Examining the Severity and Progression of Illicitly Manufactured Fentanyl Withdrawal: A Quasi-Experimental Comparison.

IF 4.2 3区 医学 Q1 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Anjalee Sharma, Kelly E Dunn, Katja Schmid-Doyle, Sarah Dowell, Narie Kim, Eric C Strain, Cecilia Bergeria
{"title":"Examining the Severity and Progression of Illicitly Manufactured Fentanyl Withdrawal: A Quasi-Experimental Comparison.","authors":"Anjalee Sharma, Kelly E Dunn, Katja Schmid-Doyle, Sarah Dowell, Narie Kim, Eric C Strain, Cecilia Bergeria","doi":"10.1097/ADM.0000000000001395","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Illicitly manufactured fentanyl has largely replaced heroin throughout the United States. Characteristics of fentanyl-specific withdrawal are not well understood compared to traditional opioid withdrawal. This study examines opioid withdrawal severity among 2 cohorts of study participants who underwent identical morphine stabilization procedures before and after fentanyl was introduced to the local drug market.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Non-Fentanyl study (n = 103) included participants testing positive for non-fentanyl opioids, and the Fentanyl study (n = 30) included participants testing positive for fentanyl. Both studies completed a 7-day morphine stabilization protocol (30 mg subcutaneous, 4 times daily) and multiple daily self-report and observer-rated assessments of opioid withdrawal and vital signs. Two-way repeated-measures analyses of variance (ANOVAs) examined the effects of study, time, and study × time on daily peak ratings for each outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were significant elevations in self-report and observer-rated withdrawal scores among the Fentanyl versus Non-Fentanyl study (study × time, P < 0.05) during stabilization days 2-5 and days 2-6, respectively. There was a higher rate of tachycardia among the Fentanyl group compared to the Non-Fentanyl study, and peak diastolic blood pressure was greater among the Fentanyl study compared to the Non-Fentanyl study.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Individuals with fentanyl exposure were less stabilized by morphine and experienced more severe opioid withdrawal via several metrics compared to persons with non-fentanyl opioid exposure. Withdrawal also remained elevated for several days despite morphine initiation. Adjustments to existing treatment induction protocols may be needed given the permeation of fentanyl into the heroin supply.</p>","PeriodicalId":14744,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Addiction Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Addiction Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ADM.0000000000001395","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Illicitly manufactured fentanyl has largely replaced heroin throughout the United States. Characteristics of fentanyl-specific withdrawal are not well understood compared to traditional opioid withdrawal. This study examines opioid withdrawal severity among 2 cohorts of study participants who underwent identical morphine stabilization procedures before and after fentanyl was introduced to the local drug market.

Methods: The Non-Fentanyl study (n = 103) included participants testing positive for non-fentanyl opioids, and the Fentanyl study (n = 30) included participants testing positive for fentanyl. Both studies completed a 7-day morphine stabilization protocol (30 mg subcutaneous, 4 times daily) and multiple daily self-report and observer-rated assessments of opioid withdrawal and vital signs. Two-way repeated-measures analyses of variance (ANOVAs) examined the effects of study, time, and study × time on daily peak ratings for each outcome.

Results: There were significant elevations in self-report and observer-rated withdrawal scores among the Fentanyl versus Non-Fentanyl study (study × time, P < 0.05) during stabilization days 2-5 and days 2-6, respectively. There was a higher rate of tachycardia among the Fentanyl group compared to the Non-Fentanyl study, and peak diastolic blood pressure was greater among the Fentanyl study compared to the Non-Fentanyl study.

Conclusions: Individuals with fentanyl exposure were less stabilized by morphine and experienced more severe opioid withdrawal via several metrics compared to persons with non-fentanyl opioid exposure. Withdrawal also remained elevated for several days despite morphine initiation. Adjustments to existing treatment induction protocols may be needed given the permeation of fentanyl into the heroin supply.

研究非法制造的芬太尼戒断的严重程度和进展:准实验比较。
目标:在美国,非法制造的芬太尼已在很大程度上取代了海洛因。与传统的阿片类药物戒断相比,芬太尼特异性戒断的特征尚不十分清楚。本研究对在芬太尼进入当地毒品市场之前和之后接受了相同的吗啡稳定程序的两组研究参与者的阿片类戒断严重程度进行了调查:非芬太尼研究(n = 103)包括对非芬太尼类阿片检测呈阳性的参与者,芬太尼研究(n = 30)包括对芬太尼检测呈阳性的参与者。这两项研究都完成了为期 7 天的吗啡稳定方案(30 毫克皮下注射,每天 4 次),并对阿片类药物戒断和生命体征进行了多次每日自我报告和观察评估。双向重复测量方差分析(ANOVA)检验了研究、时间和研究×时间对每种结果的每日峰值评分的影响:在稳定期第 2-5 天和第 2-6 天,芬太尼研究与非芬太尼研究的自我报告和观察者评定的戒断评分分别有明显升高(研究 × 时间,P < 0.05)。芬太尼组心动过速发生率高于非芬太尼组,芬太尼组舒张压峰值高于非芬太尼组:结论:与暴露于非芬太尼类阿片的患者相比,暴露于芬太尼类阿片的患者在使用吗啡后的稳定性较差,并且在多个指标上经历了更严重的阿片类药物戒断。尽管开始使用吗啡,但戒断症状在数天内仍会持续升高。鉴于芬太尼已渗透到海洛因供应中,可能需要对现有的治疗诱导方案进行调整。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Addiction Medicine
Journal of Addiction Medicine 医学-药物滥用
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
260
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of Journal of Addiction Medicine, the official peer-reviewed journal of the American Society of Addiction Medicine, is to promote excellence in the practice of addiction medicine and in clinical research as well as to support Addiction Medicine as a mainstream medical sub-specialty. Under the guidance of an esteemed Editorial Board, peer-reviewed articles published in the Journal focus on developments in addiction medicine as well as on treatment innovations and ethical, economic, forensic, and social topics including: •addiction and substance use in pregnancy •adolescent addiction and at-risk use •the drug-exposed neonate •pharmacology •all psychoactive substances relevant to addiction, including alcohol, nicotine, caffeine, marijuana, opioids, stimulants and other prescription and illicit substances •diagnosis •neuroimaging techniques •treatment of special populations •treatment, early intervention and prevention of alcohol and drug use disorders •methodological issues in addiction research •pain and addiction, prescription drug use disorder •co-occurring addiction, medical and psychiatric disorders •pathological gambling disorder, sexual and other behavioral addictions •pathophysiology of addiction •behavioral and pharmacological treatments •issues in graduate medical education •recovery •health services delivery •ethical, legal and liability issues in addiction medicine practice •drug testing •self- and mutual-help.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信