Microbiological and Physicochemical Profile of Traditionally Produced Chouriça de Carne Dry-Fermented Sausages: Towards Benchmarking of Products Against Established Quality Groups.

IF 4.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Foods Pub Date : 2024-11-20 DOI:10.3390/foods13223705
Ana Sofia Faria, Olga María Bonilla-Luque, Laís Carvalho, Nathália Fernandes, Miguel Angel Prieto, Vasco Cadavez, Ursula Gonzales-Barron
{"title":"Microbiological and Physicochemical Profile of Traditionally Produced <i>Chouriça de Carne</i> Dry-Fermented Sausages: Towards Benchmarking of Products Against Established Quality Groups.","authors":"Ana Sofia Faria, Olga María Bonilla-Luque, Laís Carvalho, Nathália Fernandes, Miguel Angel Prieto, Vasco Cadavez, Ursula Gonzales-Barron","doi":"10.3390/foods13223705","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The physicochemical and microbiological properties of traditional Portuguese ready-to-eat dry fermented sausage <i>chouriça de carne</i> samples from 14 regional producers were analysed and subjected to multivariate analysis to determine the relationships between them and to evaluate how the quality and safety of these sausages is affected by these properties. Producer-mean values for physicochemical analyses were quite variable, with intervals of 4.87-6.11 for pH, 0.803-0.965 for a<sub>w</sub>, moisture 19.5-48.5%, protein 32.0-60.1% (db), fat 22.0-53.3% (db), ash 3.52-9.69% (db), and carbohydrates 1.66-13.5% (db). Mesophilic counts varied (5.61-8.68 log CFU/g), while lactic acid bacteria were generally high (MRS: 8.21-10.2; M17: 7.66-10.0 log CFU/g). <i>S. aureus</i> was enumerated in levels up to 2.55 log CFU/g, while presumptive <i>C. perfringens</i> never surpassed 2 log CFU/g. <i>Salmonella</i> spp. and <i>Listeria</i> spp. were also detected in the samples tested. Principal component (PC) analysis yielded a three-dimension solution that explained 60% of the data variation; PC1 (26%) characterized chorizo formulations with more meat, while PC2 (19.3%) described sausages with longer/rapid fermentation, and PC3 (14.5%) highlighted <i>chouriços</i> with poorer hygiene. Cluster analysis identified three quality groups: (i) chorizos with high moisture, high protein content, and lowest pH; (ii) sausages with low moisture, high fat content, and elevated pH; and (iii) <i>chouriças</i> with high moisture and high protein but lower fat contents, low pH, and improved hygiene. Lastly, factor analysis yielded a varimax-rotated three-factor solution that explained 65% of the data, with similar results to PCA; factor 1 (23.5%) depicted chorizos with low pH but high moisture, factor 2 (20.8%) described sausages with more meat in the formulation, and factor 3 (20.6%) longer or rapid fermentation. Overall, the results evidenced the great variability in the quality attributes of Portuguese chorizo sausages, very likely to arise from multiple recipes, ingredients, and manufacturing practices. The definition of quality clusters is expected to play a crucial role for the self-denominated \"artisanal\" food companies to benchmark their <i>chouriço</i> sausages against the proper artisanal quality group.</p>","PeriodicalId":12386,"journal":{"name":"Foods","volume":"13 22","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foods","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13223705","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The physicochemical and microbiological properties of traditional Portuguese ready-to-eat dry fermented sausage chouriça de carne samples from 14 regional producers were analysed and subjected to multivariate analysis to determine the relationships between them and to evaluate how the quality and safety of these sausages is affected by these properties. Producer-mean values for physicochemical analyses were quite variable, with intervals of 4.87-6.11 for pH, 0.803-0.965 for aw, moisture 19.5-48.5%, protein 32.0-60.1% (db), fat 22.0-53.3% (db), ash 3.52-9.69% (db), and carbohydrates 1.66-13.5% (db). Mesophilic counts varied (5.61-8.68 log CFU/g), while lactic acid bacteria were generally high (MRS: 8.21-10.2; M17: 7.66-10.0 log CFU/g). S. aureus was enumerated in levels up to 2.55 log CFU/g, while presumptive C. perfringens never surpassed 2 log CFU/g. Salmonella spp. and Listeria spp. were also detected in the samples tested. Principal component (PC) analysis yielded a three-dimension solution that explained 60% of the data variation; PC1 (26%) characterized chorizo formulations with more meat, while PC2 (19.3%) described sausages with longer/rapid fermentation, and PC3 (14.5%) highlighted chouriços with poorer hygiene. Cluster analysis identified three quality groups: (i) chorizos with high moisture, high protein content, and lowest pH; (ii) sausages with low moisture, high fat content, and elevated pH; and (iii) chouriças with high moisture and high protein but lower fat contents, low pH, and improved hygiene. Lastly, factor analysis yielded a varimax-rotated three-factor solution that explained 65% of the data, with similar results to PCA; factor 1 (23.5%) depicted chorizos with low pH but high moisture, factor 2 (20.8%) described sausages with more meat in the formulation, and factor 3 (20.6%) longer or rapid fermentation. Overall, the results evidenced the great variability in the quality attributes of Portuguese chorizo sausages, very likely to arise from multiple recipes, ingredients, and manufacturing practices. The definition of quality clusters is expected to play a crucial role for the self-denominated "artisanal" food companies to benchmark their chouriço sausages against the proper artisanal quality group.

