Investigation of the effects of a new transdermal formulation of systemic diclofenac on the upper gastrointestinal mucosa in patients with low back pain: A comparative study with oral diclofenac.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Hiroyuki Fukase, Seiji Futagami, Takatsugu Yamamoto, Tatsuhiro Masaoka, Takaaki Terahara, Koji Okawa, Yusuke Tanaka, Tsuyoshi Mita
{"title":"Investigation of the effects of a new transdermal formulation of systemic diclofenac on the upper gastrointestinal mucosa in patients with low back pain: A comparative study with oral diclofenac.","authors":"Hiroyuki Fukase, Seiji Futagami, Takatsugu Yamamoto, Tatsuhiro Masaoka, Takaaki Terahara, Koji Okawa, Yusuke Tanaka, Tsuyoshi Mita","doi":"10.1111/jgh.16810","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are associated with gastrointestinal mucosal damage attributed to a topical effect of NSAIDs on the gastrointestinal mucosa after oral administration and cyclooxygenase-1 inhibition. Diclofenac sodium systemic patch (DSSP), a transdermal patch from which diclofenac sodium is absorbed through the skin to exert its effects through the circulating blood, is considered to reduce the occurrence of gastrointestinal mucosal damage compared with oral diclofenac. This study aimed to compare the effect of DSSP on the upper gastrointestinal mucosa with that of an orally administered diclofenac sodium tablet (DST).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomized, evaluator-blinded study included Japanese patients with low back pain (LBP). The patients were administered with either DSSP (150 mg/day) or DST (75 mg/day) for 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was the incidence of gastroduodenal ulcers and/or erosions on upper gastrointestinal endoscopy after the study treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty patients each were randomly assigned to the DSSP and DST groups. The incidence of gastroduodenal ulcers and/or erosions was 26.7% and 86.2% in the DSSP and DST groups, respectively. The difference in the incidence was -59.5% (95% confidence interval: -77.0 to -34.6). No adverse events (AEs) were observed in the DSSP group, and 20.0% (6/30 patients) reported mild AEs in the DST group (excluding ulcers and erosions).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DSSP is associated with a lower risk of gastrointestinal mucosal damage than DST, which has the same active ingredient but uses a different route of administration, in patients with LBP.</p>","PeriodicalId":15877,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.16810","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aim: Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are associated with gastrointestinal mucosal damage attributed to a topical effect of NSAIDs on the gastrointestinal mucosa after oral administration and cyclooxygenase-1 inhibition. Diclofenac sodium systemic patch (DSSP), a transdermal patch from which diclofenac sodium is absorbed through the skin to exert its effects through the circulating blood, is considered to reduce the occurrence of gastrointestinal mucosal damage compared with oral diclofenac. This study aimed to compare the effect of DSSP on the upper gastrointestinal mucosa with that of an orally administered diclofenac sodium tablet (DST).

Methods: This randomized, evaluator-blinded study included Japanese patients with low back pain (LBP). The patients were administered with either DSSP (150 mg/day) or DST (75 mg/day) for 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was the incidence of gastroduodenal ulcers and/or erosions on upper gastrointestinal endoscopy after the study treatment.

Results: Thirty patients each were randomly assigned to the DSSP and DST groups. The incidence of gastroduodenal ulcers and/or erosions was 26.7% and 86.2% in the DSSP and DST groups, respectively. The difference in the incidence was -59.5% (95% confidence interval: -77.0 to -34.6). No adverse events (AEs) were observed in the DSSP group, and 20.0% (6/30 patients) reported mild AEs in the DST group (excluding ulcers and erosions).

Conclusion: DSSP is associated with a lower risk of gastrointestinal mucosal damage than DST, which has the same active ingredient but uses a different route of administration, in patients with LBP.

腰痛患者上消化道黏膜对全身性双氯芬酸新型透皮制剂影响的调查:与口服双氯芬酸的比较研究。
背景和目的:非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)与胃肠道粘膜损伤有关,这归因于非甾体抗炎药口服后对胃肠道粘膜的局部作用以及环氧化酶-1抑制作用。双氯芬酸钠全身贴剂(DSSP)是一种透皮贴剂,双氯芬酸钠可通过皮肤吸收并通过血液循环发挥作用,与口服双氯芬酸相比,DSSP可减少胃肠道粘膜损伤的发生。本研究旨在比较 DSSP 与口服双氯芬酸钠片剂(DST)对上消化道粘膜的影响:这项随机、评估者盲法研究纳入了日本的腰背痛(LBP)患者。患者接受了为期两周的 DSSP(150 毫克/天)或 DST(75 毫克/天)治疗。主要终点是研究治疗后上消化道内镜检查中胃十二指肠溃疡和/或糜烂的发生率:30名患者被随机分配到DSSP组和DST组。DSSP组和DST组的胃十二指肠溃疡和/或糜烂发生率分别为26.7%和86.2%。发生率的差异为-59.5%(95% 置信区间:-77.0 至-34.6)。DSSP 组未观察到不良事件 (AE),DST 组有 20.0% (6/30 名患者)报告了轻度不良事件(不包括溃疡和糜烂):结论:在枸杞多糖症患者中,DSSP 与 DST 相比,胃肠道粘膜损伤的风险更低,DST 的活性成分相同,但给药途径不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
2.40%
发文量
326
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology is produced 12 times per year and publishes peer-reviewed original papers, reviews and editorials concerned with clinical practice and research in the fields of hepatology, gastroenterology and endoscopy. Papers cover the medical, radiological, pathological, biochemical, physiological and historical aspects of the subject areas. All submitted papers are reviewed by at least two referees expert in the field of the submitted paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信