Transmission risk of vector-borne bacterial diseases (Anaplasma spp. and Ehrlichia canis) in Spain and Portugal.

IF 2.3 2区 农林科学 Q1 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Alfonso Balmori-de la Puente, Iván Rodríguez-Escolar, Manuel Collado-Cuadrado, Elena Infante González-Mohino, María Carmen Vieira Lista, Ricardo Enrique Hernández-Lambraño, José Ángel Sánchez-Agudo, Rodrigo Morchón
{"title":"Transmission risk of vector-borne bacterial diseases (Anaplasma spp. and Ehrlichia canis) in Spain and Portugal.","authors":"Alfonso Balmori-de la Puente, Iván Rodríguez-Escolar, Manuel Collado-Cuadrado, Elena Infante González-Mohino, María Carmen Vieira Lista, Ricardo Enrique Hernández-Lambraño, José Ángel Sánchez-Agudo, Rodrigo Morchón","doi":"10.1186/s12917-024-04383-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis are vector-borne bacterial diseases produced by intracellular rickettsial species of the genus Ehrlichia and Anaplasma. Ehrlichia canis and Anaplasma spp. (A. platys and A. phagocytophilum) have reported cases of zoonotic transmision and are the main bacterial agents of canine ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis. They normally present an asymptomatic or mild course in domestic and wild animals with some lethal cases reported. The main vector of these diseases in Europe are the castor bean tick (Ixodes ricinus) and the brown dog tick (Rhipicephalus sanguineus), although only in the latter, the main host is the domestic dogs. The aim of this work is to apply an integrative approach to convert ecological niche models (ENMs) into potential transmission risk models and understand the relative contribution of the two potential vectors (R. sanguineus and I. ricinus) to spread both diseases in the Iberian Peninsula and Balearic Islands.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two ENMs meeting all criteria were successfully generated for R. sanguineus and I. ricinus with human footprint being the most relevant explanatory variable. The novelty of the study lies in the combination of independent ENMs for both species to estimate the disease transmission risk of specific bacteria (E. canis, A. platys and A. phagocytophilum). Only the transmission risk maps that had higher contribution of R. sanguineus than I. ricinus showed relevant and positive significant correlations between risk and seroprevalence in either of the two species of bacteria (R ≥ 0.4; p < 0.05). Regarding Anaplasma spp., the map having 10% contribution of I. ricinus (10I) and 90% of R. sanguineus (90R) inferred 47.4% of infected dogs in very high-risk areas. In the case of E. canis, the model showing a proportion of 25I-75R showed better validation power (53.4% of infected dogs in very high-risk areas).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The validation approach used in this study produced a good approximation to understand the relative contribution of the two tick species in bacterial disease transmission in dogs in the Iberian Peninsula and Balearic Islands. Rhipicephalus sanguineus appears as the main transmitter of both diseases in the study area (90% and 75% for anaplasmosis and ehrlichiosis respectively), in accordance with its higher abundance and host preference. This estimate may help veterinary staff, clinicians and owners to optimize the control of these diseases in certain vulnerable areas, and thus reduce the risk of infection in risk areas.</p>","PeriodicalId":9041,"journal":{"name":"BMC Veterinary Research","volume":"20 1","pages":"526"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11590303/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Veterinary Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-024-04383-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis are vector-borne bacterial diseases produced by intracellular rickettsial species of the genus Ehrlichia and Anaplasma. Ehrlichia canis and Anaplasma spp. (A. platys and A. phagocytophilum) have reported cases of zoonotic transmision and are the main bacterial agents of canine ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis. They normally present an asymptomatic or mild course in domestic and wild animals with some lethal cases reported. The main vector of these diseases in Europe are the castor bean tick (Ixodes ricinus) and the brown dog tick (Rhipicephalus sanguineus), although only in the latter, the main host is the domestic dogs. The aim of this work is to apply an integrative approach to convert ecological niche models (ENMs) into potential transmission risk models and understand the relative contribution of the two potential vectors (R. sanguineus and I. ricinus) to spread both diseases in the Iberian Peninsula and Balearic Islands.

