准剂量扫描相比,超低剂量扫描的图像质量(以对比度与噪声比衡量)明显较低;但是,所有扫描对检测或排除颅脑发育不良均有诊断意义。所有 27 次超低剂量扫描均能排除脑积水:结论:与标准 CT 方案相比,使用锡滤波器的超低剂量 CT 可以减少 92% 的剂量,从而诊断颅脑发育不良。尽管与标准 CT 相比,超低剂量方案的图像质量较低,但所有 27 次扫描都足以诊断颅骨发育不良。此外,它还能评估头颅放射摄影无法发现的其他相关结果,凸显了其作为颅骨发育不良评估新临床标准的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
133
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology (formerly Australasian Radiology) is the official journal of The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists, publishing articles of scientific excellence in radiology and radiation oncology. Manuscripts are judged on the basis of their contribution of original data and ideas or interpretation. All articles are peer reviewed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信