Assessing scleral thickness in patients with POAG and myopia by using OCT.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Asadullah Jatoi
{"title":"Assessing scleral thickness in patients with POAG and myopia by using OCT.","authors":"Asadullah Jatoi","doi":"10.1177/11206721241302115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of the study is to utilize swept-source OCT for imaging the rear sclera near the ONH, calculating the thickness of the SL and lamina, and examining how these measurements correspond to various metrics.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional design with a prospective approach.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study included 96 glaucoma patients and 39 control subjects, all with axial lengths greater than 23 mm. Swept-source OCT was used to visualize the subfoveal and ONH regions. Thicknesses of SL and lamina were then calculated from the \"B-scan\" visuals collected. In order to confirm the consistency of the calculation, \"intraclass correlation coefficients\" were computed from specific \"B-scans\". The study compared the thickness of the SL and lamina in subjects with NTG to those with POAG. A \"Pearson correlation\" was conducted to analyze the connections between the thickness of the SL and lamina with various ocular parameters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Swept-source OCT enabled the measurement of posterior SL thickness in 65.9% and laminar thickness in 89.8% of the subjects. The consistency of measurements taken by different observers and by the same observer varied from moderate to excellent. There was a notable variation among the NTG and POAG sets in terms of subfoveal SL thickness, with measurements of 680.84 ± 170.60 mm and 486.55 ± 125.21 mm, respectively. The connection among subfoveal SL thickness and axial-length was discovered to be negative in subjects with NTG, but this was not observed in subjects with POAG. The variation in connection among the 2 subject groups was statistically important (r [ L0.687, P < 0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>\"Swept-source OCT\" identified variations in posterior SL thickness between NTG and POAG eyes. The subfoveal scleral thickness showed a negative association with axial-length, particularly in eyes with normal-tension glaucoma.</p>","PeriodicalId":12000,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":"11206721241302115"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11206721241302115","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The aim of the study is to utilize swept-source OCT for imaging the rear sclera near the ONH, calculating the thickness of the SL and lamina, and examining how these measurements correspond to various metrics.

Design: Cross-sectional design with a prospective approach.

Materials and methods: The study included 96 glaucoma patients and 39 control subjects, all with axial lengths greater than 23 mm. Swept-source OCT was used to visualize the subfoveal and ONH regions. Thicknesses of SL and lamina were then calculated from the "B-scan" visuals collected. In order to confirm the consistency of the calculation, "intraclass correlation coefficients" were computed from specific "B-scans". The study compared the thickness of the SL and lamina in subjects with NTG to those with POAG. A "Pearson correlation" was conducted to analyze the connections between the thickness of the SL and lamina with various ocular parameters.

Results: Swept-source OCT enabled the measurement of posterior SL thickness in 65.9% and laminar thickness in 89.8% of the subjects. The consistency of measurements taken by different observers and by the same observer varied from moderate to excellent. There was a notable variation among the NTG and POAG sets in terms of subfoveal SL thickness, with measurements of 680.84 ± 170.60 mm and 486.55 ± 125.21 mm, respectively. The connection among subfoveal SL thickness and axial-length was discovered to be negative in subjects with NTG, but this was not observed in subjects with POAG. The variation in connection among the 2 subject groups was statistically important (r [ L0.687, P < 0.002).

Conclusions: "Swept-source OCT" identified variations in posterior SL thickness between NTG and POAG eyes. The subfoveal scleral thickness showed a negative association with axial-length, particularly in eyes with normal-tension glaucoma.

使用 OCT 评估 POAG 和近视患者的巩膜厚度。
背景:该研究旨在利用扫源OCT对ONH附近的后巩膜进行成像,计算SL和薄层的厚度,并研究这些测量值与各种指标的对应关系:设计:前瞻性横断面设计:研究对象包括 96 名青光眼患者和 39 名对照组受试者,他们的轴长都大于 23 毫米。采用扫源 OCT 观察眼底和 ONH 区域。然后根据收集到的 "B扫描 "图像计算SL和板层的厚度。为了确认计算的一致性,根据特定的 "B 扫描 "计算了 "类内相关系数"。研究比较了 NTG 患者与 POAG 患者的 SL 和薄层厚度。研究还进行了 "皮尔逊相关性 "分析,以分析SL和薄层厚度与各种眼部参数之间的联系:扫源 OCT 能够测量 65.9% 的受试者的后 SL 厚度和 89.8% 的板层厚度。不同观察者和同一观察者测量结果的一致性从中等到优秀不等。NTG 和 POAG 组的眼底 SL 厚度差异显著,测量值分别为 680.84 ± 170.60 毫米和 486.55 ± 125.21 毫米。在 NTG 受试者中,发现视网膜下 SL 厚度与轴向长度之间的联系为负相关,但在 POAG 受试者中却没有观察到这种联系。两组受试者之间的联系差异具有统计学意义(r [ L0.687,P 结论):"扫源 OCT "确定了 NTG 和 POAG 眼睛后部 SL 厚度的差异。眼底巩膜厚度与轴长呈负相关,尤其是在正常张力青光眼患者中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
372
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Ophthalmology was founded in 1991 and is issued in print bi-monthly. It publishes only peer-reviewed original research reporting clinical observations and laboratory investigations with clinical relevance focusing on new diagnostic and surgical techniques, instrument and therapy updates, results of clinical trials and research findings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信