A Feasibility Study on the Efficacy and Safety of a Novel Tip-Flexible Suction Ureteral Access Sheath Combined with Flexible Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy for Treating Kidney Stones ≥30 mm.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Wenwei Chen, Kaixin Lu, Changyi Liu, Jinfeng Weng, Rui Gao
{"title":"A Feasibility Study on the Efficacy and Safety of a Novel Tip-Flexible Suction Ureteral Access Sheath Combined with Flexible Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy for Treating Kidney Stones ≥30 mm.","authors":"Wenwei Chen, Kaixin Lu, Changyi Liu, Jinfeng Weng, Rui Gao","doi":"10.1089/end.2024.0283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Objective:</i></b> To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a novel tip-flexible suction ureteral access sheath (NTFS-UAS) combined with flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy (FURS) for treating kidney stones ≥30 mm in a large cohort. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> The clinical data of 206 patients with renal calculi ≥30 mm treated by NTFS-UAS combined with FURS from June 2021 to September 2023 were analyzed retrospectively. The outcomes under investigation encompassed demographic information, stone-related characteristics, operative time, stone-free rates (SFRs), and postoperative complications. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The median operation duration was 110 minutes (interquartile 84.00-146.25 minutes). Immediate and 1-month SFRs were 83.98% and 85.44%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed five risk factors independently affecting stone clearance rate: stone size (≥50 mm, odds ratio [OR] = 3.826, <i>p</i> = 0.039), stone number (multiple: OR = 8.745, <i>p</i> = 0.015), stone location (multiple calyces: OR = 10.371, <i>p</i> = 0.045; lower calyx: OR = 9.615, <i>p</i> = 0.047), severe hydronephrosis (OR = 8.338, <i>p</i> = 0.002), and the Resorlu-Unsal scoring system (RUSS) score (6-7: OR = 10.829, <i>p</i> = 0.009; 4-5: OR = 4.223, <i>p</i> = 0.008). The incidence of Clavien-Dindo grade II-III complication was 5.82%. Positive preoperative urine culture (OR = 9.533, <i>p</i> = 0.012) and RUSS score (6-7: OR = 25.678, <i>p</i> = 0.026; 4-5: OR = 11.444, <i>p</i> = 0.038) were identified as the most important variables that may contribute to the development of high-grade postoperative complications. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> NFTS-UAS combined with FURS achieved satisfactory outcomes with good efficacy and safety for treating large renal stones ≥30 mm, and it can be utilized as an effective treatment option for patients having contraindications or preference against percutaneous nephrolithotomy. In addition, clinical factors, such as stone size, severe hydronephrosis, positive preoperative urine culture, and RUSS stone score that likely affected the outcomes of NFTS-UAS, should be fully taken into account when the surgeon performing FURS using NFTS-UAS.</p>","PeriodicalId":15723,"journal":{"name":"Journal of endourology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of endourology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2024.0283","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a novel tip-flexible suction ureteral access sheath (NTFS-UAS) combined with flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy (FURS) for treating kidney stones ≥30 mm in a large cohort. Methods: The clinical data of 206 patients with renal calculi ≥30 mm treated by NTFS-UAS combined with FURS from June 2021 to September 2023 were analyzed retrospectively. The outcomes under investigation encompassed demographic information, stone-related characteristics, operative time, stone-free rates (SFRs), and postoperative complications. Results: The median operation duration was 110 minutes (interquartile 84.00-146.25 minutes). Immediate and 1-month SFRs were 83.98% and 85.44%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed five risk factors independently affecting stone clearance rate: stone size (≥50 mm, odds ratio [OR] = 3.826, p = 0.039), stone number (multiple: OR = 8.745, p = 0.015), stone location (multiple calyces: OR = 10.371, p = 0.045; lower calyx: OR = 9.615, p = 0.047), severe hydronephrosis (OR = 8.338, p = 0.002), and the Resorlu-Unsal scoring system (RUSS) score (6-7: OR = 10.829, p = 0.009; 4-5: OR = 4.223, p = 0.008). The incidence of Clavien-Dindo grade II-III complication was 5.82%. Positive preoperative urine culture (OR = 9.533, p = 0.012) and RUSS score (6-7: OR = 25.678, p = 0.026; 4-5: OR = 11.444, p = 0.038) were identified as the most important variables that may contribute to the development of high-grade postoperative complications. Conclusion: NFTS-UAS combined with FURS achieved satisfactory outcomes with good efficacy and safety for treating large renal stones ≥30 mm, and it can be utilized as an effective treatment option for patients having contraindications or preference against percutaneous nephrolithotomy. In addition, clinical factors, such as stone size, severe hydronephrosis, positive preoperative urine culture, and RUSS stone score that likely affected the outcomes of NFTS-UAS, should be fully taken into account when the surgeon performing FURS using NFTS-UAS.

