Trabectedin for L-Type Sarcoma: A Retrospective Multicenter Study.

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Sercan Ön, Barış Köksal, Zafer Arık, Burcu Caner, Duygu Ercan Uzundal, Ozan Yazıcı, Burcu Arslan Benli, Eda Eylemer Mocan, Can Güngör, Zeynep Gülsüm Güç, Seval Akay, Merve Keskinkılıç, Hande Dik Avcı, Burçak Karaca Yayla, Burcu Çakar, Ulus Ali Şanlı
{"title":"Trabectedin for L-Type Sarcoma: A Retrospective Multicenter Study.","authors":"Sercan Ön, Barış Köksal, Zafer Arık, Burcu Caner, Duygu Ercan Uzundal, Ozan Yazıcı, Burcu Arslan Benli, Eda Eylemer Mocan, Can Güngör, Zeynep Gülsüm Güç, Seval Akay, Merve Keskinkılıç, Hande Dik Avcı, Burçak Karaca Yayla, Burcu Çakar, Ulus Ali Şanlı","doi":"10.3390/curroncol31110502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>(1) Background: Metastatic L-type sarcomas (liposarcoma and leiomyosarcoma) are rare and have a poor prognosis. Trabectedin is an effective agent that can be used after anthracyclines. This study was designed to evaluate the real-life effectiveness and safety of trabectedin. (2) Methods: A retrospective multicenter study was conducted on patients who were treated with trabectedin for metastatic L-type sarcomas at ten tertiary oncology centers between 2015 and 2023. The objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), time to treatment failure (TTF), and overall survival (OS) were evaluated in the cohort. Cox regression analysis was used to determine prognostic factors for survival. (3) Results: A total of 98 patients (52% liposarcoma and 48% leiomyosarcoma) were included in the study. The median treatment line was three (range: 1 to 6). Thirteen patients (13.3%) underwent local treatment due to oligoprogression, and dose reduction was required in seventeen patients (17.3%) due to toxicity. The ORR and DCR were 16% and 42%, respectively. The median TTF was 3 months, and the median OS was 10 months. In univariate analysis, a significantly longer median TTF was observed in patients who underwent local treatment (<i>p</i> = 0.008), obtained objective responses (<i>p</i> < 0.001), and underwent dose reduction (<i>p</i> = 0.002). No statistical differences were observed according to the histologic subtype and metastatic site. In the multivariate analysis for OS, it was found that obtaining an objective response was a good prognostic factor (<i>p</i> = 0.003), while the presence of liver metastases was associated with a poor prognosis (<i>p</i> = 0.016). (4) Conclusion: Trabectedin is a suitable option for L-type sarcoma after doxorubicin-based treatments. Survival was not worse in patients who underwent dose reduction. The use of local therapies simultaneously with trabectedin can be effective.</p>","PeriodicalId":11012,"journal":{"name":"Current oncology","volume":"31 11","pages":"6803-6813"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11592548/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol31110502","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

(1) Background: Metastatic L-type sarcomas (liposarcoma and leiomyosarcoma) are rare and have a poor prognosis. Trabectedin is an effective agent that can be used after anthracyclines. This study was designed to evaluate the real-life effectiveness and safety of trabectedin. (2) Methods: A retrospective multicenter study was conducted on patients who were treated with trabectedin for metastatic L-type sarcomas at ten tertiary oncology centers between 2015 and 2023. The objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), time to treatment failure (TTF), and overall survival (OS) were evaluated in the cohort. Cox regression analysis was used to determine prognostic factors for survival. (3) Results: A total of 98 patients (52% liposarcoma and 48% leiomyosarcoma) were included in the study. The median treatment line was three (range: 1 to 6). Thirteen patients (13.3%) underwent local treatment due to oligoprogression, and dose reduction was required in seventeen patients (17.3%) due to toxicity. The ORR and DCR were 16% and 42%, respectively. The median TTF was 3 months, and the median OS was 10 months. In univariate analysis, a significantly longer median TTF was observed in patients who underwent local treatment (p = 0.008), obtained objective responses (p < 0.001), and underwent dose reduction (p = 0.002). No statistical differences were observed according to the histologic subtype and metastatic site. In the multivariate analysis for OS, it was found that obtaining an objective response was a good prognostic factor (p = 0.003), while the presence of liver metastases was associated with a poor prognosis (p = 0.016). (4) Conclusion: Trabectedin is a suitable option for L-type sarcoma after doxorubicin-based treatments. Survival was not worse in patients who underwent dose reduction. The use of local therapies simultaneously with trabectedin can be effective.

曲贝替丁(Trabectedin)治疗 L 型肉瘤:一项回顾性多中心研究
(1) 背景:转移性L型肉瘤(脂肪肉瘤和亮肌肉瘤)非常罕见,预后较差。曲贝替定是一种可在蒽环类药物之后使用的有效药物。本研究旨在评估曲贝替定的实际有效性和安全性。(2)方法:一项回顾性多中心研究针对2015年至2023年间在十家三级肿瘤中心接受过曲贝替定治疗的转移性L型肉瘤患者。对队列中的客观反应率(ORR)、疾病控制率(DCR)、治疗失败时间(TTF)和总生存期(OS)进行了评估。Cox回归分析用于确定生存率的预后因素。(3)结果:研究共纳入98名患者(52%为脂肪肉瘤,48%为亮肌肉瘤)。中位治疗线为3条(范围:1至6条)。13名患者(13.3%)因少进展而接受局部治疗,17名患者(17.3%)因毒性而需要减少剂量。ORR和DCR分别为16%和42%。中位TTF为3个月,中位OS为10个月。在单变量分析中,接受局部治疗(p = 0.008)、获得客观反应(p < 0.001)和减量(p = 0.002)的患者的中位TTF明显更长。组织学亚型和转移部位没有统计学差异。在对 OS 进行多变量分析时发现,获得客观反应是一个良好的预后因素(p = 0.003),而肝转移的存在与不良预后相关(p = 0.016)。(4) 结论:曲贝替定是多柔比星治疗后 L 型肉瘤的合适选择。接受减量治疗的患者生存率并没有降低。在使用曲贝替定的同时使用局部疗法可能有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current oncology
Current oncology ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
664
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Current Oncology is a peer-reviewed, Canadian-based and internationally respected journal. Current Oncology represents a multidisciplinary medium encompassing health care workers in the field of cancer therapy in Canada to report upon and to review progress in the management of this disease. We encourage submissions from all fields of cancer medicine, including radiation oncology, surgical oncology, medical oncology, pediatric oncology, pathology, and cancer rehabilitation and survivorship. Articles published in the journal typically contain information that is relevant directly to clinical oncology practice, and have clear potential for application to the current or future practice of cancer medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信