Relevance of therapeutic prescription modifications in Dutch community pharmacies.

IF 1.5 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Ellen van Loon, Mette Heringa, Annemieke Floor-Schreudering, Peter de Smet, Marcel Bouvy
{"title":"Relevance of therapeutic prescription modifications in Dutch community pharmacies.","authors":"Ellen van Loon, Mette Heringa, Annemieke Floor-Schreudering, Peter de Smet, Marcel Bouvy","doi":"10.1093/ijpp/riae060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Community pharmacists modify prescriptions to solve or prevent drug-related problems. To assess the relevance of prescription modifications, they are usually judged on clinical outcomes only, overlooking their humanistic and economic impact. This study aims to evaluate therapeutic prescription modifications performed by Dutch community pharmacists in terms of clinical outcome, along with the humanistic aspect \"usability\" and economic aspect \"efficiency.\"</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multidisciplinary panel evaluated the relevance of 160 cases of therapeutic prescription modifications collected in community pharmacies. Cases were stratified for type of drug-related problem based on their frequency in the original set of modifications. Both the relevance in general and the impact on the individual aspects of effectiveness and medication safety, usability, and efficiency were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Key findings: </strong>Sixteen cases (10.0%) were excluded because of insufficient information for evaluation. Sixty percent of the 144 cases were evaluated as relevant (56.3% relevant and 4.2% highly relevant). The remaining cases (31.9%) were moderately relevant. For 7.6% of the cases, evaluations were inconclusive. In 25.0% of the cases, there was a major improvement on at least one of the aspects effectiveness, medication safety, usability, or efficiency.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The majority of therapeutic prescription modifications performed by Dutch community pharmacists were evaluated as relevant or highly relevant by a multidisciplinary panel. Modifications improved clinical, humanistic, and economic aspects. This shows the important role of community pharmacists in primary healthcare. Sharing more clinical information like indication, illness severity, and treatment plan will enable pharmacists to improve their contribution to safe medication use.</p>","PeriodicalId":14284,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Pharmacy Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Pharmacy Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpp/riae060","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Community pharmacists modify prescriptions to solve or prevent drug-related problems. To assess the relevance of prescription modifications, they are usually judged on clinical outcomes only, overlooking their humanistic and economic impact. This study aims to evaluate therapeutic prescription modifications performed by Dutch community pharmacists in terms of clinical outcome, along with the humanistic aspect "usability" and economic aspect "efficiency."

Methods: A multidisciplinary panel evaluated the relevance of 160 cases of therapeutic prescription modifications collected in community pharmacies. Cases were stratified for type of drug-related problem based on their frequency in the original set of modifications. Both the relevance in general and the impact on the individual aspects of effectiveness and medication safety, usability, and efficiency were evaluated.

Key findings: Sixteen cases (10.0%) were excluded because of insufficient information for evaluation. Sixty percent of the 144 cases were evaluated as relevant (56.3% relevant and 4.2% highly relevant). The remaining cases (31.9%) were moderately relevant. For 7.6% of the cases, evaluations were inconclusive. In 25.0% of the cases, there was a major improvement on at least one of the aspects effectiveness, medication safety, usability, or efficiency.

Conclusions: The majority of therapeutic prescription modifications performed by Dutch community pharmacists were evaluated as relevant or highly relevant by a multidisciplinary panel. Modifications improved clinical, humanistic, and economic aspects. This shows the important role of community pharmacists in primary healthcare. Sharing more clinical information like indication, illness severity, and treatment plan will enable pharmacists to improve their contribution to safe medication use.

荷兰社区药房修改治疗处方的相关性。
目标:社区药剂师通过修改处方来解决或预防与药物有关的问题。为了评估处方修改的相关性,通常只根据临床结果来判断,而忽略了其对人文和经济的影响。本研究旨在从临床效果、人文方面的 "可用性 "和经济方面的 "效率 "对荷兰社区药剂师进行的治疗性处方修改进行评估:一个多学科小组对社区药房收集的 160 个治疗处方修改案例的相关性进行了评估。根据病例在原始处方修改中出现的频率,对其药物相关问题的类型进行了分层。对总体相关性以及对有效性、用药安全、可用性和效率等个别方面的影响进行了评估:由于评估信息不足,16 个案例(10.0%)被排除在外。在 144 个案例中,有 60% 被评为相关(56.3% 为相关,4.2% 为高度相关)。其余病例(31.9%)为中度相关。7.6% 的病例没有得出结论。在 25.0% 的案例中,至少在有效性、用药安全性、可用性或效率中的一个方面有重大改进:结论:荷兰社区药剂师对大多数治疗处方的修改都被多学科小组评为相关或高度相关。处方修改改善了临床、人文和经济方面。这表明了社区药剂师在初级医疗保健中的重要作用。共享更多的临床信息,如适应症、疾病严重程度和治疗方案,将使药剂师在安全用药方面做出更大的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
146
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Pharmacy Practice (IJPP) is a Medline-indexed, peer reviewed, international journal. It is one of the leading journals publishing health services research in the context of pharmacy, pharmaceutical care, medicines and medicines management. Regular sections in the journal include, editorials, literature reviews, original research, personal opinion and short communications. Topics covered include: medicines utilisation, medicine management, medicines distribution, supply and administration, pharmaceutical services, professional and patient/lay perspectives, public health (including, e.g. health promotion, needs assessment, health protection) evidence based practice, pharmacy education. Methods include both evaluative and exploratory work including, randomised controlled trials, surveys, epidemiological approaches, case studies, observational studies, and qualitative methods such as interviews and focus groups. Application of methods drawn from other disciplines e.g. psychology, health economics, morbidity are especially welcome as are developments of new methodologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信