A systematic review of life cycle assessment and environmental footprint for the global coffee value chain

IF 9.8 1区 社会学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Letícia Sarmento dos Muchangos , Cristian Mejia , Ranjit Gupta , Shuan Sadreghazi , Yuya Kajikawa
{"title":"A systematic review of life cycle assessment and environmental footprint for the global coffee value chain","authors":"Letícia Sarmento dos Muchangos ,&nbsp;Cristian Mejia ,&nbsp;Ranjit Gupta ,&nbsp;Shuan Sadreghazi ,&nbsp;Yuya Kajikawa","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2024.107740","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The rapidly growing global demand for coffee has fueled proportionate production. However, a comprehensive and consistent understanding of the associated environmental assessment (EIA) across the production-to-consumption value chain is lacking. Despite using EIA tools like life cycle assessment (LCA) and environmental footprint (EF), achieving a unified understanding of coffee's environmental impact throughout this chain remains challenging. We aimed to survey the literature on coffee LCA at length and EF briefly to map coverage areas and analyze thematic trends. We analyzed thematic trends in coffee LCA research. Moreover, we identified five critical groups listed in order of significance: by-products, LCA and broad coffee sustainability matters, coffee and its environmental impacts, waste management, and biochar. Our analysis revealed a shift from traditional environmental assessment of cultivation processes and waste management toward using coffee by-products in refinery research, developing new materials, and biomedical and pharmaceutical functions. We also found that the extant literature has not converged on a standard in both method and scope, resulting in inconsistencies in reporting coffee LCA application settings. The review results contribute by describing and organizing the LCA research status, identifying literature gaps, and guiding progress toward transparent modeling at a global level. This study highlights the need for standardized methodologies and reporting practices in coffee LCA research to improve consistency and comparability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":309,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","volume":"111 ","pages":"Article 107740"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925524003275","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The rapidly growing global demand for coffee has fueled proportionate production. However, a comprehensive and consistent understanding of the associated environmental assessment (EIA) across the production-to-consumption value chain is lacking. Despite using EIA tools like life cycle assessment (LCA) and environmental footprint (EF), achieving a unified understanding of coffee's environmental impact throughout this chain remains challenging. We aimed to survey the literature on coffee LCA at length and EF briefly to map coverage areas and analyze thematic trends. We analyzed thematic trends in coffee LCA research. Moreover, we identified five critical groups listed in order of significance: by-products, LCA and broad coffee sustainability matters, coffee and its environmental impacts, waste management, and biochar. Our analysis revealed a shift from traditional environmental assessment of cultivation processes and waste management toward using coffee by-products in refinery research, developing new materials, and biomedical and pharmaceutical functions. We also found that the extant literature has not converged on a standard in both method and scope, resulting in inconsistencies in reporting coffee LCA application settings. The review results contribute by describing and organizing the LCA research status, identifying literature gaps, and guiding progress toward transparent modeling at a global level. This study highlights the need for standardized methodologies and reporting practices in coffee LCA research to improve consistency and comparability.
对全球咖啡价值链的生命周期评估和环境足迹进行系统审查
全球咖啡需求的快速增长推动了相应的生产。然而,对整个生产到消费价值链的相关环境评估(EIA)缺乏全面一致的认识。尽管使用了生命周期评估(LCA)和环境足迹(EF)等环境影响评估工具,但要统一理解咖啡在整个价值链中对环境的影响仍具有挑战性。我们的目标是详细调查咖啡生命周期评估和环境足迹的相关文献,绘制覆盖范围图并分析主题趋势。我们分析了咖啡生命周期评估研究的主题趋势。此外,我们还确定了按重要性排列的五个关键组:副产品、生命周期评估和广泛的咖啡可持续发展问题、咖啡及其环境影响、废物管理和生物炭。我们的分析表明,从传统的种植过程和废物管理环境评估转向将咖啡副产品用于精炼研究、开发新材料以及生物医学和制药功能。我们还发现,现有文献在方法和范围上都没有统一的标准,导致在报告咖啡生命周期评估应用环境时出现不一致。综述结果有助于描述和整理生命周期评估研究现状,找出文献空白点,并指导全球透明建模的进展。本研究强调了咖啡生命周期评估研究中标准化方法和报告实践的必要性,以提高一致性和可比性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
10.10%
发文量
200
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Impact Assessment Review is an interdisciplinary journal that serves a global audience of practitioners, policymakers, and academics involved in assessing the environmental impact of policies, projects, processes, and products. The journal focuses on innovative theory and practice in environmental impact assessment (EIA). Papers are expected to present innovative ideas, be topical, and coherent. The journal emphasizes concepts, methods, techniques, approaches, and systems related to EIA theory and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信