Clinical Implication of Brain Metastases En-Bloc Resection: Surgical Technique Description and Literature Review.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Roberto Altieri, Sergio Corvino, Giuseppe La Rocca, Fabio Cofano, Antonio Melcarne, Diego Garbossa, Manlio Barbarisi
{"title":"Clinical Implication of Brain Metastases En-Bloc Resection: Surgical Technique Description and Literature Review.","authors":"Roberto Altieri, Sergio Corvino, Giuseppe La Rocca, Fabio Cofano, Antonio Melcarne, Diego Garbossa, Manlio Barbarisi","doi":"10.3390/jpm14111110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The role of brain metastases (BM) surgery is of paramount importance for patients' progression-free and overall survival. \"En-bloc\" and \"piecemeal\" resection represent the main surgical techniques. Although en-bloc resection remains the best surgical option, it is not widely adopted or feasible as the first choice. We describe our point of view about the en-bloc surgical technique with an illustrative case and discuss its indications with pros and cons through a comprehensive literature review. <b>Materials and methods:</b> A Medline search up to December 2023 in the Embase and PubMed online electronic databases was made and PRISMA statement was followed. An illustrative case of \"en-bloc\" resection from our surgical series was also added as a technical note. <b>Results:</b> We describe tips and tricks of our surgical technique and added a surgical video from our series. The literature review disclosed 19 studies. Resulting data suggested that \"en-bloc\" resection, when feasible, provides lesser risk of leptomeningeal dissemination, local recurrence rates, intraoperative bleeding occurrence and perioperative complications; in addition, it preserves the normal anatomy. <b>Conclusions:</b> En-bloc resection is the gold standard technique for surgical treatment of brain metastases especially for patients with superficial lesions that are small in size and far from eloquent areas.</p>","PeriodicalId":16722,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personalized Medicine","volume":"14 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11596013/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Personalized Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm14111110","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The role of brain metastases (BM) surgery is of paramount importance for patients' progression-free and overall survival. "En-bloc" and "piecemeal" resection represent the main surgical techniques. Although en-bloc resection remains the best surgical option, it is not widely adopted or feasible as the first choice. We describe our point of view about the en-bloc surgical technique with an illustrative case and discuss its indications with pros and cons through a comprehensive literature review. Materials and methods: A Medline search up to December 2023 in the Embase and PubMed online electronic databases was made and PRISMA statement was followed. An illustrative case of "en-bloc" resection from our surgical series was also added as a technical note. Results: We describe tips and tricks of our surgical technique and added a surgical video from our series. The literature review disclosed 19 studies. Resulting data suggested that "en-bloc" resection, when feasible, provides lesser risk of leptomeningeal dissemination, local recurrence rates, intraoperative bleeding occurrence and perioperative complications; in addition, it preserves the normal anatomy. Conclusions: En-bloc resection is the gold standard technique for surgical treatment of brain metastases especially for patients with superficial lesions that are small in size and far from eloquent areas.

脑转移灶环形切除术的临床意义:手术技术描述和文献综述。
背景:脑转移(BM)手术对患者的无进展生存期和总生存期至关重要。"整体 "和 "分块 "切除是主要的手术技术。虽然整体切除仍是最佳的手术方案,但作为首选并不被广泛采用,也不可行。我们将通过一个示例病例来阐述我们对全切手术技术的观点,并通过全面的文献综述来讨论其适应症及利弊。材料和方法:在 Embase 和 PubMed 在线电子数据库中进行了截至 2023 年 12 月的 Medline 检索,并遵循了 PRISMA 声明。此外,还添加了本院手术系列中的一例 "全切 "病例作为技术说明。结果:我们介绍了手术技巧和窍门,并添加了我们的系列手术视频。文献综述披露了 19 项研究。研究结果表明,在可行的情况下,"全块 "切除术可降低肿瘤脑膜播散的风险、局部复发率、术中出血发生率和围手术期并发症;此外,它还能保留正常的解剖结构。结论整体切除术是手术治疗脑转移瘤的金标准技术,尤其适用于病灶较小且远离脑区的表浅病灶患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Personalized Medicine
Journal of Personalized Medicine Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1878
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Personalized Medicine (JPM; ISSN 2075-4426) is an international, open access journal aimed at bringing all aspects of personalized medicine to one platform. JPM publishes cutting edge, innovative preclinical and translational scientific research and technologies related to personalized medicine (e.g., pharmacogenomics/proteomics, systems biology). JPM recognizes that personalized medicine—the assessment of genetic, environmental and host factors that cause variability of individuals—is a challenging, transdisciplinary topic that requires discussions from a range of experts. For a comprehensive perspective of personalized medicine, JPM aims to integrate expertise from the molecular and translational sciences, therapeutics and diagnostics, as well as discussions of regulatory, social, ethical and policy aspects. We provide a forum to bring together academic and clinical researchers, biotechnology, diagnostic and pharmaceutical companies, health professionals, regulatory and ethical experts, and government and regulatory authorities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信