Results: Two ENMs meeting all criteria were successfully generated for R. sanguineus and I. ricinus with human footprint being the most relevant explanatory variable. The novelty of the study lies in the combination of independent ENMs for both species to estimate the disease transmission risk of specific bacteria (E. canis, A. platys and A. phagocytophilum). Only the transmission risk maps that had higher contribution of R. sanguineus than I. ricinus showed relevant and positive significant correlations between risk and seroprevalence in either of the two species of bacteria (R ≥ 0.4; p < 0.05). Regarding Anaplasma spp., the map having 10% contribution of I. ricinus (10I) and 90% of R. sanguineus (90R) inferred 47.4% of infected dogs in very high-risk areas. In the case of E. canis, the model showing a proportion of 25I-75R showed better validation power (53.4% of infected dogs in very high-risk areas).

Conclusion: The validation approach used in this study produced a good approximation to understand the relative contribution of the two tick species in bacterial disease transmission in dogs in the Iberian Peninsula and Balearic Islands. Rhipicephalus sanguineus appears as the main transmitter of both diseases in the study area (90% and 75% for anaplasmosis and ehrlichiosis respectively), in accordance with its higher abundance and host preference. This estimate may help veterinary staff, clinicians and owners to optimize the control of these diseases in certain vulnerable areas, and thus reduce the risk of infection in risk areas.

西班牙和葡萄牙病媒传播细菌疾病(阿那普拉斯马属和犬艾氏菌)的传播风险。
背景:埃立克次体病和无形体病是由埃立克次体属和无形体属细胞内立克次体物种引起的病媒传播细菌性疾病。犬埃希氏菌和无形体属(A. platys 和 A. phagocytophilum)有人畜共患传播的病例报告,是犬埃希氏菌病和无形体病的主要细菌病原体。它们通常在家畜和野生动物中表现为无症状或轻微的病程,但也有致命病例的报道。这些疾病在欧洲的主要传播媒介是蓖麻蜱(Ixodes ricinus)和棕狗蜱(Rhipicephalus sanguineus),但只有后者的主要宿主是家犬。这项工作的目的是采用一种综合方法,将生态位模型(ENM)转换为潜在的传播风险模型,并了解两种潜在病媒(褐犬蜱和蓖麻蜱)在伊比利亚半岛和巴利阿里群岛传播这两种疾病的相对贡献:结果:成功生成了两种符合所有标准的 R. sanguineus 和 I. ricinus ENMs,其中人类足迹是最相关的解释变量。这项研究的新颖之处在于将这两个物种的独立 ENM 结合起来,以估算特定细菌(犬肠杆菌、扁虱和噬细胞嗜血杆菌)的疾病传播风险。只有矛头鳋的比例高于蓖麻茨鳋的比例的传播风险图才显示出这两种细菌中任何一种的风险与血清流行率之间的相关性和正相关性(R ≥ 0.4; p 结论:矛头鳋的比例高于蓖麻茨鳋的比例的传播风险图显示出这两种细菌中任何一种的风险与血清流行率之间的相关性和正相关性:本研究中使用的验证方法为了解伊比利亚半岛和巴利阿里群岛两种蜱类在犬细菌性疾病传播中的相对作用提供了一个很好的近似值。根据其较高的丰度和对宿主的偏好,在研究区域内,红蜱似乎是这两种疾病的主要传播者(无形体病和埃立克氏病的传播率分别为 90% 和 75%)。这一估计可能有助于兽医人员、临床医生和饲养者在某些易感染地区优化对这些疾病的控制,从而降低风险地区的感染风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Veterinary Research
BMC Veterinary Research VETERINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.80%
发文量
420
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Veterinary Research is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of veterinary science and medicine, including the epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention and treatment of medical conditions of domestic, companion, farm and wild animals, as well as the biomedical processes that underlie their health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信