Estimating a Drug's Price After Loss of Exclusivity as a Function of Its Cost of Goods Sold.

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Melanie D Whittington, T Joseph Mattingly
{"title":"Estimating a Drug's Price After Loss of Exclusivity as a Function of Its Cost of Goods Sold.","authors":"Melanie D Whittington, T Joseph Mattingly","doi":"10.1007/s40258-024-00928-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The majority of cost-effectiveness analyses of pharmaceuticals do not incorporate future price changes that are expected once generic competition enters the market. A common rationale for not doing so is the uncertainty around what postloss of exclusivity price to model. The objective of this study is to assess if a drug's price postloss of exclusivity can be estimated on the basis of its cost of goods sold (COGS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>First, stakeholders were engaged to understand pricing practices for generic drugs. Then peer-reviewed literature, gray literature, and manufacturer financial statements were reviewed to estimate the typical manufacturer profit margin over COGS. Using pricing data from the Mark Cuban CostPlus Drug Company (MCCPDC), estimates of COGS were calculated by drug form. Finally, a COGS-based approach to estimating a drug's price postloss of exclusivity was tested.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>COGS were estimated for 2168 unique National Drug Codes (NDCs) reported in the MCCPDC price list by removing the typical manufacturer profit margin (50%) from the manufacturer prices (net of any markup or fees from the MCCPDC). A tablet/capsule, the most common form in the price list, had a median COGS of $0.10 per tablet/capsule. Estimating a drug's price postloss of exclusivity as the median COGS for that drug form times two (to reflect a 50% profit margin), produces estimates of postloss of exclusivity prices that account for drug-specific attributes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides an evidence-based approach to estimate a drug's price postloss of exclusivity as a function of its COGS for incorporation into cost-effectiveness analyses.</p>","PeriodicalId":8065,"journal":{"name":"Applied Health Economics and Health Policy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Health Economics and Health Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40258-024-00928-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The majority of cost-effectiveness analyses of pharmaceuticals do not incorporate future price changes that are expected once generic competition enters the market. A common rationale for not doing so is the uncertainty around what postloss of exclusivity price to model. The objective of this study is to assess if a drug's price postloss of exclusivity can be estimated on the basis of its cost of goods sold (COGS).

Methods: First, stakeholders were engaged to understand pricing practices for generic drugs. Then peer-reviewed literature, gray literature, and manufacturer financial statements were reviewed to estimate the typical manufacturer profit margin over COGS. Using pricing data from the Mark Cuban CostPlus Drug Company (MCCPDC), estimates of COGS were calculated by drug form. Finally, a COGS-based approach to estimating a drug's price postloss of exclusivity was tested.

Results: COGS were estimated for 2168 unique National Drug Codes (NDCs) reported in the MCCPDC price list by removing the typical manufacturer profit margin (50%) from the manufacturer prices (net of any markup or fees from the MCCPDC). A tablet/capsule, the most common form in the price list, had a median COGS of $0.10 per tablet/capsule. Estimating a drug's price postloss of exclusivity as the median COGS for that drug form times two (to reflect a 50% profit margin), produces estimates of postloss of exclusivity prices that account for drug-specific attributes.

Conclusions: This study provides an evidence-based approach to estimate a drug's price postloss of exclusivity as a function of its COGS for incorporation into cost-effectiveness analyses.

根据销售成本估算药品失去独家代理权后的价格。
背景:大多数药品的成本效益分析都没有考虑到仿制药竞争进入市场后预计的未来价格变化。不这样做的一个常见理由是,不确定要对失去专有权后的价格进行建模。本研究的目的是评估是否可以根据药品的销售成本(COGS)来估算药品失去独占权后的价格:方法:首先,让利益相关者了解仿制药的定价惯例。然后查阅同行评议文献、灰色文献和制造商财务报表,以估算制造商相对于 COGS 的典型利润率。利用 Mark Cuban CostPlus Drug Company (MCCPDC) 的定价数据,按药品种类计算出 COGS 的估算值。最后,对基于 COGS 的方法进行了测试,以估算药品失去独占权后的价格:通过从制造商的价格中去除典型的制造商利润率(50%)(扣除任何加价或来自 MCCPDC 的费用),对 MCCPDC 价目表中报告的 2168 种独特的国家药品代码 (NDC) 的 COGS 进行了估算。片剂/胶囊是价目表中最常见的剂型,其 COGS 中位数为 0.10 美元/片/胶囊。将一种药品丧失专营权后的价格估算为该药品形式的 COGS 中位数乘以 2(以反映 50%的利润率),就可以估算出专营权丧失后的价格,其中考虑到了药品的特定属性:本研究提供了一种以证据为基础的方法,用于估算药品失去专营权后的价格,作为其 COGS 的函数,以便纳入成本效益分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Health Economics and Health Policy
Applied Health Economics and Health Policy Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics and Econometrics
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.80%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: Applied Health Economics and Health Policy provides timely publication of cutting-edge research and expert opinion from this increasingly important field, making it a vital resource for payers, providers and researchers alike. The journal includes high quality economic research and reviews of all aspects of healthcare from various perspectives and countries, designed to communicate the latest applied information in health economics and health policy. While emphasis is placed on information with practical applications, a strong basis of underlying scientific rigor is maintained.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信