Median Meld at Transplant Minus 3 Reduces the Mortality of Non-Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients on the Liver Transplant Waitlist.

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Panthea Pouramin, Susan E Allen, Joseph L Silburt, Boris L Gala-Lopez
{"title":"Median Meld at Transplant Minus 3 Reduces the Mortality of Non-Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients on the Liver Transplant Waitlist.","authors":"Panthea Pouramin, Susan E Allen, Joseph L Silburt, Boris L Gala-Lopez","doi":"10.3390/curroncol31110519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Liver transplants (LTs) are prioritized by mortality risk, which is estimated by MELD scores. Since hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients present with lower MELD scores, they are allocated MELD exception points. Concerns persist that HCC recipients are over-prioritized, resulting in disproportionate waitlist mortality among non-HCC patients. We assessed whether the Median Meld at Transplant minus 3 (MMaT-3) scoring system would balance waitlist mortality and transplantation rates between HCC and non-HCC patients. We reviewed 266 patient charts listed for an LT from 2015 to 2023; 46.2% were listed in the MMaT-3 era. Amongst non-HCC patients, MMaT-3 implementation significantly increased 1-year transplant rate and reduced 1-year waitlist mortality among non-HCC patients (<i>p</i> = 0.003). Pre-MMaT-3 gaps in transplantation (<i>p</i> = 0.004) and waitlist dropout (<i>p</i> = 0.01) were eliminated post-implementation (<i>p</i> > 0.05). Amongst HCC patients, MMaT-3 implementation had no impact on the 1-year transplant rate (<i>p</i> = 0.92) or 1-year waitlist mortality (<i>p</i> = 0.66). Fine-gray proportional hazard multivariable analysis revealed that MMaT-3 significantly reduced waitlist mortality among non-HCC patients (asHR: 0.44, 95% CI [0.23, 0.83], <i>p</i> = 0.01) and limited impact on HCC patients (<i>p</i> = 0.31). MMaT-3 allocation did not significantly alter 2-year post-transplant survival for both populations. We show that the MMaT-3 system decreased the waitlist mortality of non-HCC patients with limited impacts on outcomes for HCC patients listed for an LT.</p>","PeriodicalId":11012,"journal":{"name":"Current oncology","volume":"31 11","pages":"7051-7060"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11592907/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol31110519","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Liver transplants (LTs) are prioritized by mortality risk, which is estimated by MELD scores. Since hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients present with lower MELD scores, they are allocated MELD exception points. Concerns persist that HCC recipients are over-prioritized, resulting in disproportionate waitlist mortality among non-HCC patients. We assessed whether the Median Meld at Transplant minus 3 (MMaT-3) scoring system would balance waitlist mortality and transplantation rates between HCC and non-HCC patients. We reviewed 266 patient charts listed for an LT from 2015 to 2023; 46.2% were listed in the MMaT-3 era. Amongst non-HCC patients, MMaT-3 implementation significantly increased 1-year transplant rate and reduced 1-year waitlist mortality among non-HCC patients (p = 0.003). Pre-MMaT-3 gaps in transplantation (p = 0.004) and waitlist dropout (p = 0.01) were eliminated post-implementation (p > 0.05). Amongst HCC patients, MMaT-3 implementation had no impact on the 1-year transplant rate (p = 0.92) or 1-year waitlist mortality (p = 0.66). Fine-gray proportional hazard multivariable analysis revealed that MMaT-3 significantly reduced waitlist mortality among non-HCC patients (asHR: 0.44, 95% CI [0.23, 0.83], p = 0.01) and limited impact on HCC patients (p = 0.31). MMaT-3 allocation did not significantly alter 2-year post-transplant survival for both populations. We show that the MMaT-3 system decreased the waitlist mortality of non-HCC patients with limited impacts on outcomes for HCC patients listed for an LT.

移植中位数减3可降低肝移植候选名单上非肝细胞癌患者的死亡率。
肝脏移植(LT)的优先顺序取决于死亡率风险,而死亡率风险是根据 MELD 评分估算的。由于肝细胞癌(HCC)患者的 MELD 评分较低,因此他们被分配到 MELD 例外点。人们一直担心,HCC 患者的优先级过高,导致非 HCC 患者的候诊死亡率不成比例。我们评估了移植中位数减 3(MMaT-3)评分系统是否能平衡 HCC 和非 HCC 患者的候诊死亡率和移植率。我们回顾了 2015 年至 2023 年期间列入 LT 的 266 份患者病历,其中 46.2% 在 MMaT-3 时代列入。在非 HCC 患者中,MMaT-3 的实施显著提高了非 HCC 患者的 1 年移植率,降低了 1 年等待死亡率(p = 0.003)。实施 MMaT-3 前的移植差距(p = 0.004)和候选名单退出差距(p = 0.01)在实施 MMaT-3 后被消除(p > 0.05)。在 HCC 患者中,MMaT-3 的实施对 1 年移植率(p = 0.92)或 1 年等待名单死亡率(p = 0.66)没有影响。细灰比例危险多变量分析显示,MMaT-3 能显著降低非 HCC 患者的候诊死亡率(asHR:0.44,95% CI [0.23,0.83],p = 0.01),对 HCC 患者的影响有限(p = 0.31)。MMaT-3的分配并不会明显改变两种人群移植后2年的存活率。我们的研究表明,MMaT-3 系统降低了非 HCC 患者的候诊死亡率,但对 HCC 患者的治疗效果影响有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current oncology
Current oncology ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
664
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Current Oncology is a peer-reviewed, Canadian-based and internationally respected journal. Current Oncology represents a multidisciplinary medium encompassing health care workers in the field of cancer therapy in Canada to report upon and to review progress in the management of this disease. We encourage submissions from all fields of cancer medicine, including radiation oncology, surgical oncology, medical oncology, pediatric oncology, pathology, and cancer rehabilitation and survivorship. Articles published in the journal typically contain information that is relevant directly to clinical oncology practice, and have clear potential for application to the current or future practice of cancer medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信