The Utility of Pre-Procedural Blood Tests in Neuraxial Blocks: A Retrospective Study in High-Risk Patients.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Sungho Moon, Daeseok Oh
{"title":"The Utility of Pre-Procedural Blood Tests in Neuraxial Blocks: A Retrospective Study in High-Risk Patients.","authors":"Sungho Moon, Daeseok Oh","doi":"10.3390/diagnostics14222588","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: The necessity and clinical utility of routine pre-procedural blood tests (PBTs) before neuraxial blockade remain controversial. This study evaluates the effectiveness of PBTs in identifying clinically significant conditions in an outpatient setting. <b>Methods</b>: This single-center retrospective study involved patients who received neuraxial blockades from January 2020 to August 2023. We extracted medical information and laboratory data from the electronic medical records during the pre-procedural period. Through a multivariate regression analysis, we identified patient factors associated with abnormal laboratory results. <b>Results</b>: Advanced age (OR, 1.021; <i>p</i> = 0.026) and a history of cancer (OR, 2.359; <i>p</i> = 0.016) were significantly associated with elevated CRP levels (>0.30 mg/dL). Severe hyperglycemia (≥200 mg/dL) was found in 24 patients (3.88%), with a history of cancer being a strong predictor (OR, 6.764; <i>p</i> < 0.001). No significant abnormalities were observed in PT or PTT. Reduced eGFR (<60 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>) was detected in 8.62% of patients, despite no prior history of renal dysfunction. A multivariate analysis revealed that advanced age, hypertension, cancer, and coronary artery disease were significant predictors of abnormal PBT results, highlighting the importance of selective testing in high-risk patients. <b>Conclusions</b>: Routine PBTs are not universally required for all patients undergoing neuraxial blockade but can provide crucial information in high-risk populations. A selective testing approach based on individual risk factors is recommended to optimize patient safety and resource utilization. Future studies should aim to establish clear guidelines for targeted PBT use.</p>","PeriodicalId":11225,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostics","volume":"14 22","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11592636/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14222588","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: The necessity and clinical utility of routine pre-procedural blood tests (PBTs) before neuraxial blockade remain controversial. This study evaluates the effectiveness of PBTs in identifying clinically significant conditions in an outpatient setting. Methods: This single-center retrospective study involved patients who received neuraxial blockades from January 2020 to August 2023. We extracted medical information and laboratory data from the electronic medical records during the pre-procedural period. Through a multivariate regression analysis, we identified patient factors associated with abnormal laboratory results. Results: Advanced age (OR, 1.021; p = 0.026) and a history of cancer (OR, 2.359; p = 0.016) were significantly associated with elevated CRP levels (>0.30 mg/dL). Severe hyperglycemia (≥200 mg/dL) was found in 24 patients (3.88%), with a history of cancer being a strong predictor (OR, 6.764; p < 0.001). No significant abnormalities were observed in PT or PTT. Reduced eGFR (<60 mL/min/1.73 m2) was detected in 8.62% of patients, despite no prior history of renal dysfunction. A multivariate analysis revealed that advanced age, hypertension, cancer, and coronary artery disease were significant predictors of abnormal PBT results, highlighting the importance of selective testing in high-risk patients. Conclusions: Routine PBTs are not universally required for all patients undergoing neuraxial blockade but can provide crucial information in high-risk populations. A selective testing approach based on individual risk factors is recommended to optimize patient safety and resource utilization. Future studies should aim to establish clear guidelines for targeted PBT use.

神经阻滞术前血液检测的效用:高风险患者的回顾性研究。
背景/目的:神经阻滞术前常规血液检查(PBT)的必要性和临床实用性仍存在争议。本研究评估了 PBT 在门诊环境中识别临床重大疾病的有效性。方法:这项单中心回顾性研究涉及 2020 年 1 月至 2023 年 8 月期间接受神经阻滞的患者。我们从电子病历中提取了手术前的医疗信息和实验室数据。通过多变量回归分析,我们确定了与实验室结果异常相关的患者因素。结果显示高龄(OR,1.021;p = 0.026)和癌症病史(OR,2.359;p = 0.016)与 CRP 水平升高(>0.30 mg/dL)显著相关。有 24 名患者(3.88%)出现严重高血糖(≥200 mg/dL),癌症病史是一个很强的预测因素(OR,6.764;p <0.001)。PT 或 PTT 未见明显异常。8.62%的患者检测到 eGFR(2)降低,尽管之前没有肾功能障碍病史。多变量分析显示,高龄、高血压、癌症和冠状动脉疾病是预测 PBT 结果异常的重要因素,这凸显了对高危患者进行选择性检测的重要性。结论:并非所有接受神经阻滞的患者都需要进行常规 PBT,但它能为高危人群提供重要信息。建议采用基于个体风险因素的选择性检测方法,以优化患者安全和资源利用。未来的研究应旨在为有针对性地使用 PBT 制定明确的指导方针。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diagnostics
Diagnostics Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Clinical Biochemistry
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
2699
审稿时长
19.64 days
期刊介绍: Diagnostics (ISSN 2075-4418) is an international scholarly open access journal on medical diagnostics. It publishes original research articles, reviews, communications and short notes on the research and development of medical diagnostics. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical research in as much detail as possible. Full experimental and/or methodological details must be provided for research articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信