Effect of mother's active pushing at cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Ahmed Sayed, Anwar A Sayed, Delnaz Fard, Peter Hillemanns, Constantin Von Kaisenberg, Rüdiger Klapdor
{"title":"Effect of mother's active pushing at cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Ahmed Sayed, Anwar A Sayed, Delnaz Fard, Peter Hillemanns, Constantin Von Kaisenberg, Rüdiger Klapdor","doi":"10.1007/s00404-024-07835-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the effect of maternal active pushing during cesarean section (CS) on postoperative pain, intraoperative discomfort, and the mother's sense of control and participation.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A prospective, randomized controlled study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients were randomly assigned into two groups. In the Conventional group (n = 45), the CS was performed traditionally without maternal pushing. In the Assisted group (n = 55), patients were instructed to push during delivery. Outcomes measures included patients' perceived pressure, pain, and sense of participation. Breastfeeding and postnatal depression were assessed using validated scales, along with maternal and neonatal outcomes, surgeon satisfaction, and operation duration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients in the Assisted group reported significantly lower fundal pressure intensity (VAS score 3 vs. 5, P < 0.01) compared to the Conventional group. There was no significant difference in postoperative pain. However, women in the Assisted group reported a greater sense of participation (6 vs. 0, P < 0.01) and control (4 vs. 0, P < 0.05) than those in the Conventional group. No significant maternal or neonatal complications were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Maternal active pushing during CS positively impacted intraoperative experience by reducing perceived pressure and enhancing the sense of control and participation, without adverse effects on maternal or neonatal outcomes. These findings support further research with larger, multi-center studies to validate the potential benefits of this approach.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>NCT05520580 ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05520580 ).</p>","PeriodicalId":8330,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-024-07835-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of maternal active pushing during cesarean section (CS) on postoperative pain, intraoperative discomfort, and the mother's sense of control and participation.

Design: A prospective, randomized controlled study.

Methods: Patients were randomly assigned into two groups. In the Conventional group (n = 45), the CS was performed traditionally without maternal pushing. In the Assisted group (n = 55), patients were instructed to push during delivery. Outcomes measures included patients' perceived pressure, pain, and sense of participation. Breastfeeding and postnatal depression were assessed using validated scales, along with maternal and neonatal outcomes, surgeon satisfaction, and operation duration.

Results: Patients in the Assisted group reported significantly lower fundal pressure intensity (VAS score 3 vs. 5, P < 0.01) compared to the Conventional group. There was no significant difference in postoperative pain. However, women in the Assisted group reported a greater sense of participation (6 vs. 0, P < 0.01) and control (4 vs. 0, P < 0.05) than those in the Conventional group. No significant maternal or neonatal complications were observed.

Conclusion: Maternal active pushing during CS positively impacted intraoperative experience by reducing perceived pressure and enhancing the sense of control and participation, without adverse effects on maternal or neonatal outcomes. These findings support further research with larger, multi-center studies to validate the potential benefits of this approach.

Trial registration: NCT05520580 ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05520580 ).

剖宫产时母亲主动用力的效果:随机对照试验。
目的:本研究旨在评估剖宫产术(CS)中产妇主动用力对术后疼痛、术中不适以及产妇控制感和参与感的影响:本研究旨在评估剖宫产术(CS)中产妇主动用力对术后疼痛、术中不适以及产妇控制感和参与感的影响:前瞻性随机对照研究:方法:将患者随机分为两组。在传统组(n = 45),CS 以传统方式进行,产妇无需用力。在辅助组(n = 55)中,指导患者在分娩过程中用力。结果测量包括患者感受到的压力、疼痛和参与感。母乳喂养和产后抑郁情况以及产妇和新生儿结局、外科医生满意度和手术持续时间均采用有效量表进行评估:结果:助产组患者的宫底压力强度明显降低(VAS 评分 3 vs. 5,P 结论:助产组患者的宫底压力强度明显降低(VAS 评分 3 vs. 5,P 结论):在 CS 过程中,产妇主动助推对术中体验有积极影响,可降低感知压力,增强控制感和参与感,对产妇和新生儿预后无不良影响。这些发现支持进一步开展更大规模的多中心研究,以验证这种方法的潜在益处:NCT05520580 ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05520580 )。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
15.40%
发文量
493
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1870 as "Archiv für Gynaekologie", Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics has a long and outstanding tradition. Since 1922 the journal has been the Organ of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe. "The Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics" is circulated in over 40 countries world wide and is indexed in "PubMed/Medline" and "Science Citation Index Expanded/Journal Citation Report". The journal publishes invited and submitted reviews; peer-reviewed original articles about clinical topics and basic research as well as news and views and guidelines and position statements from all sub-specialties in gynecology and obstetrics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信