新型尖端柔性抽吸输尿管接入鞘结合输尿管软镜碎石术治疗≥30毫米肾结石的有效性和安全性的可行性研究。
目的评估新型尖端柔性抽吸输尿管通路鞘(NTFS-UAS)与柔性输尿管镜碎石术(FURS)联合治疗≥30 mm肾结石的疗效和安全性。研究方法回顾性分析了2021年6月至2023年9月期间206例接受NTFS-UAS联合FURS治疗的肾结石≥30毫米患者的临床数据。研究结果包括人口统计学信息、结石相关特征、手术时间、无结石率(SFR)和术后并发症。结果显示手术时间中位数为 110 分钟(四分位数为 84.00-146.25 分钟)。即刻无结石率和一个月无结石率分别为 83.98% 和 85.44%。多变量分析显示,以下五个风险因素对结石清除率有独立影响:结石大小(≥50 毫米,几率比 [OR] = 3.826,P = 0.039)、结石数量(多个:OR = 8.745,P = 0.015)、结石位置(多个肾盏:OR=10.371,p=0.045;下萼:OR=9.615,p=0.047)、严重肾积水(OR=8.338,p=0.002)和Resorlu-Unsal评分系统(RUSS)评分(6-7:OR=10.829,p=0.009;4-5:OR=4.223,p=0.008)。Clavien-Dindo II-III 级并发症的发生率为 5.82%。术前尿培养阳性(OR = 9.533,p = 0.012)和 RUSS 评分(6-7:OR = 25.678,p = 0.026;4-5:OR = 11.444,p = 0.038)被认为是可能导致术后高级别并发症发生的最重要变量。结论NFTS-UAS联合FURS治疗≥30毫米的大块肾结石取得了令人满意的疗效,具有良好的有效性和安全性,可作为有经皮肾镜取石术禁忌症或偏好的患者的有效治疗方案。此外,外科医生在使用 NFTS-UAS 进行 FURS 治疗时,应充分考虑结石大小、严重肾积水、术前尿培养阳性和 RUSS 结石评分等可能影响 NFTS-UAS 治疗效果的临床因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of endourology
Journal of endourology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
14.80%
发文量
254
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Endourology, JE Case Reports, and Videourology are the leading peer-reviewed journal, case reports publication, and innovative videojournal companion covering all aspects of minimally invasive urology research, applications, and clinical outcomes. The leading journal of minimally invasive urology for over 30 years, Journal of Endourology is the essential publication for practicing surgeons who want to keep up with the latest surgical technologies in endoscopic, laparoscopic, robotic, and image-guided procedures as they apply to benign and malignant diseases of the genitourinary tract. This flagship journal includes the companion videojournal Videourology™ with every subscription. While Journal of Endourology remains focused on publishing rigorously peer reviewed articles, Videourology accepts original videos containing material that has not been reported elsewhere, except in the form of an abstract or a conference presentation. Journal of Endourology coverage includes: The latest laparoscopic, robotic, endoscopic, and image-guided techniques for treating both benign and malignant conditions Pioneering research articles Controversial cases in endourology Techniques in endourology with accompanying videos Reviews and epochs in endourology Endourology survey section of endourology relevant manuscripts published in other journals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信