Association between lactate-to-albumin ratio and short-term prognosis of acute-on-chronic liver failure treated with artificial liver support system.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Yuanji Ma, Lingyao Du, Lang Bai, Hong Tang
{"title":"Association between lactate-to-albumin ratio and short-term prognosis of acute-on-chronic liver failure treated with artificial liver support system.","authors":"Yuanji Ma, Lingyao Du, Lang Bai, Hong Tang","doi":"10.1097/MEG.0000000000002885","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The impact of lactate-to-albumin ratio (LAR) on the outcome of acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) is scant.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To investigate the relationship between LAR and short-term prognosis in patients with COSSH (Chinese Group on the Study of Severe Hepatitis B) ACLF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted in patients with COSSH ACLF treated with an artificial liver support system. Restricted cubic splines, linear regression models, and Cox regression models were used to investigate the relationships of LAR with disease severity and 28-day prognosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 28-day transplant-free and overall survival rates in the 258 eligible patients were 76.4% and 82.2%, respectively. The LAR in 28-day transplant-free survivors was lower than that in transplant or death patients [0.74 (0.58-0.98) vs. 1.03 (0.79-1.35), P <  0.001]. The LAR was positively associated with disease severity, 28-day transplant-free survival [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) (95% confidence interval (CI)) for transplant or death: 2.18 (1.37-3.46), P =  0.001], and overall survival [adjusted HR (95% CI) for death: 2.14 (1.21-3.80), P =  0.009]. Compared with patients with LAR < 1.01, patients with LAR ≥ 1.01 had poor 28-day prognosis [all adjusted HR (95% CI) > 1, P  < 0.05]. Lactate was not a potential modifier of the relationship between LAR and short-term prognosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LAR was positively associated with disease severity and poor short-term prognosis in patients with COSSH ACLF.</p>","PeriodicalId":11999,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology","volume":" ","pages":"327-336"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11781548/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MEG.0000000000002885","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The impact of lactate-to-albumin ratio (LAR) on the outcome of acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) is scant.

Aims: To investigate the relationship between LAR and short-term prognosis in patients with COSSH (Chinese Group on the Study of Severe Hepatitis B) ACLF.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted in patients with COSSH ACLF treated with an artificial liver support system. Restricted cubic splines, linear regression models, and Cox regression models were used to investigate the relationships of LAR with disease severity and 28-day prognosis.

Results: The 28-day transplant-free and overall survival rates in the 258 eligible patients were 76.4% and 82.2%, respectively. The LAR in 28-day transplant-free survivors was lower than that in transplant or death patients [0.74 (0.58-0.98) vs. 1.03 (0.79-1.35), P <  0.001]. The LAR was positively associated with disease severity, 28-day transplant-free survival [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) (95% confidence interval (CI)) for transplant or death: 2.18 (1.37-3.46), P =  0.001], and overall survival [adjusted HR (95% CI) for death: 2.14 (1.21-3.80), P =  0.009]. Compared with patients with LAR < 1.01, patients with LAR ≥ 1.01 had poor 28-day prognosis [all adjusted HR (95% CI) > 1, P  < 0.05]. Lactate was not a potential modifier of the relationship between LAR and short-term prognosis.

Conclusion: LAR was positively associated with disease severity and poor short-term prognosis in patients with COSSH ACLF.

使用人工肝支持系统治疗急性-慢性肝衰竭患者的乳酸-白蛋白比值与短期预后的关系。
背景:目的:研究中国重症乙型肝炎研究组(COSSH)ACLF患者的乳酸白蛋白比值(LAR)与短期预后的关系:方法:对接受人工肝支持系统治疗的 COSSH ACLF 患者进行回顾性队列研究。采用限制性三次样条、线性回归模型和 Cox 回归模型研究 LAR 与疾病严重程度和 28 天预后的关系:结果:258 名符合条件的患者的 28 天无移植生存率和总生存率分别为 76.4% 和 82.2%。28天无移植生存者的LAR低于移植或死亡患者[0.74 (0.58-0.98) vs. 1.03 (0.79-1.35),P < 0.001]。LAR与疾病严重程度、28天无移植生存率[移植或死亡的调整后危险比(HR)(95% 置信区间(CI)):2.18(1.37-3.46),P = 0.001]和总生存率[死亡的调整后危险比(HR)(95% CI):2.14(1.21-3.80),P = 0.009]呈正相关。与 LAR < 1.01 的患者相比,LAR ≥ 1.01 的患者 28 天预后较差[调整后 HR (95% CI) > 1,P < 0.05]。乳酸不是LAR与短期预后关系的潜在调节因素:结论:LAR与COSSH ACLF患者的疾病严重程度和短期预后不良呈正相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.80%
发文量
269
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology publishes papers reporting original clinical and scientific research which are of a high standard and which contribute to the advancement of knowledge in the field of gastroenterology and hepatology. The journal publishes three types of manuscript: in-depth reviews (by invitation only), full papers and case reports. Manuscripts submitted to the journal will be accepted on the understanding that the author has not previously submitted the paper to another journal or had the material published elsewhere. Authors are asked to disclose any affiliations, including financial, consultant, or institutional associations, that might lead to bias or a conflict of interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信