Comparing ultrasound-guided intra-articular injection and medial branch block for lumbar facet joint pain: a clinical study.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Hui Zhao, Yun-Long Hou, Le-Hang Guo, Qiao Wang, Tian He, Guang-Fei Gu, Li-Ping Sun, Feng-Shan Jin
{"title":"Comparing ultrasound-guided intra-articular injection and medial branch block for lumbar facet joint pain: a clinical study.","authors":"Hui Zhao, Yun-Long Hou, Le-Hang Guo, Qiao Wang, Tian He, Guang-Fei Gu, Li-Ping Sun, Feng-Shan Jin","doi":"10.4274/dir.2024.242765","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aims to compare the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided intra-articular (IA) injections with medial branch nerve blocks in treating lumbar facet joint pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study enrolled 94 patients clinically diagnosed with lumbar facet joint pain. Diagnostic blocks confirmed the diagnosis in 82 patients, evidenced by a pain visual analog score (VAS) reduction of at least 50% immediately following the injection. Of these, 42 were treated with ultrasound-guided IA injections (group 1), and 40 received ultrasound-guided medial branch blocks (group 2). Effective pain relief was defined as a VAS reduction of at least 50%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Group 1 showed significantly higher pain relief rates compared with group 2 at both 1-month (54.76% versus 2.5%, <i>P</i> < 0.001) and 3-month (26.19% versus 5%, <i>P</i> = 0.014) follow-ups. Within group 1, patients aged 21-50 years experienced higher relief rates (81.25% at 1-month and 56.25% at 3-month follow-ups) compared with those over 50 (38.46% at 1-month and 7.69% at 3-month follow-ups), which was statistically significant (<i>P</i> = 0.007 at 1-month and <i>P</i> = 0.001 at 3-month follow-ups). Furthermore, in group 1, patients with sedentary jobs reported significantly greater pain relief (90.91% at 1-month and 81.82% at 3-month follow-ups) compared with those with non-sedentary jobs (41.94% at 1-month and 6.45% at 3-month follow-ups) (<i>P</i> = 0.005 at 1-month and <i>P</i> < 0.001 at 3-month follow-ups).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ultrasound-guided IA injection provides better pain relief compared with medial branch nerve blocks. This method serves as a viable alternative for patients, especially younger and middle-aged patients with lumbar facet pain due to sedentary lifestyles.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>This study compared and analyzed the therapeutic effects of two different ultrasound intervention blockade methods on patients with lumbar facet joint pain, demonstrating that IA injection has a better pain relief effect and can be used as a pain relief method for patients who refuse radiofrequency therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":11341,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic and interventional radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostic and interventional radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/dir.2024.242765","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to compare the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided intra-articular (IA) injections with medial branch nerve blocks in treating lumbar facet joint pain.

Methods: This retrospective study enrolled 94 patients clinically diagnosed with lumbar facet joint pain. Diagnostic blocks confirmed the diagnosis in 82 patients, evidenced by a pain visual analog score (VAS) reduction of at least 50% immediately following the injection. Of these, 42 were treated with ultrasound-guided IA injections (group 1), and 40 received ultrasound-guided medial branch blocks (group 2). Effective pain relief was defined as a VAS reduction of at least 50%.

Results: Group 1 showed significantly higher pain relief rates compared with group 2 at both 1-month (54.76% versus 2.5%, P < 0.001) and 3-month (26.19% versus 5%, P = 0.014) follow-ups. Within group 1, patients aged 21-50 years experienced higher relief rates (81.25% at 1-month and 56.25% at 3-month follow-ups) compared with those over 50 (38.46% at 1-month and 7.69% at 3-month follow-ups), which was statistically significant (P = 0.007 at 1-month and P = 0.001 at 3-month follow-ups). Furthermore, in group 1, patients with sedentary jobs reported significantly greater pain relief (90.91% at 1-month and 81.82% at 3-month follow-ups) compared with those with non-sedentary jobs (41.94% at 1-month and 6.45% at 3-month follow-ups) (P = 0.005 at 1-month and P < 0.001 at 3-month follow-ups).

Conclusion: Ultrasound-guided IA injection provides better pain relief compared with medial branch nerve blocks. This method serves as a viable alternative for patients, especially younger and middle-aged patients with lumbar facet pain due to sedentary lifestyles.

Clinical significance: This study compared and analyzed the therapeutic effects of two different ultrasound intervention blockade methods on patients with lumbar facet joint pain, demonstrating that IA injection has a better pain relief effect and can be used as a pain relief method for patients who refuse radiofrequency therapy.

比较超声引导下关节内注射和内侧支阻滞治疗腰椎面关节疼痛:一项临床研究。
目的:本研究旨在比较超声引导下关节内(IA)注射与内侧支神经阻滞治疗腰椎面关节疼痛的效果:这项回顾性研究共纳入94名临床诊断为腰椎面关节痛的患者。82名患者的诊断性阻滞确诊,证明是注射后疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)立即减轻至少50%。其中,42 人接受了超声引导下的 IA 注射治疗(第 1 组),40 人接受了超声引导下的内侧支阻滞治疗(第 2 组)。有效缓解疼痛的定义是 VAS 值至少减少 50%:在 1 个月(54.76% 对 2.5%,P < 0.001)和 3 个月(26.19% 对 5%,P = 0.014)的随访中,第一组的疼痛缓解率明显高于第二组。在第 1 组中,21-50 岁患者的缓解率(1 个月时为 81.25%,3 个月随访时为 56.25%)高于 50 岁以上患者(1 个月时为 38.46%,3 个月随访时为 7.69%),差异有统计学意义(1 个月随访时 P = 0.007,3 个月随访时 P = 0.001)。此外,在第一组中,从事久坐工作的患者的疼痛缓解率(1 个月时为 90.91%,3 个月随访时为 81.82%)明显高于非久坐工作的患者(1 个月时为 41.94%,3 个月随访时为 6.45%)(1 个月时的 P = 0.005,3 个月随访时的 P <0.001):结论:与内侧支神经阻滞相比,超声引导下的 IA 注射能更好地缓解疼痛。临床意义:本研究比较分析了两种不同的超声介入阻滞方法对腰椎面关节疼痛患者的治疗效果,结果表明,IA 注射具有更好的止痛效果,可作为拒绝射频治疗的患者的止痛方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diagnostic and interventional radiology
Diagnostic and interventional radiology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
自引率
4.80%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (Diagn Interv Radiol) is the open access, online-only official publication of Turkish Society of Radiology. It is published bimonthly and the journal’s publication language is English. The journal is a medium for original articles, reviews, pictorial essays, technical notes related to all fields of diagnostic and interventional radiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信