传统制作的 Chouriça de Carne 干发酵香肠的微生物和理化概况:根据既定质量组别确定产品基准。
对来自 14 个地区生产商的葡萄牙传统即食干发酵香肠 Chouriça de carne 样品的理化和微生物特性进行了分析,并对其进行了多元分析,以确定它们之间的关系,并评估这些特性如何影响这些香肠的质量和安全。理化分析的生产商平均值变化很大,pH 值为 4.87-6.11,aw 值为 0.803-0.965,水分为 19.5-48.5%,蛋白质为 32.0-60.1%(db),脂肪为 22.0-53.3%(db),灰分为 3.52-9.69%(db),碳水化合物为 1.66-13.5%(db)。嗜中性细菌数量不等(5.61-8.68 log CFU/g),而乳酸菌数量普遍较高(MRS:8.21-10.2;M17:7.66-10.0 log CFU/g)。金黄色葡萄球菌的含量高达 2.55 log CFU/g,而假定的产气荚膜杆菌含量从未超过 2 log CFU/g。在检测的样品中还检测到了沙门氏菌属和李斯特菌属。主成分(PC)分析得出了一个三维解决方案,解释了 60% 的数据变化;PC1(26%)描述了肉类较多的辣香肠配方,PC2(19.3%)描述了发酵时间较长/较快的香肠,PC3(14.5%)强调了卫生条件较差的辣香肠。聚类分析确定了三个质量组:(i) 水分高、蛋白质含量高、pH 值最低的辣香肠;(ii) 水分低、脂肪含量高、pH 值升高的香肠;(iii) 水分高、蛋白质含量高但脂肪含量低、pH 值低、卫生条件较好的辣香肠。最后,因子分析得出了一个变异旋转的三因子解决方案,解释了 65% 的数据,结果与 PCA 相似;因子 1(23.5%)描述了 pH 值低但水分高的辣香肠,因子 2(20.8%)描述了配方中含有更多肉类的香肠,因子 3(20.6%)描述了更长或更快的发酵过程。总之,研究结果表明,葡萄牙辣香肠的质量属性差异很大,这很可能是多种配方、配料和生产方法造成的。对于自称 "手工 "的食品公司来说,质量群组的定义预计将发挥关键作用,使他们能够以适当的手工质量群组为基准来衡量自己的辣香肠。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Foods
Foods Immunology and Microbiology-Microbiology
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
15.40%
发文量
3516
审稿时长
15.83 days
期刊介绍: Foods (ISSN 2304-8158) is an international, peer-reviewed scientific open access journal which provides an advanced forum for studies related to all aspects of food research. It publishes reviews, regular research papers and short communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists, researchers, and other food professionals to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible or share their knowledge with as much readers unlimitedly as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. There are, in addition, unique features of this journal: Ÿ manuscripts regarding research proposals and research ideas will be particularly welcomed Ÿ electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculation and experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material Ÿ we also accept manuscripts communicating to a broader audience with regard to research projects financed with public funds
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信