Four-Dimensional Flow MRI for Cardiovascular Evaluation (4DCarE): A Prospective Non-Inferiority Study of a Rapid Cardiac MRI Exam: Study Protocol and Pilot Analysis.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Jiaxing Jason Qin, Mustafa Gok, Alireza Gholipour, Jordan LoPilato, Max Kirkby, Christopher Poole, Paul Smith, Rominder Grover, Stuart M Grieve
{"title":"Four-Dimensional Flow MRI for Cardiovascular Evaluation (4DCarE): A Prospective Non-Inferiority Study of a Rapid Cardiac MRI Exam: Study Protocol and Pilot Analysis.","authors":"Jiaxing Jason Qin, Mustafa Gok, Alireza Gholipour, Jordan LoPilato, Max Kirkby, Christopher Poole, Paul Smith, Rominder Grover, Stuart M Grieve","doi":"10.3390/diagnostics14222590","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Accurate measurements of flow and ventricular volume and function are critical for clinical decision-making in cardiovascular medicine. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is the current gold standard for ventricular functional evaluation but is relatively expensive and time-consuming, thus limiting the scale of clinical applications. New volumetric acquisition techniques, such as four-dimensional flow (4D-flow) and three-dimensional volumetric cine (3D-cine) MRI, could potentially reduce acquisition time without loss in accuracy; however, this has not been formally tested on a large scale.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>4DCarE (4D-flow MRI for cardiovascular evaluation) is a prospective, multi-centre study designed to test the non-inferiority of a compressed 20 min exam based on volumetric CMR compared with a conventional CMR exam (45-60 min). The compressed exam utilises 4D-flow together with a single breath-hold 3D-cine to provide a rapid, accurate quantitative assessment of the whole heart function. Outcome measures are (i) flow and chamber volume measurements and (ii) overall functional evaluation. Secondary analyses will explore clinical applications of 4D-flow-derived parameters, including wall shear stress, flow kinetic energy quantification, and vortex analysis in large-scale cohorts. A target of 1200 participants will enter the study across three sites. The analysis will be performed at a single core laboratory site. Pilot Results: We present a pilot analysis of 196 participants comparing flow measurements obtained by 4D-flow and conventional 2D phase contrast, which demonstrated moderate-good consistency in ascending aorta and main pulmonary artery flow measurements between the two techniques. Four-dimensional flow underestimated the flow compared with 2D-PC, by approximately 3 mL/beat in both vessels.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We present the study protocol of a prospective non-inferiority study of a rapid cardiac MRI exam compared with conventional CMR. The pilot analysis supports the continuation of the study.</p><p><strong>Study registration: </strong>This study is registered with the Australia and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (Registry number ACTRN12622000047796, Universal Trial Number: U1111-1270-6509, registered 17 January 2022-Retrospectively registered).</p>","PeriodicalId":11225,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostics","volume":"14 22","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11593203/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14222590","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Accurate measurements of flow and ventricular volume and function are critical for clinical decision-making in cardiovascular medicine. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is the current gold standard for ventricular functional evaluation but is relatively expensive and time-consuming, thus limiting the scale of clinical applications. New volumetric acquisition techniques, such as four-dimensional flow (4D-flow) and three-dimensional volumetric cine (3D-cine) MRI, could potentially reduce acquisition time without loss in accuracy; however, this has not been formally tested on a large scale.

Methods: 4DCarE (4D-flow MRI for cardiovascular evaluation) is a prospective, multi-centre study designed to test the non-inferiority of a compressed 20 min exam based on volumetric CMR compared with a conventional CMR exam (45-60 min). The compressed exam utilises 4D-flow together with a single breath-hold 3D-cine to provide a rapid, accurate quantitative assessment of the whole heart function. Outcome measures are (i) flow and chamber volume measurements and (ii) overall functional evaluation. Secondary analyses will explore clinical applications of 4D-flow-derived parameters, including wall shear stress, flow kinetic energy quantification, and vortex analysis in large-scale cohorts. A target of 1200 participants will enter the study across three sites. The analysis will be performed at a single core laboratory site. Pilot Results: We present a pilot analysis of 196 participants comparing flow measurements obtained by 4D-flow and conventional 2D phase contrast, which demonstrated moderate-good consistency in ascending aorta and main pulmonary artery flow measurements between the two techniques. Four-dimensional flow underestimated the flow compared with 2D-PC, by approximately 3 mL/beat in both vessels.

Conclusions: We present the study protocol of a prospective non-inferiority study of a rapid cardiac MRI exam compared with conventional CMR. The pilot analysis supports the continuation of the study.

Study registration: This study is registered with the Australia and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (Registry number ACTRN12622000047796, Universal Trial Number: U1111-1270-6509, registered 17 January 2022-Retrospectively registered).

用于心血管评估的四维血流 MRI (4DCarE):快速心脏磁共振成像检查的前瞻性非劣效性研究:研究方案和试点分析。
背景:精确测量血流、心室容积和功能对心血管内科的临床决策至关重要。心脏磁共振(CMR)是目前评估心室功能的黄金标准,但相对昂贵且耗时,因此限制了临床应用的规模。方法:4DCarE(用于心血管评估的 4D 流式 MRI)是一项前瞻性多中心研究,旨在测试基于容积式 CMR 的 20 分钟压缩检查与传统 CMR 检查(45-60 分钟)相比是否具有优越性。压缩检查利用 4D 流量和单次屏气 3D cine 对整个心脏功能进行快速、准确的定量评估。结果测量包括:(i) 流量和心腔容积测量;(ii) 整体功能评估。次要分析将探索 4D 流量衍生参数的临床应用,包括大规模队列中的壁剪应力、流动动能量化和涡流分析。三个研究地点将有 1200 名参与者参与研究。分析将在一个核心实验室进行。试验结果:我们对 196 名参与者进行了试验性分析,比较了四维血流和传统二维相位对比所获得的血流测量结果,结果表明两种技术在升主动脉和主肺动脉血流测量结果方面具有中等程度的一致性。与二维相位对比相比,四维血流低估了两支血管的血流,大约低估了 3 毫升/搏动:我们介绍了快速心脏 MRI 检查与传统 CMR 相比非劣效性前瞻性研究的研究方案。试验分析支持继续进行这项研究:本研究已在澳大利亚和新西兰临床试验注册中心注册(注册号:ACTRN12622000047796,通用试验号:U1111-1270-6509):U1111-1270-6509,2022年1月17日注册-回顾注册)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diagnostics
Diagnostics Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Clinical Biochemistry
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
2699
审稿时长
19.64 days
期刊介绍: Diagnostics (ISSN 2075-4418) is an international scholarly open access journal on medical diagnostics. It publishes original research articles, reviews, communications and short notes on the research and development of medical diagnostics. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical research in as much detail as possible. Full experimental and/or methodological details must be provided for research articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信