Exploring Jordanian medical students' perceptions and concerns about ChatGPT in medical education: a cross-sectional study.

IF 3.3 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice Pub Date : 2024-11-25 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1080/20523211.2024.2429000
Adnan Abu Hammour, Khawla Abu Hammour, Hamza Alhamad, Razan Nassar, Faris El-Dahiyat, Majd Sawaqed, Aya Allan, Qusai Manaseer, Mohammad Abu Hammour, Abdulsalam Halboup, Rana Abu Farha
{"title":"Exploring Jordanian medical students' perceptions and concerns about ChatGPT in medical education: a cross-sectional study.","authors":"Adnan Abu Hammour, Khawla Abu Hammour, Hamza Alhamad, Razan Nassar, Faris El-Dahiyat, Majd Sawaqed, Aya Allan, Qusai Manaseer, Mohammad Abu Hammour, Abdulsalam Halboup, Rana Abu Farha","doi":"10.1080/20523211.2024.2429000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools like ChatGPT into medical education is expanding, offering benefits such as efficient information synthesis. However, concerns about the accuracy, reliability, and proper use of these tools persist. Understanding medical students' perceptions of ChatGPT is crucial for optimising its use in educational settings.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate how medical students perceive ChatGPT for educational purposes and to assess its perceived advantages and disadvantages.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was carried out using a questionnaire with five main domains to explore Jordanian medical students' perceptions, practices, and concerns regarding the ChatGPT. This study was conducted from May to July, 2023, and the data were collected using the convenience sampling technique through Google Forms shared within medical students' Facebook groups. Descriptive statistics summarised participant demographics, while logistic regression identified factors influencing ChatGPT usage. Variables with a <i>P</i>-value ≤ 0.05 in multiple regression were considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nearly two-thirds (N = 136, 61.5%) claimed to have knowledge of AI but not in clinical settings. Most participants (88.5%, N = 216) were aware of ChatGPT, with 86.9% (N = 212) agreeing that 'Medical students can benefit from using ChatGPT.' Additionally, 83.2% (N = 203) felt that 'ChatGPT helps students quickly and easily summarize complex information.' Conversely, 78.3% (N = 191) expressed concerns about ChatGPT's potential inaccuracies, with accuracy and reliability cited as primary concerns. Multiple logistic regression showed that younger students (OR = 0.902, <i>P</i> = 0.025) and those with lower proficiency (OR = 0.487, <i>P</i> = 0.007) used ChatGPT more frequently than others.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although the use of the ChatGPT could be more beneficial for aiding students in developing medical knowledge, evidence-based academic regulations should guide its use. Future research should be conducted to examine the enablers and barriers to ChatGPT use in medical education.</p>","PeriodicalId":16740,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice","volume":"17 1","pages":"2429000"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11590191/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20523211.2024.2429000","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools like ChatGPT into medical education is expanding, offering benefits such as efficient information synthesis. However, concerns about the accuracy, reliability, and proper use of these tools persist. Understanding medical students' perceptions of ChatGPT is crucial for optimising its use in educational settings.

Objectives: To evaluate how medical students perceive ChatGPT for educational purposes and to assess its perceived advantages and disadvantages.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was carried out using a questionnaire with five main domains to explore Jordanian medical students' perceptions, practices, and concerns regarding the ChatGPT. This study was conducted from May to July, 2023, and the data were collected using the convenience sampling technique through Google Forms shared within medical students' Facebook groups. Descriptive statistics summarised participant demographics, while logistic regression identified factors influencing ChatGPT usage. Variables with a P-value ≤ 0.05 in multiple regression were considered statistically significant.

Results: Nearly two-thirds (N = 136, 61.5%) claimed to have knowledge of AI but not in clinical settings. Most participants (88.5%, N = 216) were aware of ChatGPT, with 86.9% (N = 212) agreeing that 'Medical students can benefit from using ChatGPT.' Additionally, 83.2% (N = 203) felt that 'ChatGPT helps students quickly and easily summarize complex information.' Conversely, 78.3% (N = 191) expressed concerns about ChatGPT's potential inaccuracies, with accuracy and reliability cited as primary concerns. Multiple logistic regression showed that younger students (OR = 0.902, P = 0.025) and those with lower proficiency (OR = 0.487, P = 0.007) used ChatGPT more frequently than others.

Conclusion: Although the use of the ChatGPT could be more beneficial for aiding students in developing medical knowledge, evidence-based academic regulations should guide its use. Future research should be conducted to examine the enablers and barriers to ChatGPT use in medical education.

探索约旦医科学生对医学教育中 ChatGPT 的看法和担忧:一项横断面研究。
背景:人工智能(AI)工具(如 ChatGPT)与医学教育的结合正在不断扩大,其优势包括高效的信息合成。然而,人们对这些工具的准确性、可靠性和正确使用仍然存在担忧。了解医学生对 ChatGPT 的看法对于优化其在教育环境中的使用至关重要:评估医学生如何看待用于教育目的的 ChatGPT,并评估其优缺点:方法: 采用包含五个主要领域的调查问卷进行了一项横向研究,以探讨约旦医科学生对 ChatGPT 的看法、做法和担忧。本研究于 2023 年 5 月至 7 月进行,采用便利抽样技术,通过在医学生 Facebook 群组中共享的谷歌表格收集数据。描述性统计总结了参与者的人口统计学特征,而逻辑回归则确定了影响 ChatGPT 使用的因素。多元回归中 P 值小于 0.05 的变量被认为具有统计学意义:近三分之二的参与者(136 人,61.5%)声称了解人工智能,但不了解临床环境。大多数参与者(88.5%,N = 216)知道 ChatGPT,86.9%(N = 212)同意 "医学生可以从使用 ChatGPT 中获益"。相反,78.3%(N = 191)的人对 ChatGPT 可能存在的不准确性表示担忧,主要担忧是准确性和可靠性。多元逻辑回归显示,年龄较小的学生(OR = 0.902,P = 0.025)和水平较低的学生(OR = 0.487,P = 0.007)比其他学生更经常使用 ChatGPT:结论:尽管使用 ChatGPT 更有利于帮助学生掌握医学知识,但应以循证学术规范为指导。未来应开展研究,探讨在医学教育中使用 ChatGPT 的促进因素和障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice Health Professions-Pharmacy
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
9.50%
发文量
81
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信