The Effects of COVID-19 on Antifungal Prescribing in the UK-Lessons to Learn.

IF 4.2 2区 生物学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY
Katharine Pates, Zhendan Shang, Rebeka Jabbar, Darius Armstrong-James, Silke Schelenz, Jimstan Periselneris, Rossella Arcucci, Anand Shah
{"title":"The Effects of COVID-19 on Antifungal Prescribing in the UK-Lessons to Learn.","authors":"Katharine Pates, Zhendan Shang, Rebeka Jabbar, Darius Armstrong-James, Silke Schelenz, Jimstan Periselneris, Rossella Arcucci, Anand Shah","doi":"10.3390/jof10110787","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Fungal infections are increasingly prevalent; however, antifungal stewardship attracts little funding or attention. Previous studies have shown that knowledge of guidelines and scientific evidence regarding antifungals is poor, leading to prescribing based on personal experiences and the inherent biases this entails. We carried out a retrospective study of inpatient antifungal usage at two major hospitals. We assessed the longitudinal trends in antifungal usage and the effect of COVID-19 on antifungal prescription, alongside levels of empirical and diagnostically targeted antifungal usage. Our results showed that the longitudinal patterns of total systemic antifungal usage within the trusts were similar to national prescribing trends; however, the composition of antifungals varied considerably, even when looking exclusively at the more homogenous group of COVID-19 patients. We showed a high level of empirical antifungal use in COVID-19 patients, with neither trust adhering to international recommendations and instead appearing to follow prior prescribing habits. This study highlights the significant challenges to optimise antifungal use with prescribing behaviour largely dictated by habit, a lack of adherence to guidelines, and high rates of empirical non-diagnostic-based prescribing. Further research and resources are required to understand the impact of antifungal stewardship on improving antifungal prescribing behaviours in this setting and the effects on outcome.</p>","PeriodicalId":15878,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Fungi","volume":"10 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11595319/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Fungi","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jof10110787","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fungal infections are increasingly prevalent; however, antifungal stewardship attracts little funding or attention. Previous studies have shown that knowledge of guidelines and scientific evidence regarding antifungals is poor, leading to prescribing based on personal experiences and the inherent biases this entails. We carried out a retrospective study of inpatient antifungal usage at two major hospitals. We assessed the longitudinal trends in antifungal usage and the effect of COVID-19 on antifungal prescription, alongside levels of empirical and diagnostically targeted antifungal usage. Our results showed that the longitudinal patterns of total systemic antifungal usage within the trusts were similar to national prescribing trends; however, the composition of antifungals varied considerably, even when looking exclusively at the more homogenous group of COVID-19 patients. We showed a high level of empirical antifungal use in COVID-19 patients, with neither trust adhering to international recommendations and instead appearing to follow prior prescribing habits. This study highlights the significant challenges to optimise antifungal use with prescribing behaviour largely dictated by habit, a lack of adherence to guidelines, and high rates of empirical non-diagnostic-based prescribing. Further research and resources are required to understand the impact of antifungal stewardship on improving antifungal prescribing behaviours in this setting and the effects on outcome.

COVID-19 对英国抗真菌药物处方的影响--值得借鉴的经验。
真菌感染的发病率越来越高,但抗真菌治疗却很少受到资助或关注。以往的研究表明,人们对有关抗真菌药物的指南和科学证据知之甚少,从而导致根据个人经验开具处方,并由此产生固有的偏见。我们对两家大型医院住院病人的抗真菌药物使用情况进行了回顾性研究。我们评估了抗真菌药物使用的纵向趋势、COVID-19 对抗真菌药物处方的影响以及经验性和诊断性抗真菌药物的使用水平。我们的研究结果表明,托管医院内全身抗真菌药物总用量的纵向模式与全国处方趋势相似;然而,即使只观察 COVID-19 患者这一较为单一的群体,抗真菌药物的构成也存在很大差异。我们发现,COVID-19 患者中使用经验性抗真菌药物的比例很高,两家医院都没有遵守国际建议,而是似乎沿用了以前的处方习惯。这项研究凸显了优化抗真菌药物使用所面临的巨大挑战,即处方行为主要由习惯决定、缺乏对指南的遵守以及非诊断性经验处方的高使用率。要了解抗真菌管理对改善抗真菌处方行为的影响以及对结果的影响,还需要进一步的研究和资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Fungi
Journal of Fungi Medicine-Microbiology (medical)
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
14.90%
发文量
1151
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Fungi (ISSN 2309-608X) is an international, peer-reviewed scientific open access journal that provides an advanced forum for studies related to pathogenic fungi, fungal biology, and all other aspects of fungal research. The journal publishes reviews, regular research papers, and communications in quarterly issues. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. Therefore, there is no restriction on paper length. Full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信