Time to Next Treatment Following Sub-Ablative Progression Directed Radiation Therapy for Oligoprogressive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Riccardo Ray Colciago, Chiara Chissotti, Federica Ferrario, Maria Belmonte, Giorgio Purrello, Valeria Faccenda, Denis Panizza, Stefania Canova, Gaia Passarella, Diego Luigi Cortinovis, Stefano Arcangeli
{"title":"Time to Next Treatment Following Sub-Ablative Progression Directed Radiation Therapy for Oligoprogressive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.","authors":"Riccardo Ray Colciago, Chiara Chissotti, Federica Ferrario, Maria Belmonte, Giorgio Purrello, Valeria Faccenda, Denis Panizza, Stefania Canova, Gaia Passarella, Diego Luigi Cortinovis, Stefano Arcangeli","doi":"10.3390/curroncol31110505","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We aimed to evaluate whether progression-directed radiation therapy (PDRT) can prolong the initiation of a subsequent systemic therapy regimen in a cohort of patients with oligoprogressive NSCLC. A retrospective analysis was conducted on NSCLC patients who underwent PDRT for extracranial oligoprogressive NSCLC, defined as limited (up to five) progressing lesions following initial complete, partial, or stable response to systemic therapy according to REC1ST 1.1 and/or PERCIST 1.0 criteria. Cox proportional hazard regressions were performed to identify factors influencing time to next treatment (TTNT), which was considered the primary endpoint. Forty patients were analyzed. First, second, and ≥3 lines of systemic therapy were administered in 22 (58.2%), 14 (27.2%), and 4 (14.6%) cases, respectively. The median total dose was 36 Gy (range: 12-60) in five fractions (1-10), with a median biological effective dose for tumor control (BED10) of 52 Gy (26.4-151.2). After a median follow-up of 11 months (2-50), PDRT delayed further systemic therapy in 32 (80.0%) treatments. Median TTNT was not reached at 8 months (1-47) with a one-year Kaplan-Meier estimate of 81.4% (95% CI: 75.0% to 87.8%). No >grade 3 adverse event was observed. On multivariate analysis, patients with ≥3 lines of systemic therapy and/or with larger CTV volumes did not benefit from PDRT. Despite the use of sub-ablative doses, our findings show that PDRT represents an effective, safe, and viable option for oligoprogressive NSCLC. Patients irradiated early during their systemic treatment course, with a low volume of disease and nonmetastatic oligoprogression, could derive substantial benefits from PDRT.</p>","PeriodicalId":11012,"journal":{"name":"Current oncology","volume":"31 11","pages":"6840-6852"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11592685/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol31110505","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We aimed to evaluate whether progression-directed radiation therapy (PDRT) can prolong the initiation of a subsequent systemic therapy regimen in a cohort of patients with oligoprogressive NSCLC. A retrospective analysis was conducted on NSCLC patients who underwent PDRT for extracranial oligoprogressive NSCLC, defined as limited (up to five) progressing lesions following initial complete, partial, or stable response to systemic therapy according to REC1ST 1.1 and/or PERCIST 1.0 criteria. Cox proportional hazard regressions were performed to identify factors influencing time to next treatment (TTNT), which was considered the primary endpoint. Forty patients were analyzed. First, second, and ≥3 lines of systemic therapy were administered in 22 (58.2%), 14 (27.2%), and 4 (14.6%) cases, respectively. The median total dose was 36 Gy (range: 12-60) in five fractions (1-10), with a median biological effective dose for tumor control (BED10) of 52 Gy (26.4-151.2). After a median follow-up of 11 months (2-50), PDRT delayed further systemic therapy in 32 (80.0%) treatments. Median TTNT was not reached at 8 months (1-47) with a one-year Kaplan-Meier estimate of 81.4% (95% CI: 75.0% to 87.8%). No >grade 3 adverse event was observed. On multivariate analysis, patients with ≥3 lines of systemic therapy and/or with larger CTV volumes did not benefit from PDRT. Despite the use of sub-ablative doses, our findings show that PDRT represents an effective, safe, and viable option for oligoprogressive NSCLC. Patients irradiated early during their systemic treatment course, with a low volume of disease and nonmetastatic oligoprogression, could derive substantial benefits from PDRT.

亚烧蚀进展导向放疗治疗寡进展非小细胞肺癌后的下一次治疗时间。
我们的目的是评估进展引导放疗(PDRT)是否能延长寡进展 NSCLC 患者队列中后续系统治疗方案的启动时间。根据 REC1ST 1.1 和/或 PERCIST 1.0 标准,颅外少进展 NSCLC 病变定义为对全身治疗初始完全、部分或稳定应答后出现的有限(最多五个)进展病变。研究人员进行了Cox比例危险回归,以确定影响下次治疗时间(TTNT)的因素,这被视为主要终点。对 40 名患者进行了分析。分别有22例(58.2%)、14例(27.2%)和4例(14.6%)患者接受了第一、第二和≥3次系统治疗。中位总剂量为36 Gy(范围:12-60),分5次(1-10)进行,肿瘤控制的中位生物有效剂量(BED10)为52 Gy(26.4-151.2)。经过中位 11 个月(2-50 个月)的随访,有 32 次(80.0%)PDRT 治疗推迟了进一步的全身治疗。中位 TTNT 在 8 个月(1-47 个月)时未达到,一年的 Kaplan-Meier 估计值为 81.4%(95% CI:75.0% 至 87.8%)。未观察到大于 3 级的不良事件。多变量分析显示,接受过≥3次系统治疗和/或CTV体积较大的患者并未从PDRT中获益。尽管使用了亚烧蚀剂量,但我们的研究结果表明,PDRT是治疗少进展NSCLC的一种有效、安全、可行的选择。在全身治疗过程中接受早期照射、病灶体积较小且非转移性寡进展的患者可从 PDRT 中获益匪浅。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current oncology
Current oncology ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
664
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Current Oncology is a peer-reviewed, Canadian-based and internationally respected journal. Current Oncology represents a multidisciplinary medium encompassing health care workers in the field of cancer therapy in Canada to report upon and to review progress in the management of this disease. We encourage submissions from all fields of cancer medicine, including radiation oncology, surgical oncology, medical oncology, pediatric oncology, pathology, and cancer rehabilitation and survivorship. Articles published in the journal typically contain information that is relevant directly to clinical oncology practice, and have clear potential for application to the current or future practice of cancer medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信