Willingness of population health survey participants to provide personal health information and biological samples.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Harpreet Jaswal, Anca Ialomiteanu, Hayley Hamilton, Jürgen Rehm, Samantha Wells, Kevin D Shield
{"title":"Willingness of population health survey participants to provide personal health information and biological samples.","authors":"Harpreet Jaswal, Anca Ialomiteanu, Hayley Hamilton, Jürgen Rehm, Samantha Wells, Kevin D Shield","doi":"10.1186/s12889-024-20769-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Biological sample collection and data linkage can expand the utility of population health surveys. The present study investigates factors associated with population health survey respondents' willingness to provide biological samples and personal health information.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using data from the 2019 Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH) Monitor survey (n = 2,827), we examined participants' willingness to provide blood samples, saliva samples, probabilistic linkage, and direct linkage with personal health information. Associations of willingness to provide such information with socio-demographic, substance use, and mental health details were also examined. Question order effects were tested using a randomized trial.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The proportion of respondents willing to provide blood samples, saliva samples, probabilistic linkage, and direct linkage with personal health information were 19.9%, 36.2%, 82.1%, and 17%, respectively. Willingness significantly varied by age, race, employment, non-medical prescription opioid use (past year), cocaine use (lifetime), and psychological distress. Significant question order effects were observed. Respondents were more likely to be willing to provide a saliva sample when this question was asked first compared to first being asked for direct data linkage. Similarly, respondents were more likely to be willing to allow for probabilistic data linkage when this question was asked first compared to first being asked for a saliva sample.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A lack of willingness to provide biological samples or permit data linkage may lead to representivity issues in studies which rely on such information. The presence of question order effects suggests that the willingness of respondents can be increased through strategic ordering of survey structures.</p>","PeriodicalId":9039,"journal":{"name":"BMC Public Health","volume":"24 1","pages":"3279"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-20769-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Biological sample collection and data linkage can expand the utility of population health surveys. The present study investigates factors associated with population health survey respondents' willingness to provide biological samples and personal health information.

Methods: Using data from the 2019 Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH) Monitor survey (n = 2,827), we examined participants' willingness to provide blood samples, saliva samples, probabilistic linkage, and direct linkage with personal health information. Associations of willingness to provide such information with socio-demographic, substance use, and mental health details were also examined. Question order effects were tested using a randomized trial.

Results: The proportion of respondents willing to provide blood samples, saliva samples, probabilistic linkage, and direct linkage with personal health information were 19.9%, 36.2%, 82.1%, and 17%, respectively. Willingness significantly varied by age, race, employment, non-medical prescription opioid use (past year), cocaine use (lifetime), and psychological distress. Significant question order effects were observed. Respondents were more likely to be willing to provide a saliva sample when this question was asked first compared to first being asked for direct data linkage. Similarly, respondents were more likely to be willing to allow for probabilistic data linkage when this question was asked first compared to first being asked for a saliva sample.

Conclusion: A lack of willingness to provide biological samples or permit data linkage may lead to representivity issues in studies which rely on such information. The presence of question order effects suggests that the willingness of respondents can be increased through strategic ordering of survey structures.

人口健康调查参与者提供个人健康信息和生物样本的意愿。
背景:生物样本收集和数据链接可以扩大人口健康调查的效用。本研究调查了人口健康调查受访者愿意提供生物样本和个人健康信息的相关因素:利用 2019 年成瘾与心理健康中心(CAMH)监测调查(n = 2,827)的数据,我们研究了参与者提供血液样本、唾液样本、概率链接和直接链接个人健康信息的意愿。我们还研究了提供此类信息的意愿与社会人口学、药物使用和心理健康细节之间的关联。使用随机试验测试了问题顺序效应:愿意提供血液样本、唾液样本、概率链接和直接链接个人健康信息的受访者比例分别为 19.9%、36.2%、82.1% 和 17%。不同年龄、种族、就业、非医疗处方阿片类药物使用(过去一年)、可卡因使用(终生)和心理困扰者的意愿存在明显差异。我们还观察到了明显的问题顺序效应。如果首先询问唾液样本,受访者更愿意提供唾液样本;如果首先询问直接数据链接,受访者更愿意提供唾液样本。同样,与首先被要求提供唾液样本相比,首先被要求提供唾液样本时,受访者更愿意提供概率数据链接:结论:受访者不愿意提供生物样本或允许数据链接可能会导致依赖此类信息的研究出现代表性问题。问题顺序效应的存在表明,可以通过对调查结构进行策略性排序来提高受访者的意愿。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Public Health
BMC Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
4.40%
发文量
2108
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BMC Public Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on the epidemiology of disease and the understanding of all aspects of public health. The journal has a special focus on the social determinants of health, the environmental, behavioral, and occupational correlates of health and disease, and the impact of health policies, practices and interventions on the community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信