Educational assortative mating and couples’ linked occupational trajectories in China

IF 3.2 2区 社会学 Q1 SOCIOLOGY
Jian Song, Bo Hu, Yang Zhang
{"title":"Educational assortative mating and couples’ linked occupational trajectories in China","authors":"Jian Song,&nbsp;Bo Hu,&nbsp;Yang Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.ssresearch.2024.103114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Educational assortative mating profoundly influences couples' division of labor; however, we know little about how it shapes couples' paired occupational trajectories. We employed multi-channel sequence analysis to discern types of couples' linked occupational trajectories based on the couple-level data from China Labor-force Dynamics Survey (CLDS), and multinomial logistic models to examine how educational assortative mating is associated with couples' occupational trajectories. For most occupational types, husbands had more advantaged or at least similar occupational trajectories than their wives. Couples in educational hypergamy were likely to have occupational trajectory types with husbands having some advantages; couples in educational hypogamy were likely to have occupational trajectory types with wives having some advantages. The specialization and resource bargaining perspectives provide more powerful explanations than the “doing gender” perspective. Chinese couples tend to choose the occupational arrangement that maximizes the family's economic interests rather than the one that best conforms to gender norms and expectations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48338,"journal":{"name":"Social Science Research","volume":"126 ","pages":"Article 103114"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science Research","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0049089X24001364","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Educational assortative mating profoundly influences couples' division of labor; however, we know little about how it shapes couples' paired occupational trajectories. We employed multi-channel sequence analysis to discern types of couples' linked occupational trajectories based on the couple-level data from China Labor-force Dynamics Survey (CLDS), and multinomial logistic models to examine how educational assortative mating is associated with couples' occupational trajectories. For most occupational types, husbands had more advantaged or at least similar occupational trajectories than their wives. Couples in educational hypergamy were likely to have occupational trajectory types with husbands having some advantages; couples in educational hypogamy were likely to have occupational trajectory types with wives having some advantages. The specialization and resource bargaining perspectives provide more powerful explanations than the “doing gender” perspective. Chinese couples tend to choose the occupational arrangement that maximizes the family's economic interests rather than the one that best conforms to gender norms and expectations.
中国的教育同配和夫妇的关联职业轨迹
教育配对深刻影响着夫妻的劳动分工,但我们对教育配对如何影响夫妻的配对职业轨迹却知之甚少。我们基于中国劳动力动态调查(CLDS)的夫妇层面数据,采用多通道序列分析来识别夫妇关联职业轨迹的类型,并采用多叉逻辑模型来研究教育同配如何与夫妇的职业轨迹相关联。在大多数职业类型中,丈夫的职业轨迹比妻子更有利或至少相似。教育超配夫妻的职业轨迹类型很可能是丈夫具有一定优势;教育低配夫妻的职业轨迹类型很可能是妻子具有一定优势。与 "做性别 "的观点相比,专业化和资源讨价还价的观点提供了更有力的解释。中国夫妇倾向于选择家庭经济利益最大化的职业安排,而不是最符合性别规范和期望的职业安排。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
65 days
期刊介绍: Social Science Research publishes papers devoted to quantitative social science research and methodology. The journal features articles that illustrate the use of quantitative methods in the empirical solution of substantive problems, and emphasizes those concerned with issues or methods that cut across traditional disciplinary lines. Special attention is given to methods that have been used by only one particular social science discipline, but that may have application to a broader range of areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信