Evidential Analysis: An Alternative to Hypothesis Testing in Normal Linear Models.

IF 2.1 3区 物理与天体物理 Q2 PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Entropy Pub Date : 2024-11-10 DOI:10.3390/e26110964
Brian Dennis, Mark L Taper, José M Ponciano
{"title":"Evidential Analysis: An Alternative to Hypothesis Testing in Normal Linear Models.","authors":"Brian Dennis, Mark L Taper, José M Ponciano","doi":"10.3390/e26110964","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Statistical hypothesis testing, as formalized by 20th century statisticians and taught in college statistics courses, has been a cornerstone of 100 years of scientific progress. Nevertheless, the methodology is increasingly questioned in many scientific disciplines. We demonstrate in this paper how many of the worrisome aspects of statistical hypothesis testing can be ameliorated with concepts and methods from evidential analysis. The model family we treat is the familiar normal linear model with fixed effects, embracing multiple regression and analysis of variance, a warhorse of everyday science in labs and field stations. Questions about study design, the applicability of the null hypothesis, the effect size, error probabilities, evidence strength, and model misspecification become more naturally housed in an evidential setting. We provide a completely worked example featuring a two-way analysis of variance.</p>","PeriodicalId":11694,"journal":{"name":"Entropy","volume":"26 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11592954/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Entropy","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/e26110964","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Statistical hypothesis testing, as formalized by 20th century statisticians and taught in college statistics courses, has been a cornerstone of 100 years of scientific progress. Nevertheless, the methodology is increasingly questioned in many scientific disciplines. We demonstrate in this paper how many of the worrisome aspects of statistical hypothesis testing can be ameliorated with concepts and methods from evidential analysis. The model family we treat is the familiar normal linear model with fixed effects, embracing multiple regression and analysis of variance, a warhorse of everyday science in labs and field stations. Questions about study design, the applicability of the null hypothesis, the effect size, error probabilities, evidence strength, and model misspecification become more naturally housed in an evidential setting. We provide a completely worked example featuring a two-way analysis of variance.

证据分析:正态线性模型假设检验的替代方法。
由 20 世纪统计学家正式提出并在大学统计课程中教授的统计假设检验,是 100 年来科学进步的基石。然而,这种方法在许多科学学科中受到越来越多的质疑。我们在本文中展示了如何利用证据分析的概念和方法来改善统计假设检验的许多令人担忧的方面。我们所处理的模型族是我们熟悉的具有固定效应的正态线性模型,包含多元回归和方差分析,是实验室和野外台站日常科学的主战场。有关研究设计、零假设的适用性、效应大小、误差概率、证据强度和模型失当的问题,都可以更自然地安置在实证环境中。我们提供了一个以双向方差分析为特色的完整示例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Entropy
Entropy PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
1580
审稿时长
21.05 days
期刊介绍: Entropy (ISSN 1099-4300), an international and interdisciplinary journal of entropy and information studies, publishes reviews, regular research papers and short notes. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish as much as possible their theoretical and experimental details. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. If there are computation and the experiment, the details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信